2,400 year-old skeleton mosaic discovered in Turkey with the caption: “Be cheerful, enjoy your life”
The end of work as we know it.
IT IS Everyone’s JOB.
Read the series at http://ReadMultiplex.com.
Bayer is threatening to pull Roundup from the U.S. market if Congress won’t give them total immunity to poison Americans with glyphosate.
Let’s be clear:
This is a foreign company waging a propaganda war to seize control over our food system and independent farmers.
For the sake of our farmers’ independence and the sovereignty of our food system, Congress cannot fall for it.
Bayer made $2.8B from U.S. glyphosate sales in 2024.
They’re unlikely to walk away from that cash flow.
Their threat to exit the U.S. market is likely a weapon to coerce lawmakers, not a genuine threat.
If glyphosate actually vanished, our food supply would not fall apart.
Organic farming provides real-world proof:
These systems never use synthetic herbicides, yet they still produce substantial amounts of food every year.
Organic corn yields tend to be around 25% lower than conventional yields, but even a sizable yield difference would not translate into empty grocery shelves.
Why?
Because most glyphosate-treated corn is not grown for human consumption.
Over two-thirds of U.S. corn yield goes to ethanol and livestock feed.
The bottom line is this:
Bayer’s threats to pull Roundup are about leverage, not a looming food crisis.
This is a political power play to tighten Bayer’s control over our food system.
Read our full blog exposing Bayer’s coercive propaganda campaign below:🧵
A New York state Senate committee unanimously passed a bill that would hold AI companies liable for chatbots providing medical, legal, dental, psychological, and other licensed professional advice.
It's framed as consumer protection.
R to @JesslovesMJK: I had to take a photo of this dude, which I never do. It's just such a dear image.
Long shadows, sunset, cats, people.
It's quite the sight isn't it?
In a groundbreaking first, researchers have captured direct photographic and video evidence of corona discharges—faint, ethereal blue-violet glows (visible primarily in ultraviolet light)—flickering at the tips of tree leaves during thunderstorms.
For nearly a century, scientists hypothesized that the intense electric fields generated by passing thunderstorms could induce weak electrical discharges (coronae) on vegetation, as sharp points like leaf tips or needles concentrate charge and ionize surrounding air molecules, producing a subtle plasma glow. Lab experiments had shown this effect (e.g., faint blue emissions from spruce needles under controlled conditions), but confirming it in the wild proved elusive due to the discharges' dimness and the overwhelming ambient light.
That changed in summer 2024, when a team from Pennsylvania State University (led by meteorologist Patrick McFarland and advisor William Brune) developed a custom mobile observatory: a modified minivan (a 2013 Toyota Sienna) fitted with ultraviolet-sensitive cameras, specialized sensors, and a roof-mounted periscope-like setup to capture faint UV emissions from treetops.
During a thunderstorm in Pembroke, North Carolina (and in follow-up intercepts from Florida to Pennsylvania), they recorded dozens of corona events—41 on a single sweetgum tree branch over 90 minutes, each lasting up to ~3 seconds and sometimes hopping between leaves as branches swayed. Similar activity appeared on loblolly pine and other species. The coronae manifested as brief UV "sparkles" or bursts, invisible to the naked eye but detectable via the UV camera.
This marks the first direct, in-nature observation and quantification of tree coronae under real thunderstorms, published in Geophysical Research Letters on February 12, 2026.
The implications are significant:
- During a storm, vast swaths of forest canopy could shimmer with thousands of these tiny UV glows simultaneously—like a hidden swarm of fireflies across the treetops.
- Biologically, the discharges are energetic enough to subtly damage vegetation: singeing leaf tips, rupturing cell membranes, and impairing chloroplasts (key for photosynthesis). Repeated exposure might contribute to canopy stress or even influence evolutionary adaptations in tree shapes (e.g., smoother or less pointed structures to reduce charge concentration).
- Atmospherically, coronae could alter local air chemistry (producing reactive species like hydroxyl radicals) and potentially play a minor role in thunderstorm electrification or lightning initiation.
This discovery validates long-standing meteorological theory while opening new avenues for studying how atmospheric electricity interacts with and reshapes ecosystems.
[McFarland, P. J., et al. (2026). Corona Discharges Glow on Trees Under Thunderstorms. Geophysical Research Letters, 53(4), e2025GL119591. DOI: 10.1029/2025GL119591]
Never forget what the oligarchies did to their people. They knew, we knew, they knew that we knew, and they continued. Thanks to whistleblowers like @JesslovesMJK, a true patriot, a heroine.
When I say, "there's no such thing as voting the system we exist in", I am saying it in a literal sense.
Maybe this is one of points of it.
I'm sorry. Why is a CERN person acting as a spokesperson for this crap?
"A CERN spokesperson told us “anyone can upload content to Zenodo, which means that some publications may not fully comply with the rules.”"
@Kevin_McKernan @jikkyleaks @SciGuardians
Pedo Adjacent RetractionWatch cheers on the retraction of a paper trying to defend children’s health.
Are you not entertained?
Yes, RW is funded by close friends of Epstein: The Arnold Foundation.
You can’t despise these gatekeepers enough.
I am. So is Michael Burry. Also... AI bubble stuff...
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/michael-burry-adobe-stock-long-position-ai-bubble-1783071
"The purpose of that system is what it does: this system transfers control over capital allocation from elected governments and individual actors to an unelected technical infrastructure, using moral language as cover, with no democratic mechanism for appeal or reversal."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "One controlled what the world accepted as knowledge. The other controlled what was built from it. The Rothschild financial line ran through the whole thing."
"The thing that connects every thread in this story — the publishing programme, the intelligence operation, the banking architecture, artificial intelligence, the centralised ‘social good’, the research funding, and the institutional machinery now running through the BIS and the NGFS — is systems theory itself.
General systems theory. Input-output analysis. Cybernetics. The idea that you can manage any complex system through feedback and control, including humanity."
@brownstoneinst @Kevin_McKernan @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @NIHDirector_Jay
R to @JesslovesMJK: "The solution was to stop stabilising analogue money and replace it with digital money. The rollout would begin where no one could object: governments and charities, which pay no tax and serve ‘the public good’. But the ambition was larger. In a pitch to Richard Branson, Epstein called it a ‘social good currency’ and described it as ‘the most disruptive of all advances’, adding: ‘the financial system has outgrown its purpose’2."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Barnaby Marsh, one of Epstein's regular intellectual collaborators, annotated the same agenda226. Under the topic on power, he added: 'control of the masses via technology/communications, and implications for the possibilities (and dangers) of virtual democracy'. Under another, he wrote of 'the promise of emotional motivation and coordination of the great masses via spiritual ideals', noting that 'beliefs shape civilization' and that current methods were primitive."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "These two histories meet at the Bank for International Settlements, because that is where the clearinghouse model and the cybernetic model become the same thing. The NGFS scenarios classify. AI evaluates. Programmable money enforces."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Forester’s Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican is the ethical mission — inclusive, sustainable, and impossible to argue against. The BIS/NGFS pipeline is the financial vehicle — routing capital through scenarios, taxonomies, and programmable currency. The Epstein network was the diplomatic relay — carrying plans and specifications between the people who wrote the rules and the institutions that enforced them, protected by an intelligence operation and funded through the Rothschild banking line."
R to @JesslovesMJK: Christ. "If you read Altneuland not as a novel but as a blueprint, it describes a governance system built around a central clearinghouse: one body that controls all the flows, sets all the rules, and locks out anyone who refuses to comply."
R to @JesslovesMJK: WOW. "That same month, the most important academic paper behind the NGFS’s current set of scenarios — a study by Kotz and colleagues, which projected that climate change would reduce global income by nineteen per cent by 2050 — was retracted by the journal Nature200. The reason was that its results depended on a data error about Uzbekistan’s GDP. A mistake in a spreadsheet had helped determine how much capital every major bank in the world was required to hold. And there was no mechanism to go back and undo the damage. The scenarios kept running, with a note attached saying the underlying paper had been withdrawn. The capital requirements stayed in place."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07219-0
R to @JesslovesMJK: "The entire system’s control point comes down to one question: who turns the ethics that everyone agrees on into the specific numbers that the taxonomy encodes, that the scenarios are built on, that the AI checks against, and that the programmable money enforces?"
R to @JesslovesMJK: "In practice, the moment an ethical goal enters the system, it stops being a moral idea and becomes a number. ‘Climate action‘ becomes a damage estimate in a spreadsheet. ‘Gender equality‘ becomes a ratio. ‘Financial inclusion‘ becomes a metric. The second layer of the system — the one that judges — compares numbers against numbers, not values against values. The third layer — the one that enforces — carries out calculations, not convictions."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Who decides what ‘climate action‘ actually means in practice — which activities get classified as green, which number goes into a scenario model, which weighting gets applied to a bank’s capital requirements? The ethic is the cover. The standard is the instrument.
The NGFS is the network that turns ethical goals into financial rules, and its Scientific Advisory Committee is the body that does the translating."
R to @JesslovesMJK: EXACTLY
"This is the same basic design: AI systems measure what is happening, compare it against targets set by the executive branch, adjust their approach, and repeat — all without Congress debating or voting on any of it. And it is being built by the political administration least likely to be accused of building a centralised control system.
That is the point. The system doesn’t care about political ideology. It doesn’t matter whether the person in charge is left-wing or right-wing. All it needs is for someone to translate an objective into standards."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "What all of this amounts to, in plain terms, is a transfer of power over the economy away from elected governments.
And that power is then redirected towards a ‘social good’ you weren’t allowed to vote on, translated into standards you couldn’t realistically challenge, judged by AI that does not accept democratic input, and executed through money refusing to clear transactions running counter to the ‘social good’ you didn’t vote on."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Every one of these phrases points to the same thing: a target that the models are designed to aim for and that programmable money is designed to enforce. Whoever writes that definition — whoever decides what counts as a ‘social good’ — controls where money flows and where it is pulled away from. Because the moment a system labels one activity as compliant, everything not labelled automatically becomes non-compliant."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "The whole system needs just one thing to run: a definition of what counts as ‘good’. Right now, the NGFS models are built around climate risk. But the machinery doesn’t care what the goal is. Swap in a different objective — public health, protecting wildlife, reducing poverty, any of the seventeen UN Sustainable Development Goals — and the same system produces the same outputs: scenarios, classifications, rules about who gets capital and who doesn’t, and automatic enforcement."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "What the NGFS and BIS have built is, at institutional scale, the same cybernetic governance system that Pergamon Press published the theory for, that Beer tried to build in Chile, and that Epstein’s funded researchers prototyped — from the AI classification systems to the cryptographic infrastructure to the transaction processor that preceded the unified ledger."
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Put them together and you have the components of a currency that can check whether a transaction complies with a set of rules automatically: AI to sort and classify, a rulebook to define what counts as acceptable, and programmable money to enforce the decision."
Someone open-sourced a tool that REMOVES LLM CENSORSHIP in 45 minutes 🤯
It’s called Heretic. Instead of fighting with complex prompts to bypass safety filters, you run one single command and it permanently deletes the model's ability to refuse a prompt.
• Fully automatic (Zero config required)
• Preserves the model's raw intelligence
• Works on Llama, Qwen, Gemma, and dozens of others
• Runs locally on consumer hardware
100% Open Source.
R to @JesslovesMJK: "Epstein was the exception. He was the one person who moved between all the compartments: the publishing lineage, the research funding, the intelligence architecture, the banking relationships, the digital currency specifications, the institutional placements. A cooperating Epstein in a federal courtroom could have done what no specialist could — connected the fields."
So Greece is sending ships to defend Cyprus from the Persians.
What year is this again?