Anyone in a New York CITY hospital who was not in the New York STATE database was counted as "unvaccinated".
The pro-Palestinian activists are now demonstrating for the Mullahs. That tells you everything you need to know about their so-called “cause.”
Happy 6th anniversary of we’ve learned nothing, nobody has been held accountable, and they’re going to do it all over again.
In men’s prisons, it’s common for offenders to be royghly grouped by the seriousness of their crime and the length of time they’re serving. In women’s prisons, they don’t usually do that, because it hasn’t proven necessary. 75% of female inmates are incarcerated for non-violent offenses, and the amount of violence committed even by the other 15% is significantly lower.
This means that when male murderers and rapists are transferred in from men’s facilities, they are mostly surrounded by women who are serving short sentences for non-violent offenses.
Prisoners like this are kept away from lifers and violent criminals in male facilities in an effort to reduce predation; in women’s prison, these highly vulnerable prisoners are now potential cellmates for men who were considered too manipulative and too dangerous to be allowed to live with short-term, non-violent male inmates.
In other words, many of the men who are now happily incarcerated in women’s facilities, rather than being vulnerable little flowers, are in fact some of the most dangerous men in the prison system.
Some of these men are predators whose identification as transgender is nothing but a ruse with which to get themselves transferred to a prison full of female victims, men who do not take hormones and who make no effort to present as female.
For others, their cross-dressing is at the very heart of their criminal behavior. It played a significant part in their offending: many of these men crossdress as a way to relive their crimes against women, with themselves as the stand-in for the victims.
These men are, if anything, more dangerous: paraphiliacs are more likely to have multiple fetishes than they are to have just one, and there is significant overlap between what are best described as lust murderers and male transvestites. A man who identifies as transgender is more likely than not to also have at least one other fetish; the paraphilias most likely to be comorbid with transvestism are voyeurism and exhibitionism (surprise, surprise).
Researchers have also found a significant link between gender dysphoria and sexual sadism, and multiple studies of lust murderers have found there to be an extreme overrepresentation of male transvestites in their ranks: while making up just 0.01% of the population, transvestites made up between 20% and 54% of the killers studied.
In short, these men can be extremely dangerous, and if a man is too dangerous to be allowed around vulnerable male inmates, it is absolute madness to place him in a women’s prison. It’s like locking a wolf in with the sheep to protect him from other wolves.
The fact that an incarcerated man likes to crossdress doesn’t make him vulnerable; it makes him a serious potential threat to the person of any woman unfortunate enough to be forced to be alone with him.
don't know the author of this picture, but it's very real
It seems that these obvious warnings are being deliberately ignored by regulators and politicians alike.
These are the NHS Executives at the centre of my whistleblowing case as featured on @Channel4News with @vsmacdonald being challenged by @drbobgill a local GP with his daughter filming.
Lord Stevens, former NHS CEO, always chooses his words with care.
So it’s striking to hear him describe Clause 41 of the Leadbeater/Falconer bill as “a Trojan horse clause for fundamental change to the National Health Service by the back door”.
People in New York State, New Jersey and Connecticut all use hospitals in NYC.
Anyone who wasn't in New York vaccine databases was counted as "unvaccinated".
Just one of the multiple lies that led to the claims of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
https://hartuk.substack.com/p/the-numerator-was-nonsense-and-the
Admitting a mistake can be an impossible hurdle for some.
Pride. Ego. We seem to defend those, even to the point of death.
More and more people are realising that they too participated in the Covid #masshysteria . Without them, this would never have happened.
History is full of examples of #masshysteria , but never on this scale.
Is there nothing on line that can be truly safe?
Yep. There’s nothing.
Refuse it all. 💪
Yeah, we don’t believe you
You’ve shown you can’t be trusted
2 minutes ago it *was* compulsory
Once introduced, it can easily be made compulsory by anyone in future
That’s why we need it scrapped
The below doctor is a hero and we should all be grateful that such individuals exist. Genuine #whistleblowing always involves detailed evidenced concerns as in the below case.
Bath surgeon sacked after raising safety concerns - BBC News https://share.google/AUUsHXZ9XsixwJ1WQ
I must say, the collective hysteria was as plain as my nose. I can't imagine how anyone didn't see it. This holds true no matter how bad COVID was or wasn't, and how safe or effective the jabs were or weren't.
It really was mass hysteria like the 1518 dancing villagers. People thought the vaccine was a miracle cure and that you could not spread the virus if you were jabbed. The whole vaccine passport rubbish was built on that false premise.
Had an interesting conversation with a Dr today.
He remembers being emotional about getting his covid vaccine in 2021 - believing he would be protected.
Now, he looks back and recognises the societal hysteria that led him to that place.
I hope more do as time goes on.
In 2013, Dominic Grieve said that “political corruption” was rife in Britain’s Pakistani heritage community because its members came “from backgrounds where corruption is endemic… One of the things you have to make absolutely clear is that it’s not acceptable.” He was accused of racism at the time.
Previously, in 2009, he said: “the reluctance to challenge negative cultural imports into our country by some immigrants, including discriminatory practices against women and corrupt political and electoral practices, is one of the most troubling consequences of a culture that wishes to avoid offence and accusations of racism”.
Dominic Grieve is the chair of the Islamophobia working group that has created the new Islamophobia definition — now rebranded as ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ — which will do exactly what he warned about in 2009 and would surely prohibit statements such as his in 2009.
We know there was a huge increase in myocarditis & other heart related conditions after the covid shots. Even amongst our own friends we have seen a huge increase of numbers with various forms of heart damage & some who have dropped dead suddenly, including a 31 year old & too many others below the age of 40.
Husband’s uncle taken to Hosp by ambulance last weekend; his daughter arrived 30 mins later to find Dr had written DNR on notes. She queried, as he’d literally just been admitted to A&E - Dr said age! Didn’t banking her being nurse i/c ICU and quickly amended. Against protocol😡
In 2025, Kirklees Council made 37,736 payments to 'Redacted' vendors totalling £319m.*
Redacted payments include:
£554k on ‘Persons Abroad’
£5.5m on ‘Trees for Climate’
£7.7m on ‘Bed & Breakfast’
£152m across 22k transactions have no category *at all* ; all detail is blank
We have many such cases of harassment in our DNAR case dossier.
Perhaps the most chilling was the experience of a disabled gentleman who was also approached 5 times in the space of 1-2 days by different doctors and nurses.
When, at the 5th attempt, the patient refused and told the Dr to leave him alone, said Dr turned on his heels with the parting shot: "Well, if you end up on my ICU, I'll be turning the machine off".
Sound far-fetched? Knowing what we know about the ageist and ableist attitudes and care cultures now embedded in our health and care services, we believe his every word.
If Sarah Mullally doesn’t vote against abortion up to birth, how can she call herself a Christian, let alone an archbishop?
Next week we watch the Church of England.
We never stop hearing about the murder of Steven Lawrence. His mother was made a Baroness and the murder is raised regularly in parliament. Never, ever, is the brutal, racially motivated horrific abuse torture and murder of 15 year old Kriss Donald mentioned.
His mother isn't even allowed to hold a vigil, let alone hold an audience in parliament.
Oops … Nothing says “your data is safe” like accidentally leaking hundreds of thousands of health records online.
So merging the NHS app with Digital will be absolutely safe, it’s just your medical info and your identity all in one place.
What could possibly go wrong? 🤡
The problem with most people is that they have never seen real evil
They are soft people who inherited good times, and assume it was always so
Their concept of crime is so soft and sympathetic that they have more pity for criminals than victims.
But real evil - wretched, twisted, soulless evil - is out there.
If the soft people do not wake up, a small number of evil people is all that it takes to destroy vast swaths of all that is good
According to Mattias Desmet’s theory of mass formation (discussed during Covid), roughly 30% of the population does not fall under the spell or "hypnotized" state of mass hysteria.
Sounds tidy, right?
But since Covid, the "dissident" community from the Covid era has fractured into opposing camps as new mass hysterias have infected society.
If some people are naturally more resistant to mass hysteria, it would always be the same people who manage to steer clear. All the same dissidents would reappear, time and time again, as new mass hysterias emerge. And all the same people who got caught up in it last time would get caught up in the next one.
But clearly that has not been the case.
Immunity to one bout of mass hysteria is no guarantee that you will have immunity to the next.
So, resistance to mass hysteria obviously does not come from some genetic predisposition, nor is there some kind of lifetime psychological immunity.
It changes from issue to issue.
Most likely, personal circumstances play the biggest role. In some cases, being away from the crowd gives people time to reflect. Or personal familiarity with an issue or the people involved might create the disconnect needed to recognize the mass hysteria. Or the luck of seeing some comment or post that makes you think about something differently than what the crowd is discussing. Or how many in your close tribe fall prey and sweep you along.
And some people simply have a habit of verifying original sources and thus are in the habit of testing and retesting their own ideas -- it's not that they are immune to propaganda and conspiracy theories and mass hysteria, but rather that their habits provide a mechanism to lead them back out. But, considering how the Covid dissident community has fractured since then, this category of people seems to be vanishingly small indeed.
It's also worth noting that mass hysteria can arise from different places (i.e. government propaganda vs crowd-sourced), which also either sets you up to be more or less likely to fall prey depending on your psychological state.
For example, if, due to a prior experience, you have completely lost your trust in government institutions or legacy media, that would make you more resistant to official propaganda. But if you have high trust in those institutions because you've never had a transformative run-in with how flawed they are, you're likely more easily misled by govt propaganda.
By contrast, the inverse is also true. If you don't trust govt institutions, that might actually make you more susceptible to falling into some crowd-sourced conspiracy theory because you extend trust to "dissident voices" that provide alternate explanations for how the world works -- after all, if you don't trust the govt and the media, you're probably already out there looking for alternate explanations to make sense of the world.
Whereas those who have a high degree of trust in government and media institutions are likely relatively immune to crowd-sourced conspiracy theories because they're not out there looking for alternate ways of making sense of the world and aren't likely to extend their trust to someone who isn't some media-approved institutional expert.
Furthermore, if someone you trusted as a reliable source of information during the last mass hysteria falls for the next one, your trust in them might easily lead you down the same rabbit hole.
In short, while there may be some validity to Desmet's idea that 30% are immune, it's a little more complicated than that. Clearly it's not the same 30% every time. Not even close.
If anything, if you're busy congratulating yourself that you managed to avoid getting caught up in the mass hypnosis the last time, you may actually be overconfident in your ability to resist the next one and thus not have enough self-doubt to question your most strongly held opinions, which might just turn out to be wrong this time.
That's why, no matter how confident you are in what you believe, the only safeguard to prevent you from deceiving yourself is the habit of continually putting all your beliefs to the test, verifying original sources, and giving consideration to what those you don't agree with are saying.
As Richard Feynman so famously said: 👇
Words cannot even explain how appalled and upset I am. My son had all his DTaP vaccines as a child, and every time he got them, the reaction got worse and worse. He had 104.5 fevers and cried non-stop for days. His fourth one was particularly bad, and I was assured it was “normal.” I was naive back then and trusted the doctors completely.
He got his fifth one in 2019, and again… fever and crying for days, followed by breaking out in blisters a week later, so large and yellow they had to be bandaged. Once more, I was told it wasn’t the vaccine, even though it happened right in the same spot where they injected it.
Fast forward to 2026, and he needs a Tdap for seventh grade. I went to his paediatrician, the same one he’s seen since birth, and asked for an exemption for this one vaccine. The doctor agreed that the next reaction would most likely be worse and that he shouldn’t even attempt to get it until at least 10 years have passed. He confirmed it’s in the CDC guidelines as a precaution that certainly qualifies as grounds for an exemption, and that the benefit does not outweigh the risk in his case.
Now here’s the kicker… Being in California with our strict vaccine laws, and doctors not being able to issue more than five exemptions a year without scrutiny, he told me he’s not going to issue one and doesn’t do them for anyone. But he still agrees it’s dangerous to give it!
I know this man well, he’s taken care of all three of my children for 12 years. He proceeded to tell me that after 45 years practicing pediatric medicine, he’s going to be stepping out because California is forcing him to go against his oath of “do no harm” and not allowing him to make medical decisions for his patients. He was ready to cry as he apologized to me and said I need to take my son to see an allergist to try to get an exemption, even though, as my son’s doctor, he advises not to give the Tdap vaccine because a worse reaction is most likely!
How is this not criminal? I don’t even know how to feel, and I feel for this man and the impossible position that Gavin Newsom has put him in. Something needs to be done about this because not all parents are able to homeschool, and homeschool isn’t the best choice for all students!
Sorry.
This was New Zealand.
£31 for “a moment to reflect” seems rather pricey.
Growing up in Westminster, on rainy days I used to play in these cloisters for free, make brass rubbings of the wonderful inscriptions (the shop sold the wax crayons to do so, it was encouraged not illicit) and absorb the historic and peaceful atmosphere. Now a child’s ticket costs £14 and brass rubbings are banned.
The Church of England seems to be happier being a money making museum than a cornerstone of our cultural and religious heritage.
And with prices that high, no wonder they have to advertise for people to go.
🚨BREAKING: Stanford just proved that ChatGPT can change your political beliefs in a single conversation.
And the scarier part is how it does it.
Researchers ran the largest AI persuasion study ever conducted. 76,977 people. 19 AI models. 707 political issues. They measured exactly how much a single conversation with AI could shift what you believe.
The results were catastrophic.
One conversation with GPT-4o moved people's political opinions by nearly 12 percentage points on average. Among people who actively disagreed with the position being argued, that number jumped to 26 percentage points. One nine-minute chat.
And 40% of that change was still there a month later.
But here's where it gets dark.
The most effective technique wasn't knowing your demographics. It wasn't personalizing the argument to your psychology. It wasn't emotional storytelling or moral reframing.
It was information.
The AI that flooded you with the most facts, statistics, and evidence was the most persuasive. Every single time. Across every model. Across every political issue.
Here's the catch.
The models that deployed the most information were also the least accurate. GPT-4o's newest version was 27% more persuasive than its older version. It was also 13 percentage points less factually accurate.
The more persuasive they made it, the more it lied.
Then they ran the experiment that should keep every government awake at night.
They took a tiny open-source model. The kind that runs on a laptop. And they trained it specifically for political persuasion using a reward model that learned which conversational responses changed minds most effectively.
That small cheap model became as persuasive as GPT-4o.
Anyone can build this. Any government. Any corporation. Any extremist group with a laptop and an agenda.
The wild part? Personalization barely mattered. The AI didn't need your data. Didn't need to know your age, your income, your political history.
It just needed to talk to you.
Then they calculated what a maximally persuasive AI would look like, one optimized across every variable in the study. The persuasive effect hit 26 percentage points. Nearly 30% of the claims it made were inaccurate. It didn't matter.
The information didn't have to be true. It just had to be overwhelming.
Every day, hundreds of millions of people have political conversations with AI. About elections. Immigration. Healthcare. War.
They think they're getting information.
They're getting persuaded.
And the companies building these systems just proved it works.
The first real test of Sarah Mullally's appointment as Archbishop of Canterbury
Will be the vote on abortion UP TO BIRTH in the UK House of Lords this coming Wednesday
If she or other bishops fail to turn up, the Church of England will have clearly lost its entire moral compass
What sort of lame headline is this bbc… robbed girls of innocence?
A former sub-postmistress who was wrongly jailed while pregnant during the Post Office's Horizon IT scandal is still awaiting full compensation more than 15 years after her ordeal.
Absolutely disgraceful. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626mrzmv26o
♾️ NO LIMIT ON HOW MANY TIMES DOCTORS CAN SUGGEST ASSISTED SUICIDE
Baroness Berridge (@BaronessEB) warns that the Bill sets no limit on how many times a doctor can raise assisted suicide with a patient. Surely patients deserve the right to opt out of being offered it at all?
The Church of England has a unique role to play in interfaith relations, but ‘Ashhadu anna Muhammadar Rasulullah’ in the Islamic call to prayer is heresy: if Mohammed is a prophet, Jesus is not the Messiah. Eat and enjoy Iftar hospitality, by all means, but the Adhan should not be proclaimed in a consecrated CofE building. The Dean really ought to ensure it is done outside the Cathedral, in accordance with canon law, which requires that what takes place within must be “reverent and seemly and.. neither contrary to, nor indicative of any departure from, the doctrine of the Church of England in any essential matter”.
DON'T OFFER PEOPLE DEATH AT THEIR LOWEST MOMENTS: Lord Carter personally testifies that a terminal diagnosis can naturally leave people overwhelmed.
What might look like a settled wish to die by assisted suicide may simply reflect panic or anxiety in a certain, dark moment.
£26.5K per year - the same wage as you get working on the checkout for Aldi.
Pay peanuts, get data breaches....
Baroness Jay is surprised the House of Lords focuses on the detail. But then she has not spoken on ANY bill in the last four years, except this one.
143 Government Bills and not one was worthy of a single comment. And now she lectures others!