Impf_Info – Following Feed 610 Posts (gefiltert)

🚨Breaking #ACIPgate: someone didn't cover their tracks. There was one official leak. It went to @MaryanneDemasi to publish (hence the use of the word "exclusive" - which means the story was given to her and only her) because she is the only trusted journalist with the credentials and experience to handle the leak properly within US law. But this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb: "members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA" Is this why the meeting was shut down - because they were going to blow #plasmidgate open? And if so, who leaked that to the New York Times in order to derail the meeting and create a false story about Demasi's reporting? There is NO mention of plasmid contamination in the Demasi report. If this was a confidential part of the meeting agenda it should not have been leaked to the Times and as it doesn't appear in Demasi's article or the leaked document that means that someone else was leaking to the times. Who? @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @jeffreytucker @AGHuff @Fynnderella1 @docbiss Full NYT article here: https://archive.md/18YDV

https://x.com/i/status/2033649028806939140 🚨 Dernières nouvelles : L'histoire du chien « guéri grâce à un vaccin à ARNm » est devenue virale, mais il s'agissait d'un canular. Le chien n'était pas guéri et ce que l'histoire omettait de mentionner, c'est qu'il avait en réalité été traité avec le nouvel inhibiteur PD-L1 de Merck, récemment mis sur le marché pour les tumeurs mastocytaires. Je me fiche complètement de savoir quelle IA était ouverte sur leur ordinateur à un moment donné au cours de ce processus. Toute cette histoire a été fabriquée de toutes pièces pour faire la promotion du gilvetmab tout en vous conditionnant à accepter l'ARNm comme traitement contre le cancer, alors que c'est souvent le contraire. Pour mémoire, l'UNSW reçoit chaque année des millions de dollars de financement de la part de l'industrie pharmaceutique. Voir le tweet suivant pour l'aveu concernant l'utilisation de l'inhibiteur de point de contrôle. https://animalcancercareclinic.com/immunotherapy-offers-new-hope-for-dogs/

1/2 My comment👇 Public Comment Submission to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) https://www.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2026-0199-2405 My name is Hanna Parikka. I’m writing to you as a former academic reproductive health professional with 20 years’ experience as an IVF biologist (equivalent to embryologist) in Finland. Since the gene-based Covid vaccines rollout, I have had extreme concerns about the lack of safety data, pharmacovigilance, transparency, precautionary principle, accountability, informed consent, professional ethics & competence as well as free speech in scientific and ethical issues in our society and amongst us professionals. We were told by the authorities that the safety signals have been closely monitored and nothing of concern has been found. I would like to ask: who is monitoring, where are the written guidelines and who is responsible for the collected data? I know as a professional that concerning the Covid vaccines, there were no instructions or requirements for traceability from the authorities. The IVF field could have been the perfect early-warning system - why wasn't it implemented? This is not a question of IVF, but possible safety signals which could be seen especially in the IVF laboratory, and which possibly could explain the decline in global fertility & birth rates. IVF field could have been able to detect some biological disturbances long before they become visible as reduced fertility outcomes. Known risks associated with gene-based Covid vaccines (e.g. lipid nanoparticles, spike protein, modified mRNA, residual DNA, SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences) may also affect fertility at a very early stage, which can lead to problems with cell or early embryo quality, implantation issues, or very early miscarriage. Also, we cannot think in a way that we aren’t seeing any safety signal if the child is born alive. IVF outcome tracking should have been mandatory from 2021 onward. Failing to do so was not only a complete scientific failure, but especially a moral failure born of haste, political pressure and institutional capture. Since the introduction of Covid vaccines some professionals (me included) in the IVF field have shared their concerning observations in the IVF clinics, e.g. less mature oocytes (MII), degenerating oocytes and embryos, lower blastocyst formation, impaired quality of eggs, sperm and embryos, unusual findings in PGT (pre-implantation genetic testing), implantation failures, increased miscarriages and impaired sperm quality. The fundamental problem is that there are no requirements or guidelines provided by the authorities for the monitoring of safety signals, and the information of patients’ vaccination status is not provided – this makes it very difficult to find any safety signals linked to the gene-based Covid vaccines in the IVF lab. Thus, you won’t probably find anything. (Continues...👇)

Childhood and adult deaths suspected and registered. My presentation from 2024. Also pointed out by Dr Julie Sladden Jessica Rose and others - They undertook antigen tests in car parks!

Ha ha... more confirmation that the vaxx pushers are so st00pid they don't even know what they don't know! 😂😂😂😂😂 @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/i/156151246/the-wider-scientific-community-is-not-doing-its-job-either

Clinical trial fraud costs lives. By anchoring raw trial data to the #BSV ledger in real-time, researchers create an immutable audit trail. No more adjusting results after the fact. Transparency = Trust. #MedicalResearch #Blockchain

A rogue Fed judge ordered the ACIP meeting canceled. Many are in DC on their own dime for the meeting, away from patient care, and now it’s canceled. Pathetic.

1/ Let this be a reminder that the last time a judge made a ruling in favor of a vaccine, the exact same day Merck announced they were building a new factory in the area. 😒😒😒 https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/merck-manufacturing-north-carolina-vaccines/742146/

R to @Jikkyleaks: 50% response rate, just like Rosie. "Safe and effective". "If it works for your dog.. maybe it can work for you". This is how pharma sells drugs. https://www.drugs.com/vet/gilvetmab.html

R to @Jikkyleaks: Gilvetmab is licensed for the treatment of canine mast cell tumours. https://x.com/i/status/2032962863191699837

🚨 Breaking: The story about the dog "cured with an mRNA vaccine" went viral but was fake. The dog wasn't cured and the bit missing from the story was that it was actually treated with Merck's new PD-L1 inhibitor, newly introduced for mast cell tumours. I don't even care about which AI was open on their computer at some point during this process. The whole story was manufactured to advertise gilvetmab at the same time as to condition you to accept mRNA as a cancer therapy when it is often the opposite. For the record, UNSW takes millions of dollars in pharma funding every year. See next tweet for the admission about using the checkpoint inhibitor. https://animalcancercareclinic.com/immunotherapy-offers-new-hope-for-dogs/

This will get overturned. It is well enshrined in FACA law that the sitting Secretary can appoint and fire members on their own authority and based on the charter of the committee. It is also wildly political to do this two days before hearing. What a joke https://apple.news/ApdfOJLXMRa6jX6NyylqHdQ

This is the docket text: Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary relief is GRANTED in part. (i)    The Court STAYS the January 2026 Memo revising the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 705. (ii) The Court STAYS the appointments of the thirteen ACIP members appointed on June 11, 2025, September 11, 2025, and January 13, 2026. (iii) The Court further STAYS all votes taken by the now-stayed ACIP. (MBM) CM/ECF - USDC Massachusetts - Version  1.8.5 as of 12/19/2025

I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. The largest for-profit hospital system in the United States. One hundred and eighty-two hospitals. Twenty states. I oversee a spreadsheet called the chargemaster. It has 42,000 line items. Each line item is a price. The prices are not real. I need to be precise about that. They are not estimates. Not approximations. Not market rates. They are anchors. An anchor is a number you set high so that every negotiated discount feels like a victory. No relationship to cost. No relationship to value. A relationship to leverage. My team sets the anchors. That is the job. The price is correct. Take a drug. Keytruda. Immunotherapy. Treats sixteen types of cancer. The manufacturer charges approximately $11,000 per dose. That is the acquisition cost. What the hospital pays. My team enters it into the chargemaster. They do not enter $11,000. They enter $43,000. That is the gross charge. The gross charge is a fiction. No one pays it. No one is expected to pay it. The gross charge exists so that when Blue Cross negotiates a 68% discount, they pay $13,760, and the contract says "68% discount" and both parties feel the transaction was rigorous. A 68% discount on a fictional price produces a real price that is 25% above acquisition cost. That margin is where I live. My 2025 compensation was $26.5 million. Eighty percent of my bonus is tied to EBITDA. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is also earnings before the patient opens the bill. Same dose of Keytruda at the hospital across town. Gross charge: $12,000. Blue Cross rate: $10,200. Same drug. Same dose. Same needle. Same cancer. Different spreadsheet. The CMS transparency data showed the ratio between the highest and lowest negotiated price for the same drug at the same hospital can reach 2,347 to one. Not 2x. Not 10x. Not 100x. Two thousand three hundred and forty-seven to one. For the same thing. In the same building. On the same Tuesday. The price is correct. Every drug in the chargemaster has twelve prices. Twelve. Gross charge. Medicare rate. Medicaid rate. Blue Cross. Aetna. Cigna. UnitedHealth. Humana. Workers' comp. Tricare. Auto insurance. And the self-pay rate. The self-pay rate is for the person without insurance. It is the gross charge. The fictional number. The anchor. The person without insurance pays the number that was designed to be negotiated down from. They pay the ceiling because they have no one to negotiate on their behalf. Same drug. Same chair. Same nurse. They pay the price that no insurer in the country would accept. I maintain a file. CDM line item 637-4892-PKB. Saline flush. Sodium chloride 0.9%. Acquisition cost: $0.47. We charge $87. That is an 18,410% markup. The saline flush is used before and after every IV infusion. A chemo patient receiving twelve cycles will be charged $87 for saline fourteen times per visit. I know the math. My team built the math. The math is the job. The price is correct. In 2021, the federal government required hospitals to publish their prices. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule. Machine-readable file. Gross charges. Discounted cash prices. Payer-specific negotiated rates. We complied. We posted the file. The file is a 9,400-row CSV on our website under "Patient Financial Resources." Four clicks from the homepage. Column F: "CDM_GROSS_CHG." Column J: "DERV_PAYERID_NEGRATE." My team designed the column headers. They designed them to comply. They did not design them to communicate. CMS reported 93% of hospitals now post a file. Compliance. But only 62% of the posted data is usable. That gap is where we operate. We are compliant. The data is published. The data is incomprehensible. A researcher downloaded our file. She spent three weeks cleaning it. She called the billing department for clarification on 340 line items. They transferred her four times. The fourth transfer was to a voicemail box that was full. She published her analysis anyway. Cardiac catheterization lab charges: $8,200 to $71,000 for the same procedure depending on the payer. The report received eleven views on our press monitoring dashboard. I saw it. I did not forward it. On April 1, a new CMS rule takes effect. Hospital CEOs must personally attest — by name, encoded in the machine-readable file — that the pricing data is "true, accurate, and complete." My name. Sam Hazen. In the file. Attesting that 42,000 fictional anchors are true, accurate, and complete. They are complete. I will give them that. Forty-two thousand line items is nothing if not complete. A new analyst read the transparency data. She asked why the same MRI costs $450 for Medicare and $4,200 for Aetna in the same building on the same machine. I told her the rates reflect negotiated contractual agreements between the payer and the facility. She said that doesn't explain the difference. I told her the difference IS the contractual agreement. She said that sounds like the price is arbitrary. I told her the price is the result of a rigorous, multi-variable analysis that accounts for acuity, case mix, regional market dynamics, and payer contract terms. She asked if I could show her the analysis. I told her the analysis is proprietary. The analysis does not exist. The analysis is my team, in Q4, adjusting the chargemaster upward by the percentage the CFO wrote on a sticky note. The sticky note this year said "6-8%." They chose 7.4% because it is between six and eight and it has a decimal, which makes it look calculated. She stopped asking. The price is correct. My insurance. The executive health plan. Not in the chargemaster. Administered separately. I do not pay the gross charge. I do not pay the negotiated rate. I pay a $20 copay for services at our own facilities. Gross charge for my treatment: $14,200. Insured rate for our largest commercial payer: $8,600. I pay $20. The executive health plan was designed by the Chief Human Resources Officer and approved by the compensation committee. I was not on the compensation committee. I was a beneficiary of it. That is a different thing. I benefit from the system I price. I price the system I benefit from. These are two separate facts that happen to involve the same person. HCA Healthcare was named the Most Admired Company in our industry by Fortune magazine for the twelfth consecutive year. That was February. The same month I sold $21.5 million in company stock and purchased zero shares. Fortune did not ask about the chargemaster. I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. I have 42,000 prices in a spreadsheet across 182 hospitals. None of them are real. All of them are charged. Same drug: $12,000 or $43,000. Depends on which spreadsheet. Which building. Which contract. Which page of which PDF. The patient who has no contract pays the most. The researcher who found the discrepancy got a voicemail box that was full. The analyst who asked why stopped asking. The executive who prices the system pays $20. On April 1, I will personally attest that this is true, accurate, and complete. The price is correct. The price has always been correct. I am the price.

If a leaked draft acknowledging the existence of vaccine injuries & recommending an ICD10 code is cause for turmoil, perhaps is it time to conclude that this administration can't be supported. Because for a good part of Trump's voters, this strict minimum is why he was elected.

We still have 2 days until the ACIP meeting, yet the story around it already looks like a spy movie scenario. Why?

Apoorva Mandavilli was Jay Varma’s contact at the NYT to push his Monkey Pox fear porn. https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/nyc-law-firm-probes-pharma-company-over-potential-security-violations-wolf-haldenstein-adler-freeman-herz-jay-varma-siga-tpoxx-monkeypox-drug-mpox

Hey @grok who is @apoorva_nyc ?? Give me lifetime biography in which country she came from and why she is stealing other people’s work and not crediting them? I want to make this Witch a household name as this is not her first time.

Why are so many queing for antibiotics? A chunk of them will have had the Meningitis jabs? Also a strange coincidence that schools are currently rolling out MACWY jabs to year 9s at the moment. @Jikkyleaks @ClareCraigPath https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ce8n9vd5r09t

LOLOLOLOLOLOL @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse The same person who doesn't even know about the URF from v-safe to VAERS, but decided to write the @APPCPenn whitepaper ANYWAY Apparently "fully supports" the "needed research" 😂😂😂😂😂 https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/p/a-gaping-hole-in-the-appc-whitepaper

@apoorva_nyc will forever be known for this garbage tweet.

Amazing. The @nytimes has billions of dollars at its disposal but appears that it has resorting to stealing work from one of the very few journalists in the world actually bringing you independent medical news first. @apoorva_nyc you should fix this.

Interesting link between pandemic planners since 2015, Rothschilds, shell companies in tax havens, and link with the Netherlands/Erasmus University alumnus chartered accountant Dick van Duijn formerly of The Capital Holdings, linked to LCH Investment NV: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2033385365281570988

Update: @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse @OpenVAERS TwitterX hasn't been able to resolve the issue with my old handle yet - looks like I might have tried a few things on my end which made it worse 🙄 For now I will just keep using this account

Beware. A twitter Hacking scam is in progress right now. It starts with this Direct Message in your chat, from people you know and follow. Do not reply, do not engage. Their account has been hacked, and they are not sending this message. Right now, Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan @DrJKunadhasan and @SaiKate108 have been thrown out of their accounts with this mechanism. If anyone can help these 2 ladies recover their accounts please, it would be much appreciated. Our channel has received this message from 2 of our followers in this last week.

This is the full public transcript linking Project BioShield to the tabletop exercise Dark Winter. It specifically mentions the exercise, small pox vaccines, and the concerns over too many vaccinations that then gets downplayed very quickly. @Jikkyleaks https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-109shrg98930/html/CHRG-109shrg98930.htm

Do you know his name? 🤔

Be careful who you trust Internet famous Dr. Mike, has 30 million followers on his social media profiles He strongly recommends many vaccines He says “I have never been compensated by a vaccine company” He’s lying. He’s received over a million according to government data “Dr. Mike has said that he's never been compensated by a vaccine company, but publicly available records tell a different story that raises questions according to the U.S Government's CMS Open Payments database, which tracks financial relationships between doctors and pharmaceutical companies. Payments associated with Abbott Laboratories linked to Dr. Mikhail Varshavski. Total more than $1 million. Abbott is one of the largest flu vaccine manufacturers. So Dr. Mike, how do you reconcile those records with your statement that you've never taken money from a vaccine company?” And this is just what’s disclosed as direct payments….

What the fuck is this shit 🤔? How exactly do you manage to systematically disappoint, even when people aren't expecting any good from you anymore, @US_FDA ? https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-adverse-event-monitoring-system-aems/fda-adverse-event-monitoring-system-aems-public-dashboard

Most of the benefit was probably from the checkpoint inhibitors administered with the vaccine, not all the tumors responded, and the cancer is still progressing.

How about some attention to needed research and some humility about gaps in knowledge instead of widespread ad hominem attacks and hostility for even raising issues that are contrary to a heavily enforced pro-vaccine narrative. Social media brings the world together and doesn’t need paternalistic oversight in scientific discourse or exchange of public information. The public and patients deserve better.

https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/2033195620702228567 An important post for your consideration.

🚨 NEW HOLDEN THORP PUZZLE PIECE: Biases Eroding Public Trust in Science—Lockdown Flip-Flop as Prime Example! Holden Thorp's leadership at @ScienceMagazine has long been marred by overt partisanship, politicizing science in ways that deepen divides and erode public confidence. His latest column ('A tale of many twos,' Feb 2026) blames 'out of touch' scientists for lost trust, yet his own biases—consistently anti-Trump, pro-establishment narratives—have fueled this crisis. Example: Lockdowns. In 2022, Thorp decried doubts about 'masks and lockdowns' as misinformation, defending them as essential science in editorials like 'Thank you, Tony!' (praising Fauci). He slammed Trump's downplaying as 'devastating' and 'lying about science.' But now, he admits 'anger over pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable' drove anti-science sentiment—conceding public hindsight without accountability for his role in pushing these measures. ⚠️ This pattern: Thorp weaponizes Science magazine's platform for one-sided views (e.g., enabling smears against Nobel laureate Südhof, well aligned with the malicious agenda designed and executed by the perpetrators of the PubPeer 'PubSmear' Network Mob, such as Leonid Schneider, a self-implicated harasser and academic falsifier, and Elisabeth M. Bik, a fake 'science integrity consultant'), then laments the distrust he helps create. 📌 Critics agree—echoed by prominent figures: 'Science editor-in-chief Holden Thorp is a major promoter of science fraud and a major defender of science fraudsters.' — Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright), Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University. 'There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.' — Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya), Stanford professor and NIH Director nominee. 'Few people are as biased as Holden. He is so partisan it has compromised the mission of Science.' — Vinay Prasad (@VPrasadMDMPH), FDA Chief Medical and Scientific Officer. 🔗 Link to the full column in Science magazine in the comments. More evidence of compromised integrity. 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including epidemiology and vaccination, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. 📸 Image: Science Magazine’s Dark Alliance —Holden Thorp’s Compromised Journalist Derek Lowe Frequently Promoted Leonid Schneider, a key PubPeer 'PubSmear' Network Mob operator: Self-implicated in harassment, defamation, academic falsification, and mocking s-e-x-u-a-l abuse survivors. 🔗 Link to the exposé thread in the comments. 🔱 Follow @SciGuardians to be empowered and empower others. @realDonaldTrump @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay @elonmusk @NIH @HHS_ORI @aaas

FYI v-safe is also public data @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @canceledmouse I wonder why vaxx pushers adamantly refuse to study it? Probably a skill issue 😂😂😂😂😂 But it gets even worse (for the vaxx pushers) We will have NO v-safe free text https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/p/cdc-clearly-hid-v-safe-deaths-from

Operation Dark Winter was tied to Project BioShield. Also, Ian Lipkin was honored in early 2020 by China for helping manage their 2003 SARS-1 epidemic. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/china-honors-ian-lipkin

I know one of these people. And it has implications for the origin of covid-19

Did you really think that SARS-COV-2 was the first man-made pandemic virus?

The two most celebrated by msm scientists wrote a book together. @Jikkyleaks

Hyper normalisation of GMO use in humans with multitude of immune system dysbiosis, unknown duration and scope of effects and side effects. No informed consent. Disregard for bodily integrity (contaminant DNA, circular plasmids containing antimicrobials, LNP's, DNA:RNA hybrids).

Yeah that story was bloody suspicious out of the gate. We are being tenderized by the globalists to accept their next deadly, but profitable to them, offering.