So sad to learn of another cruel sacking of a true professional with years of faithful service to his patients.
Another one who’s paid a huge price simply for doing his job and acting with integrity.
We are in a dark place…
There’s something so twisted about the European Union demanding abolishment of the death penalty but legalizing euthanasia for gang-rape victims.
Scottish COVID-19 inquiry|New witness statement evidence
Jini Mathew.🏴
The Transatlantic Slave Trade is now being recognised as the “worst crime against humanity”…
Whilst 🇱🇾Libyans are literally selling Africans as slaves in 2026.
Why is crimes committed by Muslims always ignored?
UK 10 year yields just broke through 5%.
Even the markets know the UK is teetering on the precipice!
Borrowing costs are out of control, the economy is wankered (technical term) but Labour still can’t concede we MUST drill!
Do you see how insane this now is?
So what is a doctor or researcher supposed to do when the data they have collected suggests a conclusion? Not report it so others can confirm compare with other data. Data driven evidence and hypotheses are out of fashion?
This reminded me of reading about some police and council workers noticing that data suggested mass sexual exploitation of children taking place and reporting their analysis being disciplined, reassigned, sacked by higher authority.
And so it goes on ... GMC suspends local doctor who raised vaccine concerns https://guernseypress.com/news/2026/03/27/gmc-suspends-local-doctor-who-raised-vaccine-concerns
The interruption from another peer ("for goodness sake") is precisely the same treatment conscientious objectors will get with any safeguards – make no mistake. Thanks to @Fox_Claire (& @Mark_J_Harper) for calling it out; who will object when it occurs down the line?
Only 6m after pfizer vaccine became available (while still unlicensed), UK doctors were warned in writing about myocarditis risk in young people.
There followed a rise in myocarditis diagnoses. Surely it was Dr Patterson's duty to highlight this? @GMCuk
https://x.com/HelenHeat0n/status/1440044773268606981?s=20
This is terrible.
How can anyone trust their doctor if this is how good doctors who follow the evidence, no matter how uncomfortable it is to the authorities, are treated.
Someone brightened a couple of still shots from the Harry Potter TV series trailer.
Look how much better it looks with some brightness and color!
Their answer to everything - shut down the truth tellers.
One day it’s a conveniently ‘stolen’ phone, the next it’s mysteriously destroyed documents. There is clearly widespread and systemic corruption across the government and civil service.
Wow.
It might take at least 90 minutes to pull the records for these cases from 2021 onward.
A student might make a nice spreadsheet with vaccine status, dose 1 date, dose 2 date, ... diagnosis date.
Perhaps the good doctor already did that and thus was 'invited' to move on.😢
It is a witch-hunt plain and simple
This is really worrying and opens Pandora’s box
Why does the @NHS and General Medical Council get rid of the very best doctors and prescribe so many drugs with bad side effects? @wesstreeting Can we really afford to get rid of so many good doctors? Why even would a good doctor stay in the UK or NHS?
In Canada, a hospice that refused to offer assisted dying had its funding cut, staff sacked, and was eventually taken over by the state.
Baroness Grey-Thompson (@Tanni_GT) warns that such horrors could be in store in Britain, under this Bill.
It is not the government, it was a tv ad from a Canadian fashion retailer Simons. It ran a few years ago but was quickly pulled.
Note the blue whale, a reference to an internet phenomenon where strangers would try to find victims online to talk them into committing suicide.
Police Knew That Rape Gang Perpetrator Was HIV Positive, But Failed To Arrest Him Or Notify His Victims❗️
🚨NEWS: Leftist Government in Brazil make it ILLEGAL to interrupt women in meetings
- Punishable by up to 5 YEARS in prison
- The official crime is 'misogyny' but the examples are CRAZY
“interrupting or doubting a woman in a meeting”
Madness
Day three at Billy Ralph Fitness to Practise inquiry👋
This morning he made an application to have the case struck out on multiple grounds, including the lack of any clinical harm or adverse outcomes for patients
💥“DEEPLY IMMORAL”; “OBNOXIOUS”!
Baroness Lawlor doesn’t mince her words about proposals that doctors would be forced to be trained in assisted suicide provision even if they are opposed to it on conscience grounds.
You should be worried.
The GMC are trying to change the rules on conscientious objection.
https://x.com/ClareCraigPath/status/2035062748178939958?s=20
It's deeply disturbing that some of the most ethical, knowledgeable doctors I've listened to are being attacked for sharing what they observed since the Covid vaccine roll-out.
I urge the public to listen to them for yourselves.
They don't deserve to be penalised for honesty.
This policy would functionally forbid any person with a secular or religious objection to assisted suicide from entering the medical profession in Britain.
And they call US the zealots?!
We are told this is about dignity. About choice. About autonomy. But autonomy does not exist in a vacuum.
Choice!? This is not about choice!
What does ‘choice’ mean for a 25-year-old woman who has been gang-raped, had no justice, rapists still out there living their lives, whilst she is institutionalised, pathologised, paralysed, and left to live in chronic pain?
What does ‘choice’ mean when every system she has encountered has failed to keep her safe, failed to support her, and instead labelled her responses as disordered?
What does ‘choice’ mean when the only consistent message she has received is: you are too much, too broken, too difficult to fix?
We need to be honest about what we are witnessing.
We are witnessing a system that cannot - or will not - provide the depth of trauma-informed, relational, long-term support that survivors need. And systems that will not address male violence - which is a common denominator in these cases.
And so, instead, it offers an exit - for the victim.
Rest in Peace, Noelia. Another young woman, euthanised after rape and abuse.
My new article is in your inbox now. Check comments.
Do watch along. Baroness Gerada has just argued that ALL doctors must be trained and competent in delivery of assisted dying!!!!
The way the Guardian framed it was gross
Ed Miliband’s Net Zero fantasy is now hitting reality.
We’re on the brink of importing salt, a resource Britain has produced for generations.
This isn’t climate leadership. It’s industrial self sabotage.
And it’s our children who’ll inherit the cost.
That's an October 7th necklace. How many more people like this are there in the NHS and other institutions across the UK?
This is utter fiction from Prue Leith. The question is who fed her the lies? Is Dignity in Dying so far gone that they'll say anything.
If your government finds it easier to euthanize a rape victim instead of prosecuting her rapists, your society is lost.
Glad this was deleted- it reached *epic* new heights of inaccuracy. The Archbishop of Canterbury is apparently the chief opponent of the Assisted Dying Bill & has tabled 200 amendments (she has in fact not tabled one).
At this point it's full House of Lords Derangement Syndrome.
Any lingering doubt I had about leaving the ECHR just ended
Seems to me the "right to life" doesn't mean very much in our new, amoral, autonomy obsessed world where desperately vulnerable people who need help are cheered on while in the pits of despair
We should all be ashamed
During the Pandemic there were only a tiny minority of Politicians who knew and understood that much of what was occurring: lockdowns, the suspension of human rights, the effects upon our children etc. was WRONG
One of the few Politicians who was unafraid to speak the truth throughout the Pandemic was Michael McNamara. All Doctors who tried to offer criticism of policies and genetic vaccines etc owe a debt of gratitude to Michael for his courageous and honest stance throughout the Pandemic.
This woman is not just a bag of expensive organs!
Bizarre article from @dignityindying’s Prue Leith, who thinks Sarah Mullally has “led” a “filibuster” (she has spoken twice), that Mullally proposed “200…amendments” (actual figure: zero), and that the bulk of amendments have been tabled by “just seven peers” (actual figure 50+)
I mean, who rocks up to a hearing wearing a necklace in support of terrorist atrocities.
Who *does* that.