Impf_Info – Following Feed 1,284 Posts (gefiltert)

The one on the left is that IHME where IHME Board = Halton 🇦🇺 IHME Independent Advisory Cttee = Sutton🇦🇺 https://x.com/FeeRedfern/status/1925808073790062686?s=20 https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/transcribed-twit-thread-on-mr-big https://healthdata.org/about/governance https://healthdata.org/about/governance-iac

THIS

So the polio vax gave people polio. Who’d a thunk?

What @ScienceMagazine is trying to say is that the polio vaccine virus strains cause polio, so they tried to stop giving one of the strains and found it was too late. The vaccine virus is now epidemic because they overused it. Nice work, science. https://archive.md/GjeXv

WHOA! Clear-as-day, in-your-face example of how whoever controls the data controls what you are told. This is what is happening to the "real world data" publications that you are being fed. @jsm2334 @MaryanneDemasi @jeffreytucker @Fynnderella1 @DrJulieSladden @RMConservative

The eyes that need to see it do ⚕️⚖️🔜 This same situation for the first ACIP cancellation, now the " leak " But nothing published on time in the Federal Register *Twice*.

I think people who do government service especially anything going against a certain narrative should have more protection and attention given to the issues they raise on being targeted and attacked. I don’t know why RFK jr or Jay B or even the White House couldn’t weigh in publicly in a general way. What’s happening is despicable criminal harassment with career ending consequences. I’m fighting now because I have no choice but I do have much on my plate and don’t want to waste my remaining time on earth answering to never ending investigations. Persecution causes suffering and quenched creativity that is badly needed for innovation within academia.

Someone in the administration is trading before official government data releases. You can see it in the options markets.

*** this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb: "members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA"***

Mystery solved : the NYT article was edited roughly 24 hours after original publication & the report added. https://x.com/canceledmouse/status/2033952611179667594

This is extremely problematic that @CR_AACR @AACR @AACR_CEO just did this for manuscripts published two decades ago. They have succumbed to the wishes of PubPeer to destroy careers and silence science that questions pharma products. The AACR is highly supported by big pharmaceutical companies and may have possible sold out. As a 30+ year loyal member of AACR with many hundreds of presentations over the years including the most in the world in some recent years, I am deeply saddened by what has happened with the pollution of PubMed records with "concerns" on old publications in @CR_AACR. Perhaps AACR's conflicts should be investigated given the aggressive handling of anonymous concerns with hiding behind policies and guidelines and not listening to the seriousness of what PubPeer has been doing to the field. I had previously offered to advise AACR on very important issues related to research integrity, PubPeer, public trust but this was ignored. Damaging reputations of innocent individuals requires the attention of our professional societies as US science continues to be damaged. I have called on @HHSGov and @NIH to weigh in on the weaponization of post peer-review platforms such as PubPeer and the consequences that include never ending professional harassment through never-ending investigations, contacting employers and journals. This has been leading for many innocent individuals to reputational damage that threatens personal and professional livelihood, grant funding and the ability to make meaningful contributions to the field. @HHSGov @DrTonyLetai @KimrynRathmell @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @CR_AACR @SenRonJohnson @Kevin_McKernan @kaelin_lab @LocasaleLab @P_McCulloughMD @RandPaul @SenBillCassidy @TheCancerLetter @JanciToxDoc @KUPERWASSERLAB @SabinehazanMD @Melchizedek1972 @danaparish @xazalbert @MaryanneDemasi @ryanjamesjessup @Oncotarget @MAHA_Institute @efenigson @DrPatrick @jeffreytucker @Jikkyleaks

CHEESINT strikes again. (Like OSINT but funkier.)

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (@Stanford) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…” “The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.” “If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.” “The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.” 🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize. ⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend. While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s @ScienceMagazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics). Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility. 📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best: “There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.” 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. @realDonaldTrump @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay @DrJBhattacharya @elonmusk @NIH @HHS_ORI @aaas

I posted this comment in response to an article by @ClareCraigPath There was an immediate comment from Jessica Hockett (PANDA linked to Nick Hudson) to suggest Clare delete my comment. JH's comment has since been deleted but I have a copy in my emails. I wonder why she would have done that? What was it about the post she really didn't like? Maybe the links between Blackrock, funding generally and the Pandemic Collective. (@MindandEmotion7 links to Epstein?) It's not like I mention the pandemic insurance scam that the actuaries supported. Where they hype the risks and then charge higher insurance then when not so many people died they didn't have to pay out type thing. @Jikkyleaks Nope, I never mentioned that in this case. In fact there is nothing even two years on that seems incorrect. Original post from June 2024. "There is a huge effort going on to detract from the likely fact that the initial covid spread was deliberate and specifically targetted at certain populations. Some non biological factors supporting this view..... There were two important documents issued in 2019 that indicate it was a well planned attack. 1. Blackrock issued a report mid 2019 in which they said a crisis was coming and their recommendations were for the FED to issue money to non banking institutions (rather than to the banks as happened in 2008). Lockdown was partly to stop all the injected money being spent and inflation going sky high. Instead it was directed to certain businesses like Amazon for example. 2. Event 201 in Wuhan Oct 2019 in which delegates were issued with specific instrutions as to what to do in the event of a pandemic of what sounded almost identical to Covid. This was where the use of ventilators was stated. @JesseMatchey commented on Twitter "I think if we start asking why West Exec Avril Haines was on Event 201 with CDC, George Gao, we may get somewhere. She also advised Open Philanthropy, which was part of the “Pandemic Collective”, a group of NGOs that had monthly calls about global pandemics, for the past decade. The same George Gao that was part of Global Virome Project, based at the One Health Institute UC Davis DEFUSE was their solution (problem, reaction, solution), to being able to get the world to submit to this Carte blanche mRNA, Crispr, OneHealth was the objective…SARS2 was the buy-in." Angela Merkel visited the German Lab in Wuhan in 2019. People returning from the World Military Games held in Wuhan in Sept 2019 reported feeling ill with a unusual virus. They would have spread it to several countries. That's just some of it there is far more. The dangers of covid may not yet be fully apparent. The best bioweapons are slow to act. I would dearly have loved to say it is all behind us, but that is far from the case. Prion diseases (5-10 yrs on ) cannot be ruled out. We cannot rule out that covid itself may have increased cancer rates. Shedding is a huge concern (see link below). This presentation given on 1st June 2024 to the Canadian inquiry is sobering in the extreme. Shedding does appear to be happening and therefore we are all at risk in different ways. Blood and tissue banks are not being protected. https://x.com/hervk102/status/1797982431498117246 We have to stop giving any more mRNA shots. We must have easy access to cheap Vit D Zn Ivermectin and other treatment options. For as long as injections are being given covid will circulate and excess deaths will continue. We have to break the cycle. Playing down the harms is not helping us find the real perpetrators nor solutions to what is happening now and is to come. We have to recognise the full effect of the possible harms, stop the possibility of iatrogenic harms in future and stop another deliberate release/ scam. It has to be all three not just one of them. The alternative is bleak."" One Health has still not gone away and there is still a lot of money in pandemic planning and insurance. We have elevated cancer levels and lack of data to show harm. We still have a way to go to stop this madness happening again in same or modified form. This was just one of the notable points Clare raised in the article. One which hardly ever gets mentioned: "There are actually four laboratories in Wuhan. The other three were a Chinese CDC lab, which worked on bat coronaviruses and had a lower safety authorisation than WIV, a military lab and a German-Chinese viral laboratory in Union hospital. The fact these never get mentioned is a story in itself. The Union hospital laboratory was the base for a German-Chinese virology collaboration, which included the WIV and Tongji Medical College and had already received over a decade of government funding. The research aimed to create vaccines and treatments for chronic viruses including HIV. The lead German virologist was Ulf Dittmer who has links to Christian Drosten. Christian Drosten had apparently started work on a PCR test in 2019 a week before the Chinese had said the pneumonia had been caused by a coronavirus and published inaccurately on asymptomatic spread in January 2020. He worked in collaboration with scientists at WIV and his hospital has close contacts with Tongji hospital. Ultimately, I cannot tell you who made it based on this evidence, only that it was man made." [Bold added by myself]

I just started supporting you. I hope more people will. You are an excellent journalist and I hope you keep on reporting about subjects the MSM rarely touches. Thank you for your courage!

Don't worry about the pharmaceuticals... Most of your seed oils are made using similar processes dissolved in industrial hexane. When you start seeing seed oil supplies interrupted, never buy then again.

"The data collected by authorities from IVF clinics is far too generalized, and detecting safety signals in these datasets may be impossible or delayed by years." @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse The vaxx pushers may feign outrage when I point out that they have

🚨Breaking #ACIPgate: someone didn't cover their tracks. There was one official leak. It went to @MaryanneDemasi to publish (hence the use of the word "exclusive" - which means the story was given to her and only her) because she is the only trusted journalist with the credentials and experience to handle the leak properly within US law. But this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb: "members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA" Is this why the meeting was shut down - because they were going to blow #plasmidgate open? And if so, who leaked that to the New York Times in order to derail the meeting and create a false story about Demasi's reporting? There is NO mention of plasmid contamination in the Demasi report. If this was a confidential part of the meeting agenda it should not have been leaked to the Times and as it doesn't appear in Demasi's article or the leaked document that means that someone else was leaking to the times. Who? @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @jeffreytucker @AGHuff @Fynnderella1 @docbiss Full NYT article here: https://archive.md/18YDV

https://x.com/i/status/2033649028806939140 🚨 Dernières nouvelles : L'histoire du chien « guéri grâce à un vaccin à ARNm » est devenue virale, mais il s'agissait d'un canular. Le chien n'était pas guéri et ce que l'histoire omettait de mentionner, c'est qu'il avait en réalité été traité avec le nouvel inhibiteur PD-L1 de Merck, récemment mis sur le marché pour les tumeurs mastocytaires. Je me fiche complètement de savoir quelle IA était ouverte sur leur ordinateur à un moment donné au cours de ce processus. Toute cette histoire a été fabriquée de toutes pièces pour faire la promotion du gilvetmab tout en vous conditionnant à accepter l'ARNm comme traitement contre le cancer, alors que c'est souvent le contraire. Pour mémoire, l'UNSW reçoit chaque année des millions de dollars de financement de la part de l'industrie pharmaceutique. Voir le tweet suivant pour l'aveu concernant l'utilisation de l'inhibiteur de point de contrôle. https://animalcancercareclinic.com/immunotherapy-offers-new-hope-for-dogs/

1/2 My comment👇 Public Comment Submission to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) https://www.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2026-0199-2405 My name is Hanna Parikka. I’m writing to you as a former academic reproductive health professional with 20 years’ experience as an IVF biologist (equivalent to embryologist) in Finland. Since the gene-based Covid vaccines rollout, I have had extreme concerns about the lack of safety data, pharmacovigilance, transparency, precautionary principle, accountability, informed consent, professional ethics & competence as well as free speech in scientific and ethical issues in our society and amongst us professionals. We were told by the authorities that the safety signals have been closely monitored and nothing of concern has been found. I would like to ask: who is monitoring, where are the written guidelines and who is responsible for the collected data? I know as a professional that concerning the Covid vaccines, there were no instructions or requirements for traceability from the authorities. The IVF field could have been the perfect early-warning system - why wasn't it implemented? This is not a question of IVF, but possible safety signals which could be seen especially in the IVF laboratory, and which possibly could explain the decline in global fertility & birth rates. IVF field could have been able to detect some biological disturbances long before they become visible as reduced fertility outcomes. Known risks associated with gene-based Covid vaccines (e.g. lipid nanoparticles, spike protein, modified mRNA, residual DNA, SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences) may also affect fertility at a very early stage, which can lead to problems with cell or early embryo quality, implantation issues, or very early miscarriage. Also, we cannot think in a way that we aren’t seeing any safety signal if the child is born alive. IVF outcome tracking should have been mandatory from 2021 onward. Failing to do so was not only a complete scientific failure, but especially a moral failure born of haste, political pressure and institutional capture. Since the introduction of Covid vaccines some professionals (me included) in the IVF field have shared their concerning observations in the IVF clinics, e.g. less mature oocytes (MII), degenerating oocytes and embryos, lower blastocyst formation, impaired quality of eggs, sperm and embryos, unusual findings in PGT (pre-implantation genetic testing), implantation failures, increased miscarriages and impaired sperm quality. The fundamental problem is that there are no requirements or guidelines provided by the authorities for the monitoring of safety signals, and the information of patients’ vaccination status is not provided – this makes it very difficult to find any safety signals linked to the gene-based Covid vaccines in the IVF lab. Thus, you won’t probably find anything. (Continues...👇)

Childhood and adult deaths suspected and registered. My presentation from 2024. Also pointed out by Dr Julie Sladden Jessica Rose and others - They undertook antigen tests in car parks!

Ha ha... more confirmation that the vaxx pushers are so st00pid they don't even know what they don't know! 😂😂😂😂😂 @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/i/156151246/the-wider-scientific-community-is-not-doing-its-job-either

Clinical trial fraud costs lives. By anchoring raw trial data to the #BSV ledger in real-time, researchers create an immutable audit trail. No more adjusting results after the fact. Transparency = Trust. #MedicalResearch #Blockchain

A rogue Fed judge ordered the ACIP meeting canceled. Many are in DC on their own dime for the meeting, away from patient care, and now it’s canceled. Pathetic.

1/ Let this be a reminder that the last time a judge made a ruling in favor of a vaccine, the exact same day Merck announced they were building a new factory in the area. 😒😒😒 https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/merck-manufacturing-north-carolina-vaccines/742146/

R to @Jikkyleaks: 50% response rate, just like Rosie. "Safe and effective". "If it works for your dog.. maybe it can work for you". This is how pharma sells drugs. https://www.drugs.com/vet/gilvetmab.html

R to @Jikkyleaks: Gilvetmab is licensed for the treatment of canine mast cell tumours. https://x.com/i/status/2032962863191699837

🚨 Breaking: The story about the dog "cured with an mRNA vaccine" went viral but was fake. The dog wasn't cured and the bit missing from the story was that it was actually treated with Merck's new PD-L1 inhibitor, newly introduced for mast cell tumours. I don't even care about which AI was open on their computer at some point during this process. The whole story was manufactured to advertise gilvetmab at the same time as to condition you to accept mRNA as a cancer therapy when it is often the opposite. For the record, UNSW takes millions of dollars in pharma funding every year. See next tweet for the admission about using the checkpoint inhibitor. https://animalcancercareclinic.com/immunotherapy-offers-new-hope-for-dogs/

This will get overturned. It is well enshrined in FACA law that the sitting Secretary can appoint and fire members on their own authority and based on the charter of the committee. It is also wildly political to do this two days before hearing. What a joke https://apple.news/ApdfOJLXMRa6jX6NyylqHdQ

This is the docket text: Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary relief is GRANTED in part. (i)    The Court STAYS the January 2026 Memo revising the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 705. (ii) The Court STAYS the appointments of the thirteen ACIP members appointed on June 11, 2025, September 11, 2025, and January 13, 2026. (iii) The Court further STAYS all votes taken by the now-stayed ACIP. (MBM) CM/ECF - USDC Massachusetts - Version  1.8.5 as of 12/19/2025

I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. The largest for-profit hospital system in the United States. One hundred and eighty-two hospitals. Twenty states. I oversee a spreadsheet called the chargemaster. It has 42,000 line items. Each line item is a price. The prices are not real. I need to be precise about that. They are not estimates. Not approximations. Not market rates. They are anchors. An anchor is a number you set high so that every negotiated discount feels like a victory. No relationship to cost. No relationship to value. A relationship to leverage. My team sets the anchors. That is the job. The price is correct. Take a drug. Keytruda. Immunotherapy. Treats sixteen types of cancer. The manufacturer charges approximately $11,000 per dose. That is the acquisition cost. What the hospital pays. My team enters it into the chargemaster. They do not enter $11,000. They enter $43,000. That is the gross charge. The gross charge is a fiction. No one pays it. No one is expected to pay it. The gross charge exists so that when Blue Cross negotiates a 68% discount, they pay $13,760, and the contract says "68% discount" and both parties feel the transaction was rigorous. A 68% discount on a fictional price produces a real price that is 25% above acquisition cost. That margin is where I live. My 2025 compensation was $26.5 million. Eighty percent of my bonus is tied to EBITDA. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is also earnings before the patient opens the bill. Same dose of Keytruda at the hospital across town. Gross charge: $12,000. Blue Cross rate: $10,200. Same drug. Same dose. Same needle. Same cancer. Different spreadsheet. The CMS transparency data showed the ratio between the highest and lowest negotiated price for the same drug at the same hospital can reach 2,347 to one. Not 2x. Not 10x. Not 100x. Two thousand three hundred and forty-seven to one. For the same thing. In the same building. On the same Tuesday. The price is correct. Every drug in the chargemaster has twelve prices. Twelve. Gross charge. Medicare rate. Medicaid rate. Blue Cross. Aetna. Cigna. UnitedHealth. Humana. Workers' comp. Tricare. Auto insurance. And the self-pay rate. The self-pay rate is for the person without insurance. It is the gross charge. The fictional number. The anchor. The person without insurance pays the number that was designed to be negotiated down from. They pay the ceiling because they have no one to negotiate on their behalf. Same drug. Same chair. Same nurse. They pay the price that no insurer in the country would accept. I maintain a file. CDM line item 637-4892-PKB. Saline flush. Sodium chloride 0.9%. Acquisition cost: $0.47. We charge $87. That is an 18,410% markup. The saline flush is used before and after every IV infusion. A chemo patient receiving twelve cycles will be charged $87 for saline fourteen times per visit. I know the math. My team built the math. The math is the job. The price is correct. In 2021, the federal government required hospitals to publish their prices. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule. Machine-readable file. Gross charges. Discounted cash prices. Payer-specific negotiated rates. We complied. We posted the file. The file is a 9,400-row CSV on our website under "Patient Financial Resources." Four clicks from the homepage. Column F: "CDM_GROSS_CHG." Column J: "DERV_PAYERID_NEGRATE." My team designed the column headers. They designed them to comply. They did not design them to communicate. CMS reported 93% of hospitals now post a file. Compliance. But only 62% of the posted data is usable. That gap is where we operate. We are compliant. The data is published. The data is incomprehensible. A researcher downloaded our file. She spent three weeks cleaning it. She called the billing department for clarification on 340 line items. They transferred her four times. The fourth transfer was to a voicemail box that was full. She published her analysis anyway. Cardiac catheterization lab charges: $8,200 to $71,000 for the same procedure depending on the payer. The report received eleven views on our press monitoring dashboard. I saw it. I did not forward it. On April 1, a new CMS rule takes effect. Hospital CEOs must personally attest — by name, encoded in the machine-readable file — that the pricing data is "true, accurate, and complete." My name. Sam Hazen. In the file. Attesting that 42,000 fictional anchors are true, accurate, and complete. They are complete. I will give them that. Forty-two thousand line items is nothing if not complete. A new analyst read the transparency data. She asked why the same MRI costs $450 for Medicare and $4,200 for Aetna in the same building on the same machine. I told her the rates reflect negotiated contractual agreements between the payer and the facility. She said that doesn't explain the difference. I told her the difference IS the contractual agreement. She said that sounds like the price is arbitrary. I told her the price is the result of a rigorous, multi-variable analysis that accounts for acuity, case mix, regional market dynamics, and payer contract terms. She asked if I could show her the analysis. I told her the analysis is proprietary. The analysis does not exist. The analysis is my team, in Q4, adjusting the chargemaster upward by the percentage the CFO wrote on a sticky note. The sticky note this year said "6-8%." They chose 7.4% because it is between six and eight and it has a decimal, which makes it look calculated. She stopped asking. The price is correct. My insurance. The executive health plan. Not in the chargemaster. Administered separately. I do not pay the gross charge. I do not pay the negotiated rate. I pay a $20 copay for services at our own facilities. Gross charge for my treatment: $14,200. Insured rate for our largest commercial payer: $8,600. I pay $20. The executive health plan was designed by the Chief Human Resources Officer and approved by the compensation committee. I was not on the compensation committee. I was a beneficiary of it. That is a different thing. I benefit from the system I price. I price the system I benefit from. These are two separate facts that happen to involve the same person. HCA Healthcare was named the Most Admired Company in our industry by Fortune magazine for the twelfth consecutive year. That was February. The same month I sold $21.5 million in company stock and purchased zero shares. Fortune did not ask about the chargemaster. I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. I have 42,000 prices in a spreadsheet across 182 hospitals. None of them are real. All of them are charged. Same drug: $12,000 or $43,000. Depends on which spreadsheet. Which building. Which contract. Which page of which PDF. The patient who has no contract pays the most. The researcher who found the discrepancy got a voicemail box that was full. The analyst who asked why stopped asking. The executive who prices the system pays $20. On April 1, I will personally attest that this is true, accurate, and complete. The price is correct. The price has always been correct. I am the price.

If a leaked draft acknowledging the existence of vaccine injuries & recommending an ICD10 code is cause for turmoil, perhaps is it time to conclude that this administration can't be supported. Because for a good part of Trump's voters, this strict minimum is why he was elected.

We still have 2 days until the ACIP meeting, yet the story around it already looks like a spy movie scenario. Why?

Apoorva Mandavilli was Jay Varma’s contact at the NYT to push his Monkey Pox fear porn. https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/nyc-law-firm-probes-pharma-company-over-potential-security-violations-wolf-haldenstein-adler-freeman-herz-jay-varma-siga-tpoxx-monkeypox-drug-mpox

Hey @grok who is @apoorva_nyc ?? Give me lifetime biography in which country she came from and why she is stealing other people’s work and not crediting them? I want to make this Witch a household name as this is not her first time.

Why are so many queing for antibiotics? A chunk of them will have had the Meningitis jabs? Also a strange coincidence that schools are currently rolling out MACWY jabs to year 9s at the moment. @Jikkyleaks @ClareCraigPath https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ce8n9vd5r09t

LOLOLOLOLOLOL @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse The same person who doesn't even know about the URF from v-safe to VAERS, but decided to write the @APPCPenn whitepaper ANYWAY Apparently "fully supports" the "needed research" 😂😂😂😂😂 https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/p/a-gaping-hole-in-the-appc-whitepaper

@apoorva_nyc will forever be known for this garbage tweet.

Amazing. The @nytimes has billions of dollars at its disposal but appears that it has resorting to stealing work from one of the very few journalists in the world actually bringing you independent medical news first. @apoorva_nyc you should fix this.

Interesting link between pandemic planners since 2015, Rothschilds, shell companies in tax havens, and link with the Netherlands/Erasmus University alumnus chartered accountant Dick van Duijn formerly of The Capital Holdings, linked to LCH Investment NV: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2033385365281570988