The judge and jury clearly forgot that a under British law,A CHILD CANNOT CONSENT TO SEX.
Sex with a child is RAPE.
She was underage, a child, to young to consent to sexual interiors...
She WAS GANGRAPED.
END OF.
R to @ClareCraigPath: gov.uk/government/publicatio…
You can be a "case" in the meningitis outbreak even if you don't have meningitis.
That is a brave tattoo.
May they rest in peace.
Most people don’t realise where the £180 million actually went at the A303 Stonehenge tunnel project.
It wasn’t construction.
It was years of:
• Environmental impact assessments
• Heritage & archaeological studies
• Legal challenges and consultations
• Design, engineering and traffic modelling
• Public inquiries and revisions
All before a single shovel hit the ground.
This is the real problem in Britain:
We don’t just waste money, we build systems that guarantee it.
£180 million to build nothing.
Instead of simply disagreeing with Nick, these MPs are calling for him to be “investigated”. This is exactly why an Islamophobia definition is so dangerous. People need to be able to disagree and debate without the authorities weighing in.
This country is not safe for women and children. How can 3 teenage boys gang rape a 12 year old girl, record it, have her no clearly heard and still get found not guilty????
Absolutely devastating!
She was 12!!!
I’m a very proud Mother, raising Lions not sheep.
How fucking sinister is this??
My son claims he didn’t get caught and in the meeting the teacher said someone had handed him a note.
Either way….
“You were caught talking at xxx, xxx and xxx about your ideological views - you were
midway through a diatribe on why being part of the LGBTQIA+ community should be considered
a mental illness/condition.
I have since had a meeting with you, making it absolutely clear that making comments like that
is deeply offensive and ideologically abhorrent and in no way appropriate to be preaching within
the walls of the college.
We talked about what effect saying such things may have on your peers, and staff. You were
receptive to the feedback and promised that you would not talk this way in college again.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind you that this written warning will remain active on your
student record for the duration of 3 months after which they can become spent but will remain on your
student record.”
I can't wrap my head around how a girl 4 years under the age of consent can possibly be ruled to have consented it's not even a question, it's just not possible for her to have consented to this
The abortionists are not hiding their strategy.
It is clear that they want to legalise abortion up to birth FOR DOCTORS, not just for women.
We have always warned this.
They are saying it out in the open.
This is the slippery slope.
King Charles has the legitimate power to reject this abortion up to birth bill.
If the Royal veto is ever valid (which it is), it is for the protection of innocent human life.
R to @ClareCraigPath: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/19/meningitis-b-outbreak-kent-students-health-vaccines
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/outbreak-of-invasive-meningococcal-disease-south-east-england
Have the 30,000 (!) healthy people given antibiotics in South East England really given informed consent?
Breaking|UK COVID-19 inquiry Module 3 Report
🎥video creator @biologyphenom
Remarkable revelations by Chair Heather Hallet on the UK's deadly lockdown response.
'‘Some people were not admitted to hospital when they should have been. Those taken to hospital in an ambulance often waited hours to be admitted.’’🆘
‘‘The lack of screening for colorectal cancer led to missed and late diagnosis, longer waits for treatment and ultimately LOSS OF LIFE.’’
‘‘Many patients did NOT receive the quality of healthcare they would have done in non pandemic times. Some people did NOT get taken to hospital and some were NOT admitted to intensive care DESPITE their poor condition.’’🆘
‘‘Throughout the pandemic there were reports of inappropriate and or BLANKET DNACPRnotices being imposed on groups of people. Such as people with learning disabilities or older people. This should NOT have happened.’’
🚨: They’re expanding electronic tagging… while letting criminals out of prison early!
Let that sink in.
So the people who should be locked up are walking free
And the rest of us are being quietly pulled into a system of monitoring, curfews and control.
But here’s the real question no one wants to answer:
What even counts as a “criminal” anymore?
Because I’ve just been placed under investigation for speech where I am being blackmailed into going to a so called “voluntary” police interview under the Public Order Act for being "offensive".
Not violence. Not theft. Not harm. Words.
This is how it starts. You blur the line between real crime and speech. You overload the system. You release offenders early. Then you roll out “solutions” like tagging, tracking, restrictions.
This isn’t about safety. It’s about control.
We are not suspects, we are not barcodes and we are not criminals.
Fix the root problem - don’t build a system that treats the entire country like one.
Saying an issue is complex is sitting on the fence.
The issue debated last night was a simple binary choice between the life and death of babies.
There’s nothing in between.
If the Church of England can’t be definitive, how can it lead the way for its flock?
A fertiliser miss for the ministers reference.
Not even arctic Canada is as deprived of sunlight as northern Britain. No wonder the world bank concluded we were the second least suitable country for solar power after Ireland.
This should have been on the front page of The New York Times.
I speak to students in America and most have no idea that more than 30,000 Iranians were killed for protesting and demanding freedom.
No names. No faces. No coverage. This silence kills me.💔
Thank you, Australia.
If the Ramadan observant children aren’t eating or drinking, why do they need to be in the cafeteria anyway?
Where do the non-Muslim children eat?
This is for kids in years 4-9 (8-14 year olds - in Catholicism children are - sensibly - exempted from the requirement to fast even those that do are still allowed one meal and two collations (small meals).
A week after the election I organised a discreet meeting of around fifty Christian thought leaders nervous of what an ideological driven government might enact and how Christians might prepare. We never imagined the decriminalisation of abortion up to birth. Never.
To match the average police pension after 30 years service, you'd need to have £1.5 MILLION in your private pension...by your mid 50s (!)
Less that 1% of people with private pensions will accrue this.
The Public Sector are the real 1%.
The State is unsustainable.
This is a bad day for the UK. We are a country that refuses to address industrial scale rape, abandons the victims while endorsing killing babies at birth. The devil is in the room. @UKLabour
The House of Lords may have just put the King in a very difficult position.
I was trying to explain to someone yesterday why women defend single-sex spaces.
“Imagine you were forced into an enclosed space with a strange man and told to take your top off in front of him. No choice. No opting out.”
“That’s different,” they said. “That’s basically sexual assault.”
“Exactly,” I replied.
“Now imagine the man is wearing women’s clothes - but you still know he’s a man.”
You could literally see the penny drop.
This is the grown-up version of being plied with cider at a party, shoved into a cupboard with a boy - then being told you’re frigid if you don’t do what he wants.
Only now, frigid has been replaced with bigot.
Where were the conservative peers?
The vote was not close but I hope they regret this.
We've aborted 10m children since it was legalised.
There's your population crisis right there.
Correct. Cancer deaths decreased in 2020 in Australia. But then they shot up. Crazy eh?
Can any MP or Lord who voted for it explain to me how at 37+ weeks gestation an at home DIY abortion can ever be preferable to simply delivering the unwanted baby alive in hospital and giving up for adoption?
What am I missing here?
The reporting on abortion to term is annoying me.
My instinct has always been pro-life.
But the debate in the UK was settled around 24 weeks. Some wanted less, some wanted more. It was only after WHO guidance changed that the debate was reopened here.
The amendment to the Police and Crime Bill does NOT legalise abortion up to birth. The legislation still centres on 24 weeks.
And it has always been the case that abortions after 24 weeks even up to birth, with sign off from 2 doctors, where there are abnormalities or the mother’s life is in danger.
Many people question whether a cleft palate should fall into that category, but it is true that the current law allows doctors to interpret it that way. (Unbelievably)
The change to the law now means that if a woman procures an abortion herself after 24 weeks, even up to full term, she cannot be prosecuted.
Every part of me rejects that.
But it is important to be accurate, that is not the same thing as saying abortion is now fully legal up to birth. It’s a change in how the law treats the woman, not a wholesale rewriting of the legal limits of 24 weeks.
I think that’s an important distinction. Do I think it will be abused? Yes. Is it abhorrent, Yes.
An appaling dystopian move which further devalues the preciousness of human life. It also effectively legalises infanticide of new born babies born secretly as police will no longer be allowed to investigate whether the 40wk fetus was killed in uterus or immediately post partum.
This woman should not be a bishop! Tell me, what Christian legalises the murder of a child?!
It is ironic that the island nation that made world headlines for going off the deep end during Covid under Prime Minister and ‘single source of truth’ Jacinda Ardern is now one of the few member states pushing back on WHO pandemic reforms.
In Britain, you can kill a full-term baby in the womb
But you can’t, in certain areas, pray silently
Bear in mind that a significant portion of the medical profession supported this abortion up to birth bill.
Including the Royal College of Obs and Gynae.
The medical profession is fundamentally untrustworthy with these people at its head. They have no credibility whatsoever.
The logic of abortion: if at 3 months, why not at 9? If a matter of choice, why should it ever be criminal?
Watch this: it's what will happen with assisted suicide.
The appalling failure of the Lords not to vote against abortion up to birth has allowed an unspeakable evil into our society. No longer will an unborn baby have any right to life, up to the point of birth. The consequences of this will be horrific - the mindless and diabolical destruction of the most vulnerable in our society by their own mothers, and the complete devaluation of human life.
It was extremely disappointing to see Sarah Mullally arguing in favour of decriminalising abortion in tonight’s debate.
Christians are slaughtered en masse in Nigeria. King Charles is profoundly misguided.