The complete open-source audit behind the Senate exchange is now published. Primary source evidence, ISO 19011 methodology, and open review architecture—anyone can verify or challenge every finding.
Designed to be falsifiable and replicable.
http://github.com/paulrekaris/TGA-COVID19-Vaccine-Safety-Monitoring-Audit
It's not just myocarditis.
There are other safety signals that were suppressed by the @NIH all the way back to 2022.
This chart is from today's SEER data, 2 years behind.
Ovarian cancer.
p53.
#NIHgate
@weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @BrokenTruthTV
@SenRonJohnson @NIHDirector_Jay @Fynnderella1 @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @HouseLyndseyRN @unhealthytruth @BrianneDressen
https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html
Dr. Dan Edney, reported to be in the running for head of CDC, says he gets a “pertussis booster” regularly “to protect other infants and children that might be around me, that I’m not spreading pertussis to them.”
This “doctor” doesn’t even know that pertussis vaccine, while reducing symptoms, does not prevent infection and transmission. Hence, getting this product makes him more likely to remain around infants and children and unknowingly spreading pertussis. That’s just the basic science.
As the FDA explains: “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.” Or see quotes from the consensus paper by the purported world leading experts in pertussis vaccine below:
Edney’s claim: https://www.wdam.com/2025/05/14/pertussis-cases-increasing-mississippi-across-country/
FDA source: https://www.fda.gov/media/181937/download
Consensus paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333640/
I have several email exchanges with Abbasi on a research were we demonstrated numerous mistakes and incongruities in the data that were not captured by the peer review process. They allowed the authors to change the data without mentioning where the change stemmed from, why they changed it. Serious infringements of COPE guidelines and the BMJ refused to publish the letter of concern on that study as it would demonstrate the oversight and biased review process.Turn a blind eye when appropriately needed, for patients to loose chances.
Here you go for respect of integrity and science.
@MartinZ_uncut
My recommendations for FDA reform made at the Kennedy Center to members of the FDA and the public.
I can tell you @pgtzsche1 why the @bmj_latest character assassinated @SecKennedy.
Because they are funded by GSK and Merck who make huge profits from vaccines.
@KamranAbbasi does their bidding.
It's been going on since @DrAndyWakefield, but you never believed him.
#BMJgate
Great point! Endlessly agitating the immune system is not a harmless process it burns out the immune system. In the onset of #immunetolerance from the really nasty vaccines a robust immune response is produced initially but then exhausts into tolerance
Video of my talk at the Kennedy Center this week in which I got to tell members of FDA, CDC, etc., the desperately needed changes they need to make!
(0:00) Intro by Senator Ron Johnson
(14:23) Aaron Siri Begins Presentation
(17:02) Why Vaccine Companies Can Kill With Impunity
(25:34) Current Epidemic of Chronic Childhood Diseases
(30:59) FDA’s Abject Failure to Assure Safety Pre-Licensure
(47:42) FDA Reforms
(49:22) CDC’s Abject Failure to Assure Safety Post-Licensure
(1:09:15) CDC Reforms
(1:10:33) HRSA Reforms
(1:11:18) NIH Reforms
(1:11:58) CMS Reforms
(1:13:28) HHS Reforms
(1:17:18) Depoliticizing Vaccines
(1:19:33) Mandates Are Illegal and Immoral
Received An update on Robert
YALL HE WENT FOR A JOG FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 4 YEARS
!!!!!!!!!!
THIS PROTOCOL IS WORKING @KevinMcCairnPhD @CharlesRixey
its a beautiful day to save some lives ~<3
Lets Go!!
~Nurse Lyndsey
Finally! Soon-Shiong (SS) was the owner of LA Times during the Pandemic. LA Times thwacked anybody who dissented with the party line including those who claimed Turbo cancers, cures for which is what SS, the FDA renegade, is hawking now.
He knows how to pick the winning team.
1- OSPA?
Let's go deep into how OspA (Outer Surface Protein A) potentially induces autoimmunity through molecular mimicry and immune system dysregulation.
This is a case study in how a superficially clever v@ccine design collided with the real complexity of the immune system.
This is an important day, Alex. DM me, I have a manuscript for you. This is not the one I want to share, but it's a start. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262876832_Methodological_Issues_and_Evidence_of_Malfeasance_in_Research_Purporting_to_Show_Thimerosal_in_Vaccines_Is_Safe
I badly want to believe in non-respiratory virus vaccines, and I think I still do.
But seeing health bureaucrats and drugmakers push flu and Covid shots on kids gives me qualms.
I KNOW the data - and they're lying about the value of those shots. How do I trust them on the rest?
They make it too easy https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1517719113
1. This account was hacked on 18 March. Thanks to a legal letter & appeals by friends like @LeilaniDowding & @stkirsch I've just recovered access. Full story explained in reply.
But I’ve been unable to remove thousands of posts & reposts made by hackers between 20-23 March.
Actual footage from the editorial review process.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1242147/The-false-pandemic-Drug-firms-cashed-scare-swine-flu-claims-Euro-health-chief.html
The 'false' pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief
By FIONA MACRAE FOR THE DAILY MAIL
17 January 2010
AI could replace outpatient doctors tomorrow.
Not because AI is brilliant.
Because medicine today isn’t.
Obesity? Drug.
Hypertension? Drug.
Diabetes? Drug.
LDL? Drug.
Every patient. Every country.
100% management. 0% reversal.
That’s not medicine. That’s a vending machine.
🧵
Good. I don't trust billionaires who make money from pharma sales whilst masquerading as a pharma skeptic.
Especially when they run their trials through the media instead of actual clinical trials.
Private paed said to me at least get the measles jab if no other and explained encephalitis. I said thanks, went home and read insert and found encephalitis as a side effect of jab! Needless to say no vaccines at all and no health issues
Noelia Castillo Ramos será la primera persona en recibir la eutanasia por depresión en España.
¿La causa? Nadie te la dirá.
En 2022, Noelia sufrió una violación múltiple en un centro tutelado. Esto destrozó su vida por completo, lo que le llevó a un intento de suicidio fallido que la dejó parapléjica.
El sistema le ha fallado y ahora le ofrece la eutanasia como remedio.
Should we tell the reporter the polio vaccine can cause 'vaccine-derived' polio and the measles vaccine can give kids measles @Jikkyleaks?
The claim that measles was 'passaged' through monkey cell lines to weaken it is basically what they were doing at Wuhan in 2019. That went well didn't it?
https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2025-DON578
@MaryanneDemasi @SenatorAntic @delbigtree
These fuckers are relentless.
Reminds me of several other grim facts which demonstrate the gross negligence of regulators in the pandemic response, and how accuracy in recording and reporting outcomes (or even practicing ethical science) hasn't been on their list of priorities from the beginning.
Pfizer and Moderna lost their long-term control groups:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
Pfizer's XBB.1.5 update for Omicron received EUA approval even though it was only tested on 20 mice with no control group nor human trials:
https://www.cdc.gov/acip/downloads/slides-2023-09-12/10-COVID-Modjarrad-508.pdf
All kinds of deaths were being labeled as COVID deaths, e.g. Birx saying "if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death:"
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-april-7-2020/
Early PCR tests were unable to distinguish influenza from SARS-CoV-2:
https://archive.ph/TBixE
By January 2022, people were having difficulty discerning between flu, allergies, colds, and covid, so regulators released guidance:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220103192308/https://newsinhealth.nih.gov/2022/01/it-flu-covid-19-allergies-or-cold
They originally only recommended remdesivir as a treatment, even though they knew almost 2 years prior (April 2020) that remdesivir "failed to speed the improvement of patients with Covid-19 or prevent them from dying," and that "it appeared 13.9% of the remdesivir patients had died compared to 12.8% of patients in the control arm."
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/23/data-on-gileads-remdesivir-released-by-accident-show-no-benefit-for-coronavirus-patients/
(Just a coincidence: "Remdesivir was developed through an academic-corporate partnership between Gilead Sciences and the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health."
https://sph.unc.edu/sph-news/remdesivir-developed-at-unc-chapel-hill-proves-effective-against-covid-19-in-niaid-human-clinical-trials/
"they hoped to inoculate them with chimeric S proteins, which were proposed to be developed through a subcontract in the grant in Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, not in Wuhan. Baric did not respond to The Intercept’s request for comment."
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/)
VAERS was ignored despite it being industry knowledge that VAERS deaths are underreported, with one study finding underreporting by "a factor of 20." This study also implies regulators' scientific neglect, stating, "existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced mortality risk (VMR):"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
Those surveillance studies weren't designed for VMR, even though the CDC had a "working list of possible adverse event outcomes" from the shots, including life-threatening outcomes such as:
-Stroke
-Myocarditis/pericarditis
-Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
-Vaccine-enhanced disease
-Guillain-Barre syndrome
-Kawasaki disease
-A lot more
https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
Slide 16 is leaked at 2:33:40 in this public presentation: https://youtu.be/1XTiL9rUpkg?t=9220
Despite being a fundamental concept of morality and medicine encoded in law, informed consent was virtually non-existent during the pandemic response. It was more of an "uninformed coercion." If you're doing science and medicine right—if you want to transparently track outcomes of your well-intentioned novel pharma nanotech—then surely you want willing, informed participants involved long-term. Yet, this principle wasn't practiced:
"(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks."
Source: 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3
Their guidance had the principle on paper, but their practice didn't line up with their own standards:
"the statute requires that FDA ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances:
-That FDA has authorized emergency use of the product;
-Of the significant known and potential benefits and risks associated with the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown;
-That they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product and of any consequences of refusing administration of the product; and
-Of any available alternatives to the product and of the risks and benefits of available alternatives."
https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download
Available effective alternatives like ivermectin were obfuscated and discouraged, e.g. the FDA's "You are not a horse" propaganda and pharmacies refusing to fill scripts. When going out, graduating, being employed was contingent on getting the jab, people didn't feel like they had an option to accept or refuse it. Significant potential risks were not disclosed but hidden, e.g. FDA slide 16 and fact sheets being unavailable at doctors' offices and pharmacies. Most people still don't understand how the EUA worked, let alone how the new nanobiotechnology works. The Right to Try Act is a great idea and law and had much potential during the response, but I didn't see it become a great force. And a shroud of secrecy still remains over it all, with no ray of accountability on the horizon.
None of this is even to mention the regulators' failure to abide by their own pandemic response plans re: implementation of novel NPIs. They broke their own rules and went against their own advice:
https://x.com/MatthewMillerSC/status/1972322360146440364/photo/2
"Worldwide, we are currently in an unprecedented situation with regard to the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic, where countries are using isolation and lock-down measures to control the spread of infection. This is a scenario generally not much anticipated by previous theory, and in particular, there has been little attention paid to the question of extinction as a means to eradicate the virus; the prevailing view appears to be that this is unfeasible without a vaccine."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.10.20171454v3
The COVID pandemic response was not the practice of science, medicine, nor governing: It was the practice of witchcraft and warfare, a perversion of civilization's greatest tools into fifth-generation weapons used to enforce an internationally-coordinated tyranny against the life, limb, and liberty of every person on earth.
Ok, then someone made it.
Who?
X locked my account for reposting this↑↓
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2036640761484292602
Thanks X
:)
🚨The people trusted the regulators when they promised to ensure they would intensive safety monitoring of a novel drug that was being forced on every working person.
They lied.
No monitoring was done.
Not only did the TGA take huge sums of money from the pharma companies to rush the new and untested genetic vaccines through approval, but they stopped us asking the questions that we knew would expose their abrogation of duty.
Then they tied us in administrative knots.
5 years and multiple FOIAs later, the trickle of information that has been obtained shows that no monitoring of cancers or pregnancies or even deaths happened.
It was all a lie.
#TGAgate
@SenatorAntic
@MaryanneDemasi @MRobertsQLD @TonyNikolic10 @Fynnderella1 @RWMaloneMD @ThomasWelch15 @SuellenW @RennickGBR
When Australians were told they were in the largest vaccine trial they were reassured all safety measures had been followed. But did it happen?
Watch as Senator Roberts calls out the TGA for not following their own vaccine safety plan
@prekas23 @Jikkyleaks @MaryanneDemasi
ICU Nurse, Tiffany Dover, was one of the 1st people in the world to get a COVID mRNA injection...within 30 seconds on national TV, she collapsed.
Meanwhile how they actually made COVID.
On Friday I go into the studio with THE Chris Wallin @thechriswallin from @basterecords to record my song written in tribute to @Charliekirk11 all on the heels of joining @TRobinsonNewEra on May 16th for what will be the biggest demonstration of freedom the world has ever seen. Thankful to God for the opportunities and all glory to Him
the LORD asked who shall I send?
I answered SEND ME!
NURSE LYNDSEY IS GOING TO JAPAN YALL
Stay tuned…
@Jikkyleaks @RWMaloneMD @SecKennedy @Fynnderella1 @Kevin_McKernan @KevinMcCairnPhD @CharlesRixey @ChildrensHD @VacSafety @Honest_Medicine
@SabinehazanMD @NicHulscher @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund @JessicaVaugn @MaryBowdenMD
I wrote the articles and the soundtrack.
May I present: Nicole Junkermann 👇
A deep trawl on how to make the worst product safety signals in history go away https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n810/rr-28 5 years later we are supposed honour studies that show infinitesimal effects. Anyone fancy an Epstein style massage? @sayerjigmi
its clear @DrMakaryFDA is in @johnarnold pocket
both have to go, Makary first
TRIF bridge cGAS-STING and TLR3 signaling
TRIF induces activation of TBK1, leading to the transcription of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines by IRF3/7 and NF-κB
Point: Trigger could be Aluminum cations.🧐
https://x.com/i/grok/share/224722073ba14cf2aabcf04b8626b8f7
my posts are cryptic sometimes🙃
This paper shows the opposite of what the authors claim.
Imagine two groups of people. One group is socioeconomically deprived and as such more likely to die of violence, undiagnosed fentanyl overdoses and suicides. This group are more likely to be unvaccinated.
By contrast, the vaccinated will have a lower mortality because of who they are, not what they are injected with. The study itself proves this - influenza vaccination also "prevented" sudden death. Nobody thinks flu jabs stop cardiac arrest. That's healthy vaccinee bias.
Finding lower mortality in the vaccinated tells you nothing about vaccine risks or benefits.
But the forest plot below gives the game away.
If being vaccinated gives you an odds ratio of 0.57 (i.e. only 57% of the mortality rate) because of who you are, why does a single dose give 0.88?
Something after that first dose is pushing mortality back up. And then two or more doses drops to 0.53 - lower than the overall figure. Why? Because people who died after dose one never got dose two. That is a survivorship bias.
But there is more...
When you cannot compare two groups you can instead compare the same person's risk before and after an event. That works for medical diagnoses but there is a problem when measuring death.
Dead people don't get vaccinated!
There is therefore no mortality rate in the vaccinated before they were vaccinated.
What they were really doing is comparing the vaccinated mortality to the WHOLE POPULATION mortality - including those most at risk of dying - which is obviously too high.
When they showed the rates were the same in the 6 weeks after injection as this baseline, that is not reassuring. These are the healthy people. Their rate should have been lower. Finding it the same is a sign that the vaccines were harmful.
👆
Samalla myös k-piikkien DNA-kontaminaatiota käsittelevä asiantuntijapuheenvuoro jäi komiteassa pitämättä ..
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2036161217593745656?s=20