you got Coward Senators who block their own vax injured constituents
isnt this illegal ? i advised Chelle to file a suit on him
@reprandyfinee — i see you dont value the free speech of the vaxinjured as evidenced below by @Michell87463246 post
Everyone please share this and Let people know that Florida senator Randy Fine does not value or support those of us who are injured by the vax
SENATOR RANDY FINE - you are a coward and we SEEE YOU
Who elected Qatar to run the US @realDonaldTrump?
Asking for 150 million registered voters.
This is a disguised IQ test.
If you have any pretense to understand data and are sharing this guy's jokes, I'll be unfollowing you discretely - given that you'll have proven to be a complete clown.
https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/2034130596671213616
Sometimes you just need a meme.
#ACIPgate #Afroman
✅The @nytimes corrects the record
After a turbulent week, the record has been corrected. And for the vaccine-injured, it may mark a turning point.
Thank you @SherylNYT
LINK 👇
Worth remembering that the only people to investigate the death of the three Apollo 1 astronauts under suspicious circumstances, where NASA were likely responsible for their deaths...
Were NASA.
They said it was an accident.
Move along. Nothing to see.
R to @Jikkyleaks: Update... Not a replacement but an example of how one data provider can massage data.
https://x.com/i/status/2034407603099623666
This is insane.
The frontrunner in the Paris mayoral race appeared to smile when questioned about a major extracurricular abuse scandal. This raises serious questions.
The Inventor: Out For Blood In Silicon Valley
https://watchdocumentaries.com/the-inventor-out-for-blood-in-silicon-valley/
@EMWResearch @missyTHX1138 @Jikkyleaks 😮 link below
🚨AAP went to court to stop vaccine reforms and won. For now.
They keep the bloated CDC schedule. They keep COVID shots for infants, children, and pregnant women. They keep Hep B at birth. They keep the liability shield that comes with all of it. They keep control of safety review through conflicted ACIP insiders.
And they keep the COVID vaccine injured out of public view, shutting down their chance to be heard at the ACIP meeting scheduled for March 18–19.
This is what captured systems do: protect themselves first, ask questions never. They just keep repeating the falsehood that the science is settled.
🚨Now a RICO lawsuit alleges something very different-- that the system claiming safety never properly tested it, blocked the studies that could, and punished the doctors who spoke out.
This isn’t oversight. It’s control. And we the American people will not stand for it.
#MedicalFreedom #Accountability #VaccinePolicy #VSRF
@ChildrensHD
@AmerAcadPeds
https://vsrf.substack.com/p/striking-back-at-the-aap-a-rico-lawsuit
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@canceledmouse
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/gatekeepers-tuesday-march-17-2026
There are no methods sections to this TGA report. No explanation for how they convert CT scores into nanograms.
When they are FOIAd for more information it all comes back redacted.
However we did learn they used a single assay in the Kan region which will provide 100 fold lower estimates.
And with that they also knew about the activation of cGAS-STING cancer pathway. Otherwise they could not have not used radioactive markers to determine where the LNPs would end up.
@SAHPRA1 (@HealthZA) Regulatory authority in South Africa, still deny DNA contamination in Comirnaty, Central National Health Laboratory Service Bloemfontein & SAHPRA denied our PAIA/FOIA request. No product specification to test against, per Pfizer contract.
Case # 2023-027571.
Upon further research, I can confirm that Our World in Data (OWID) hasNOT changed the source for this chart overnight. What actually happens is that OWID presents two different approaches to measuring cancer death rates: one based on reported data from the WHO, and another based on estimates from IHME's Global Burden of Disease study.
The misleading part is that OWID uses the same title ("Death rate from cancer") for both charts, and the IHME IHME/GBD version can be harder to find or access online.
It is widely recognized in public health that not all cancer deaths are properly registered on death certificates in many countries, which leads to underreporting in official mortality statistics. As a result, reported cancer mortality rates tend to be lower in official records than they are in reality.
This explains why cancer mortality rates from WHO sources are generally lowerthan those estimated by IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) in the Global Burden of Disease study.
IHME/GBD doesn't just "collect" raw data; it intensively adjusts for under-registration, redistributes garbage codes, and models to estimate real cancer mortality, especially addressing under-registration and mis-coding.
Key estimation process for cancer deaths by IHME/GBD:
1. Massive collection of raw data from all available sources (tens of thousands of sources overall for GBD).
2. Correction and standardization: Adjustments for under-registration in vital systems; Redistribution of "garbage codes"(vague or incorrect codes on certificates, e.g., "multi-organ failure," "natural causes," "unspecified heart disease"). GBD uses evidence-based algorithms to reassign these to likely underlying causes, including cancer. This step is crucial for cancer, as many cases are not properly diagnosed or coded.
3. Ensemble modeling (combined models): Advanced statistical models (Cause of Death Ensemble model – CODEm) estimate cause-specific death rates for most causes; Mortality is estimated directly, but also informed by mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIR) for consistency with incidence data; Adjustments for age, sex, location, year, and age-standardization (using a global standard population) for fair comparisons; Incorporation of covariates (e.g., healthcare access, prevalence of risks like tobacco) to improve estimates in data-scarce countries.
4. Internal consistency: The entire time series (1990–2023) is re-estimated in each cycle to ensure comparability, even with new data inputs.
5. Uncertainty: Uncertainty intervals (UI) are calculated because data scarcity in some countries increases variability.
Here are the links to both OWID charts for cancer:
Death rate from cancer, 2000 to 2023 - SOURCE: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Global Burden of Disease, 2025.
Estimated number of age-standardized deaths from total cancers, per 100,000 people.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cancer-death-rates?tab=line&time=2000..latest&country=ESP~GBR~NZL~JPN~FRA
Death rate from cancer, 2000 to 2023 - SOURCE: WHO (World Health Organization, 2025)
Reported annual death rate from total cancers, age-standardized per 100,000 people, based on the underlying cause listed on death certificates.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cancer-death-rate-who-mdb?time=2000..latest&country=ESP~GBR~NZL~JPN~FRA
Hey Dr Eric Topol (@EricTopol)
quick question, Sir
I see your name is mentioned in the exchange below with Kristian Anderson, Eddie Holmes & Andrew Rambaut regarding the fraudulent Proximal Origins Paper coverup
Andrew Rambaut: “And you got your mate ERIC TOPOL to tweet it”
Now… I got some questions for you
1- WHY was your name mentioned and how close of a mate are you with Kristian Anderson
2- Did you know that paper was fraudulent when you tweeted it?
3- were you paid by them or big pharma to tweet it?
4- Are you and Kristian Anderson still good mates?
5- what are your thoughts on Vaccine injuries?
the public & I cant wait to see your responses
are you on the right side of history, doc or are you one of these celebrity pharma paid pushing puppets?
~ Nurse Lyndsey
CC: @SecKennedy @Jikkyleaks @canceledmouse @Fynnderella1 @Rebecca21951651
This is what happens when you don't impeach corrupt judges.
Reform is blocked. Corruption is protected.
Bukele and Musk are right.
@DoctorCole @chrismartenson @RWMaloneMD @PierreKory @Jikkyleaks @SecKennedy @joerogan
BTW people like Elisabeth Bik do have any incentive for posting frivolous post publication concerns
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@canceledmouse
I am not sure why the scientific community is so blind to this problem
https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/i/186392060/an-incentive-for-frivolous-post-publication-peer-review
When you understand that the intelligence agencies are recruiting people who are prepared to break laws to get what they want, you will understand the depths of humanity that the intelligence agencies recruited.
And that includes the people they sent to silence us.
Regulatory agencies in Germany and Australia have confirmed the presence of DNA in mRNA vaccines. The FDA has failed to provide any data on this.
The 2025 summary report from TGA Laboratories confirmed that 28 batches of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contained DNA.
Where is the data from the FDA describing the measurement and quantification of Spike DNA in vaccine products?
Where is the data from the FDA showing the fate of residual DNA byproducts in mRNA vaccine products?
Where are the FDA studies evaluating DNA persistence or integration potential?
Why hasn't the FDA provided mRNA vaccine -specific safety DNA thresholds for LNP-encapsulated DNA?
Six years after deployment, there is little to no data on the biological fate of DNA fragments delivered inside lipid nanoparticles, including whether they persist in tissues or how they interact with host cells.
References:
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI). Testing mRNA vaccines for DNA contamination (2025).
Summary report of residual DNA and endotoxin on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines conducted
by TGA Laboratories (2025)
The one on the left is that IHME
where
IHME Board = Halton 🇦🇺
IHME Independent Advisory Cttee = Sutton🇦🇺
https://x.com/FeeRedfern/status/1925808073790062686?s=20
https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/transcribed-twit-thread-on-mr-big
https://healthdata.org/about/governance
https://healthdata.org/about/governance-iac
So the polio vax gave people polio. Who’d a thunk?
What @ScienceMagazine is trying to say is that the polio vaccine virus strains cause polio, so they tried to stop giving one of the strains and found it was too late.
The vaccine virus is now epidemic because they overused it.
Nice work, science.
https://archive.md/GjeXv
WHOA!
Clear-as-day, in-your-face example of how whoever controls the data controls what you are told.
This is what is happening to the "real world data" publications that you are being fed.
@jsm2334 @MaryanneDemasi @jeffreytucker @Fynnderella1 @DrJulieSladden @RMConservative
The eyes that need to see it do
⚕️⚖️🔜
This same situation for the first ACIP cancellation, now the " leak "
But nothing published on time in the Federal Register *Twice*.
I think people who do government service especially anything going against a certain narrative should have more protection and attention given to the issues they raise on being targeted and attacked. I don’t know why RFK jr or Jay B or even the White House couldn’t weigh in publicly in a general way. What’s happening is despicable criminal harassment with career ending consequences. I’m fighting now because I have no choice but I do have much on my plate and don’t want to waste my remaining time on earth answering to never ending investigations. Persecution causes suffering and quenched creativity that is badly needed for innovation within academia.
Someone in the administration is trading before official government data releases. You can see it in the options markets.
*** this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb:
"members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA"***
Mystery solved : the NYT article was edited roughly 24 hours after original publication & the report added.
https://x.com/canceledmouse/status/2033952611179667594
This is extremely problematic that @CR_AACR @AACR @AACR_CEO just did this for manuscripts published two decades ago. They have succumbed to the wishes of PubPeer to destroy careers and silence science that questions pharma products. The AACR is highly supported by big pharmaceutical companies and may have possible sold out. As a 30+ year loyal member of AACR with many hundreds of presentations over the years including the most in the world in some recent years, I am deeply saddened by what has happened with the pollution of PubMed records with "concerns" on old publications in @CR_AACR. Perhaps AACR's conflicts should be investigated given the aggressive handling of anonymous concerns with hiding behind policies and guidelines and not listening to the seriousness of what PubPeer has been doing to the field. I had previously offered to advise AACR on very important issues related to research integrity, PubPeer, public trust but this was ignored. Damaging reputations of innocent individuals requires the attention of our professional societies as US science continues to be damaged. I have called on @HHSGov and @NIH to weigh in on the weaponization of post peer-review platforms such as PubPeer and the consequences that include never ending professional harassment through never-ending investigations, contacting employers and journals. This has been leading for many innocent individuals to reputational damage that threatens personal and professional livelihood, grant funding and the ability to make meaningful contributions to the field. @HHSGov @DrTonyLetai @KimrynRathmell @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @CR_AACR @SenRonJohnson @Kevin_McKernan @kaelin_lab @LocasaleLab @P_McCulloughMD @RandPaul @SenBillCassidy @TheCancerLetter @JanciToxDoc @KUPERWASSERLAB @SabinehazanMD @Melchizedek1972 @danaparish @xazalbert @MaryanneDemasi @ryanjamesjessup @Oncotarget @MAHA_Institute @efenigson @DrPatrick @jeffreytucker @Jikkyleaks
CHEESINT strikes again.
(Like OSINT but funkier.)
🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED
While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them
Prof. John Ioannidis (@Stanford) in his own words:
“Death threats were very commonplace.”
“Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…”
“The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.”
“If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.”
“The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.”
🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize.
⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend.
While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s @ScienceMagazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics).
Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility.
📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best:
“There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.”
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health.
@realDonaldTrump @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay @DrJBhattacharya @elonmusk @NIH @HHS_ORI @aaas
I posted this comment in response to an article by @ClareCraigPath
There was an immediate comment from Jessica Hockett (PANDA linked to Nick Hudson) to suggest Clare delete my comment. JH's comment has since been deleted but I have a copy in my emails.
I wonder why she would have done that?
What was it about the post she really didn't like?
Maybe the links between Blackrock, funding generally and the Pandemic Collective. (@MindandEmotion7 links to Epstein?)
It's not like I mention the pandemic insurance scam that the actuaries supported. Where they hype the risks and then charge higher insurance then when not so many people died they didn't have to pay out type thing. @Jikkyleaks
Nope, I never mentioned that in this case. In fact there is nothing even two years on that seems incorrect.
Original post from June 2024.
"There is a huge effort going on to detract from the likely fact that the initial covid spread was deliberate and specifically targetted at certain populations.
Some non biological factors supporting this view.....
There were two important documents issued in 2019 that indicate it was a well planned attack.
1. Blackrock issued a report mid 2019 in which they said a crisis was coming and their recommendations were for the FED to issue money to non banking institutions (rather than to the banks as happened in 2008). Lockdown was partly to stop all the injected money being spent and inflation going sky high. Instead it was directed to certain businesses like Amazon for example.
2. Event 201 in Wuhan Oct 2019 in which delegates were issued with specific instrutions as to what to do in the event of a pandemic of what sounded almost identical to Covid. This was where the use of ventilators was stated.
@JesseMatchey commented on Twitter
"I think if we start asking why West Exec Avril Haines was on Event 201 with CDC, George Gao, we may get somewhere. She also advised Open Philanthropy, which was part of the “Pandemic Collective”, a group of NGOs that had monthly calls about global pandemics, for the past decade. The same George Gao that was part of Global Virome Project, based at the One Health Institute UC Davis DEFUSE was their solution (problem, reaction, solution), to being able to get the world to submit to this Carte blanche mRNA, Crispr, OneHealth was the objective…SARS2 was the buy-in."
Angela Merkel visited the German Lab in Wuhan in 2019.
People returning from the World Military Games held in Wuhan in Sept 2019 reported feeling ill with a unusual virus. They would have spread it to several countries.
That's just some of it there is far more.
The dangers of covid may not yet be fully apparent. The best bioweapons are slow to act. I would dearly have loved to say it is all behind us, but that is far from the case.
Prion diseases (5-10 yrs on ) cannot be ruled out.
We cannot rule out that covid itself may have increased cancer rates. Shedding is a huge concern (see link below).
This presentation given on 1st June 2024 to the Canadian inquiry is sobering in the extreme. Shedding does appear to be happening and therefore we are all at risk in different ways. Blood and tissue banks are not being protected.
https://x.com/hervk102/status/1797982431498117246
We have to stop giving any more mRNA shots.
We must have easy access to cheap Vit D Zn Ivermectin and other treatment options. For as long as injections are being given covid will circulate and excess deaths will continue. We have to break the cycle.
Playing down the harms is not helping us find the real perpetrators nor solutions to what is happening now and is to come. We have to recognise the full effect of the possible harms, stop the possibility of iatrogenic harms in future and stop another deliberate release/ scam. It has to be all three not just one of them. The alternative is bleak.""
One Health has still not gone away and there is still a lot of money in pandemic planning and insurance. We have elevated cancer levels and lack of data to show harm.
We still have a way to go to stop this madness happening again in same or modified form.
This was just one of the notable points Clare raised in the article.
One which hardly ever gets mentioned:
"There are actually four laboratories in Wuhan. The other three were a Chinese CDC lab, which worked on bat coronaviruses and had a lower safety authorisation than WIV, a military lab and a German-Chinese viral laboratory in Union hospital.
The fact these never get mentioned is a story in itself. The Union hospital laboratory was the base for a German-Chinese virology collaboration, which included the WIV and Tongji Medical College and had already received over a decade of government funding.
The research aimed to create vaccines and treatments for chronic viruses including HIV.
The lead German virologist was Ulf Dittmer who has links to Christian Drosten. Christian Drosten had apparently started work on a PCR test in 2019 a week before the Chinese had said the pneumonia had been caused by a coronavirus and published inaccurately on asymptomatic spread in January 2020. He worked in collaboration with scientists at WIV and his hospital has close contacts with Tongji hospital.
Ultimately, I cannot tell you who made it based on this evidence, only that it was man made."
[Bold added by myself]
I just started supporting you. I hope more people will. You are an excellent journalist and I hope you keep on reporting about subjects the MSM rarely touches. Thank you for your courage!
Don't worry about the pharmaceuticals...
Most of your seed oils are made using similar processes dissolved in industrial hexane.
When you start seeing seed oil supplies interrupted, never buy then again.
"The data collected by authorities from IVF clinics is far too generalized, and detecting safety signals in these datasets may be impossible or delayed by years."
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@canceledmouse
The vaxx pushers may feign outrage when I point out that they have