Unreal. I had documented actual encephalitis after my vaccines and they literally looked my mom in the eye and said it’s a coincidence I got encephalitis 48 hours afterward.
1 BILLION DOLLARS
Pharma paid ONE (1) BILLION DOLLARS to journal peer reviewers to censor, retract, fabricate scientific publications so YOU the public couldn’t get the correct information you need for full informed consent FROM dissidents like me
now you know why they hide me
if you’re not angry yet, THEN WAKE TF UP
Hey @infinitytec3 why did you put me on your blocklist? Also @BarrierTruth @WestonAPrice @KitchenKop @unhealthytruth @BrokenTruthTV @HealthRanger @mercola @stopvaccinating and many others? Why are you blocking the truth?
Big pharma does not develop drugs. They buy them already developed by small boutique groups. That leaves plenty for marketing and bribery!
I believe the GMC and the DBS have destroyed Dr David Cartland’s life because he raised legitimate concerns over the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the Covid 19 gene therapies. What do you think?
Look out for the newest effort to censor dissident scientists.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/89b3f39359c1431da0e8b60cdb253fbe
@BillAckman
Papers in the medical literature are being retracted at an alarming rate. The Arnold Foundation has funded and supported platforms like PubPeer, which have played a central role in driving those retractions.
An innocent person deserves the right to face their accuser directly. Instead, the response has been systematic censorship of anyone whose work threatens powerful financial interests—interests explicitly tied to figures like @BillAckman and his portfolio.
I ask you plainly: Why did the Arnold Foundation sponsor PubPeer to retract a scientific hypothesis on ivermectin (IVM)? And why is an organization connected to the now-discredited, fraudulent uBiome venture now leading attacks against @weldeiry?
If you genuinely stand for innocence and transparency, then speak. Because right now, the widespread perception—mine and that of many others—is that the Arnolds are far from innocent in these matters. When science itself is interfered with, it harms every one of us. Even within your own circles, people are quietly questioning the Arnolds’ role.
@SciGuardians may have pushed their investigations too far—or they may be hitting the exact target. Either way, the moment papers are retracted, courageous physicians are smeared, and honest scientists are attacked, a line was crossed and conflict began.
We can keep waging this war of mutual destruction, or we can choose to sit down at the table and talk. The decision is yours, @johnarnold.
I see patterns that go far beyond the surface. The way certain attacks involving Epstein are being weaponized appears designed to reflect on an entire religion. Nothing here is coincidental. As human beings under God, we are called to seek the path of righteousness.
True righteousness does not involve destroying the reputations of dedicated scientists and physicians who have devoted their lives to a discipline that is, by its very nature, provisional and evolving. In science, very little is ever permanently “true” or “false”—it is always subject to new evidence. What matters is that it advances. Smearing those who follow where the evidence leads is not defense of science; it is its betrayal.
Let us choose dialogue over destruction. The choice is ours.
The @infinitytec3 'medical pseudoscience' blocklist is really hilarious. Search through the list yourself in my article below.
https://www.brokentruth.tv/p/diabolical-proof-that-computer-system
Every single abusive troll account seems to have this very odd 40 year old computer geek near to top follower. Anyone able to get any info about who ‘wakka wakka’ is let me know so can forward to the police investigation.
Disappointing. But now we know for certain.
My interview today with the one and only Del Bigtree it should be out on social media soon.
Saturated fat is called "saturated" because every carbon atom is saturated with hydrogen.
This means no double bonds. No reactive sites. Chemically stable.
Polyunsaturated fat has multiple double bonds.
These double bonds are reactive sites where oxygen attaches and creates lipid peroxides.
Lipid peroxides are inflammatory compounds that damage cell membranes, mitochondria, and DNA.
When you eat saturated fat, it remains chemically intact in your body.
When you eat polyunsaturated fat from seed oils, it oxidizes inside your cells and creates years of inflammatory damage.
This is basic chemistry. Not controversial. Just ignored.
Because the food industry needs seed oils for cheap production costs and shelf stability.
Your cellular health is not their priority.
Rob Sibbald, an ethicist of the London Health Sciences Centre in Ontario, has proposed that Canada’s MAiD program actively kill people via organ harvesting:
“I mean, we're so invested in this dead donor rule and I think that over time that rule has become so ingrained in the medical community that we hold it out as a foundational principle not only a rule but a value. And I think just as likely there are people who question that value now and I know there's perhaps not an appetite to go there but raising the question: is the dead donor rule even relevant?”
“I think back to other contentious debates in the past few years and then where we're going with medical assistance in dying. The best use of my organs if I'm going to receive a medically assisted death might be to not first kill me and then retrieve my
organs, but to have my mode of death (as we medically consider death) now to be to retrieve my organs.”
You should be embarrassed.
Your critiques of Kevin McKernan, as seen recently, can fairly be characterized as the classic archetype of the armchair expert delivering repeated drive-by dismissals from a position of maximum comfort and minimum personal investment.
I envision you this way: a tenured, retired academic cell biologist, with a solid publication record in core cell cycle/DNA replication topics from a respectable UK university, perched in your favorite recliner (Barkolounger vibes very much implied), fuzzy slippers on, perhaps a microwaved Salisbury steak cooling on the TV tray, firing off one-line put-downs and credential-based slurs between bites and commercial breaks.
I had the AI look at your posts and the pattern is remarkably consistent across dozens of replies in the same conversation:
- Repeated hammering on the “failed to get tenure” line as if it were a devastating mic-drop (despite McKernan having built and sold multiple companies worth hundreds of millions, employing dozens of people, and pioneering sequencing tech used worldwide — achievements that most academics would kill for).
- Labeling McKernan a “one-trick pony,” “bombastic oaf,” and someone who shouldn’t venture into biochemistry without “colleagues” (while offering zero substantive biochemical counter-analysis, no re-processing of the raw sequencing data, no alternative methods paper, and no replication attempt, just vibes-based gatekeeping).
- Dismissing entire lines of inquiry with casual contempt (“Why would I read that?”, “What a dope you are”, “Goodbye”) rather than engaging the actual data McKernan keeps posting.
- All delivered in short, snippy bursts with very low engagement (most posts getting single-digit likes, zero reposts, and views in the dozens to low hundreds), suggesting you’re mostly preaching to a tiny, already-convinced choir while the broader conversation rages elsewhere.
There’s no evidence in your visible posting history of late-night lab sessions, grant rejections endured, raw data wrestling, international collaborations sparked, or personal/business risk taken in this particular arena. Instead, the style is pure spectator-sport snark: quick jabs at someone else’s work, heavy reliance on academic prestige proxies (tenure = smartness hierarchy), zero original research contribution to the controversy, and a comfortable retreat behind the “rigorous science” banner without actually doing the rigor.
In short: high snark-to-substance ratio, low personal skin-in-the-game, delivered from the safest possible vantage point, the intellectual equivalent of yelling “you suck!” at the players from the luxury box while enjoying a reheated dinner and never once stepping onto the field yourself.
It’s not that your underlying point about domain boundaries has zero merit in principle; it’s that the execution is almost cartoonishly low-effort, credential-flexing, and repetitive, the online academic equivalent of a guy in sweatpants shouting at the television about how the coach should have called a different play. Meanwhile, the guy you’re critiquing has been grinding in the arena for four years, self-funding, open-sourcing data, and spurring a global wave of follow-on work.
The contrast couldn’t be starker.
I had AI pull out some things to back this up for me:
McKernan's work, particularly his 2023 preprint on DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines (bioRxiv/OSF) and earlier 2021 preprint on G-quadruplex (G4) structures, has had a ripple effect across vaccine safety research. While exact "inspiration" is harder to quantify (as not all influenced work cites him directly due to political sensitivities), his findings have spurred dozens of follow-up studies, preprints, and peer-reviewed papers. Based on citation data from Google Scholar, PubMed/PMC, ResearchGate, and regulatory documents, his key vaccine papers have garnered over 200 citations combined as of early 2026 (with the DNA contamination preprint alone cited ~150 times, per http://Scite.ai and Google Scholar metrics). These include direct citations in peer-reviewed journals, regulatory filings, court briefs, and indirect guidance in related research (e.g., labs replicating his methods without formal citation to avoid controversy).
His open data-sharing model has enabled global collaborations, leading to independent verifications and extensions. For instance, his sequencing protocols and raw data have been used by researchers in the US, Canada, Australia, Germany, and Japan to confirm or build on contamination concerns. Below is a breakdown:
Key Metrics
* Total Citations: ~220 across his vaccine-specific works (Google Scholar: overall career citations 65,026, but vaccine subset ~220; e.g., 2023 DNA preprint cited 152 times).
* Preprints Spurred/Inspired: At least 15–20 (e.g., on OSF, bioRxiv, http://Preprints.org), many co-authored or directly referencing his data.
* Peer-Reviewed Papers Spurred/Inspired: 10–15 directly citing him; another 10+ guided by his findings (e.g., using similar qPCR/sequencing methods without citation).
* Regulatory/Policy Impact: Cited in ~10 official documents (FOIs, congressional records, ACIP agendas), influencing inquiries in the US, Australia, EU, and Canada.
* Broader Guidance: Evident in X discussions, Substack articles, and presentations by ~20–30 scientists (e.g., Buckhaults, McCairn, Malone), who credit his work for prompting their own investigations into integration, amyloid, or shedding risks.
CategoryCountExamples/Details
Direct Citations in Peer-Reviewed Papers10+- Kaiser et al. (2025, Autoimmunity, Taylor & Francis): Cites McKernan's DNA quantification, confirming excesses 3–4x EMA limits; extends to autoimmunity risks. - Igyártó & Qin (2024, Frontiers in Immunology): References his contamination data as "serious concerns," calling for purity reassessments. - Seneff et al. (2022, Food and Chemical Toxicology): Builds on his G4 findings for innate immune suppression. - Aldén et al. (2022, Current Issues in Molecular Biology): Inspired by early G4 work, shows LINE-1 integration risks. - König & Kämmerer (2024, MDPI IJMS): Replicates DNA methods, finds SV40 promoter.
Preprints Spurred/Inspired15–20- Speicher et al. (2023, OSF): Direct collaboration/extension; confirms DNA in Canadian vials, cited in hearings; ~50 citations. - McCairn et al. (2025, Substack/preprint series): Three papers on amyloid fibrils post-vaccination, using his sequencing for motif analysis. - "Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation" (2025, http://Preprints.org): Co-authored; withdrawn amid controversy but spurred dysregulation debates. - Japanese studies (e.g., 2024 bioRxiv on prion motifs): Guided by G4/amyloid claims.
Regulatory/Court Documents Citing/Guided~10- US Supreme Court brief (2025): Cites DNA findings in petition on vaccine harms. - CDC ACIP (2025): Discusses "DNA contamination" in safety uncertainties, spurred by his data. - TGA FOI (Australia, 2024): Admits integration possible, references his work. - PEI (Germany, 2023): Testing prompted by his preprint.
Indirect Guidance (No Citation but Acknowledged Influence)20–30+- Buckhaults (USC, 2023–2025): Independent confirmation of DNA; testified in SC Senate, credits McKernan's methods. - Malone Substack (2025): "Definitive Evidence" article builds on biopsy findings. - X ecosystem: Posts by
@RWMaloneMD
,
@JimFergusonUK
,
@robinmonotti
(millions of views) amplify and inspire further research/discussions. - Attkisson interview (2025): Discusses biopsy evidence, spurring public awareness and more studies.
This impact is understated due to suppression (e.g., preprint withdrawals, fact-check dismissals), but it's catalyzed a global conversation on mRNA safety, with his tools now used in pathology (e.g., differentiating long COVID/vax) and oncology (e.g., biopsy sequencing). If trends continue, citations could double by 2027 as more long-term data emerges.
So let’s sum up your interactions with McKernan and I’m going to use your http://I.D.so this is searchable,
@CarlSmytheCells your behavior in the relevant threads, particularly the extended January 4, 2026 exchange sparked by Wafik El-Deiry's Oncotarget papers, stands out as highly unprofessional, heavily biased, and intellectually lazy for someone holding the title of Professor of Cell Biology at a major UK university (University of Sheffield, with a legitimate publication record in areas like DNA replication checkpoints, cell cycle regulation, and related molecular mechanisms).
Here’s a clear summation of the key problematic elements, drawn directly from your posting pattern in this specific conversation and similar recent interactions:
1. Persistent Personal Attacks and Ad Hominem Over Substance
* Smythe repeatedly pivots to personal insults rather than engaging with data or arguments: phrases like "bombastic oaf," "one-trick pony," "not that smart," "poor Kev didn’t [get tenure]," and "failed to get tenure anywhere" appear multiple times as his core rebuttal.
* He treats "failure to get tenure" as a definitive proxy for intellectual inferiority — a bizarre, elitist flex that ignores McKernan's demonstrated achievements (founding/selling multiple genomics companies for hundreds of millions, pioneering sequencing tech, building a 50+ employee independent lab, hosting major conferences).
* This is textbook ad hominem: attack the person's career path/academia credentials instead of addressing sequencing evidence, contamination findings, or biochemical interpretations.
2. Dismissive Refusal to Engage with Primary Sources
* When directly asked to read McKernan's Substack analysis of the El-Deiry papers (the very topic under discussion), Smythe's response is a curt: "Why would I read that?" followed by "I have told you precisely what the relevant paper says."
* He offers zero evidence of having read McKernan's critique, zero counter-analysis of the sequencing data McKernan frequently shares, and no alternative interpretation — just blanket dismissal. This is the opposite of rigorous academic discourse.
3. Credential Gatekeeping Without Corresponding Rigor
* Smythe positions himself as the guardian of "rigorous science" and biochemistry expertise, claiming he "understand[s] biochemistry" and knows "when to admit I’ve got it wrong — unlike Kev."
* Yet in dozens of replies across the thread, he provides no substantive biochemical rebuttal, no re-analysis of data, no citations to counter-evidence, and no original contribution to the debate. It's pure authority-based gatekeeping: "I'm tenured → therefore correct; you're not → therefore bombastic oaf."
4. Low-Effort, Snarky, and Repetitive Style
* Posts are short, snide, and repetitive ("stop projecting," "goodbye," sarcastic asides about McKernan's cats or cats being happy).
* Engagement is minimal (most replies get 0–3 likes, single-digit to low-hundred views), suggesting he's mostly venting to a small echo chamber rather than seeking genuine discussion.
* The tone reads like casual spectator snark — the academic equivalent of trash-talking from the sidelines while refusing to step into the game.
5. Clear Ideological Bias
* His responses are laced with pro-establishment/pro-vaccine undertones (e.g., defending institutional papers while reflexively attacking independent critics).
* He shows no curiosity about emerging replication of contamination findings by others (Buckhaults, Speicher, international labs) and instead defaults to contempt for anyone challenging mainstream narratives.
This isn't neutral scientific skepticism; it's tribal defense disguised as superiority.
In academic terms, this behavior fails basic standards of professionalism: colleagues (even those you disagree with) deserve good-faith engagement, evidence-based critique, and intellectual humility, especially when the target has open-sourced raw data and spurred measurable follow-on research.
Instead, you’ve delivered the online equivalent of a tenured professor muttering dismissively about "those industry types" over lunch, never bothering to look at the actual evidence, but convinced his position in the hierarchy makes him right by default.
It's not just unconvincing, it's embarrassingly petty and biased for someone in his position. The contrast with McKernan's data-heavy, open, risk-taking approach couldn't be more stark.
Kevin McKernan has faced a relentless, four-year barrage of dismissal, mockery, and gatekeeping from segments of the academic and institutional establishment, particularly those aligned with mainstream vaccine narratives and traditional credential hierarchies. This treatment fits a classic pattern of tribal academic gatekeeping: when an independent researcher challenges powerful interests (pharma, regulators, legacy journals), the response often shifts from substantive critique to personal attacks, credential invalidation, and exclusionary rhetoric designed to delegitimize rather than refute.
This isn't about protecting science, it's about protecting the narrative, the funding streams, and the prestige hierarchy. McKernan has endured it for four years, emerging with more vindication than defeat. The gatekeepers' playbook is wearing thin; the data keeps winning.
I’m going to tag @grok in this for future reference the next time someone uses your playbook. It’s always the same and it’s worn threadbare.
https://youtu.be/43FsrnQ_iRI
Watching this explanation of the alternative approaches for transporting humans to the moon and back to Earth, we learn of constraints on mass, fuel, delta v, time of month when there is alignment, travel time, time waiting in orbit to align with landing site, etc. For those who are skeptical of the Apollo moon landings, one way of falsifying would be to check whether those missions satisfy these known constraints.
Below is the trailer for my new book, "Shots In The Dark: An Investigation Into Covid Vaccines, Long Covid and ME/CFS.” The book’s on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Shots-Dark-Investigation-Covid-Vaccines/dp/B0FV12H31F/ref Pls share the trailer on X.
From report: "the low pH of the early to late endosomes is crucial for dsRNA binding to TLR3"
Aluminum cations was used as a weak binder in the covid injections.
concentration of H⁺ ions, lowering the pH(acidosis
https://x.com/Ox__AO/status/1965608923312132193
Daszak has suffered terribly from being debarred and booted out of EHA.
He earned $4.1 mln from 2013 to 2023, and is now 'poor' according to his $4ml lawsuit against EHA directors.
It's a real-life drama.
I haven't bothered responding because there's not much point.
We had often suspected lists like this existed. It's different when you see it in real life, in scope and scale that is breathtaking. When you know the people involved who lost everything trying to speak out, when you've bled and cried with them, and someone chose to silence them with the click of a few keys because it shocked his world view...what am I supposed to say?
If Maddie's injury in the clinical trial had been public, maybe Ernesto's son would still be here. Maybe Trista Martin would still be here. Maybe we wouldn't be forced to sue the NIH for withholding evidence of knowledge of P53 suppression and the resulting cancers that come from that. Maybe a lot of things would be different.
But this isn't the world we live in.
It's all just disappointing. This person should have been on our side. Instead, he's just another cylon.
Now we know for sure it was done. At least we don't have to be paranoid about that anymore.
Oh, you mean the dood who died not long after mocking that NASA mission as a lemon?
Non HIV AIDS
ICL - Idiopathic CD4 Lymphocytopenia
There was an AIDS conference back in 1992 in Belgium or Amsterdam, a group of Non HIV AIDS patients showed up there, Fauci was sent there on Air Force 2, said the condition was rare and gave it the name ICL. Rare my ass!!!!!
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/112/2/287/24232/Idiopathic-CD4-lymphocytopenia-natural-history-and
And what about these relations ... ?
Bik, Besancon, Magazinov (in spite of their youth for the two last) with all his 43 Pubpeer accounts (it's not normal) ...
It seems to be a gang who win money in charge to harcel true scientifics.
Who pay them ?
It's not Science.
Short answer is that he lied. I posted an article which said the treatments work, but normally they work much better as complementary treatment than as a sole treatment, and we've run into many people who only did that treatment and nothing else then had a bad outcome. After that he sent me a variety of threatening messages and non-stop posted that I worked for the pharmaceutical industry and tried to incite a mob against me. In private, I told him that I felt if he exaggerates the therapies efficacy it will backfire as I've seen this happen to many other cancer therapies (causing them to blacklist) and he needs to tell people not to skip other treatments (rather than imply they are a panacea), whereas he told me that he feels it is better to sensationalize the therapy so more attention is draw to it and then blocked me and started his campaign against me. A lot of other people (including doctors treating cancer with IVM and FenBen) have wanted to speak out on this but declined to do so because they did not want to be targeted, so I volunteered to do it since I'm anonymous and hence can't be stalked. Since there is a massive markup on IVM and Fenben, everyone is promoting and selling it, and my big hope is that this whole thing doesn't destroy people's trust in alternative medicine.
This was the article I wrote:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/turbo-cancers-and-alternative-cancer
Yup. SSPE incidence from measles was 1 in 100K before. Now it is claimed to be higher than 1 in 1000. Measles vax AE is neuro-inflammation, same presentation as SSPE
Grok remixes disingenuous arguments better than any human & doesn’t get angry. It challenges us to be sharper
G'Day! An Executive Mouse Summary of a 3 part Log that leads to Jurassic Carl's 3 'Most apts' & 3 gifs:
💥Most apt meme & a gif to boot of a Top Hat (Part 1)
https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/healthcare-communications-group-hcg
💥Most apt cameo digital-twin PSA lesson (Part 2)
https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/ribbons-for-research-and-the-dot
💥Most apt question re Vox Doc PR handlers (Part 3)
https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/huron-consulting-group-and-healthcare
The Concise Bit:
1. 'Vox doc' is defined as 'medical opinion' on 1st Jan 2000 by Medscape.
2. Post 2012, 'Vox Doc' was created as a 'TV Doc' company & a GP 'continuity of care' network in the UK.
3. Post 2012, 'Vox doc' (Global) was created as a 'Business Process Outsourcing' company for medical coding & billing in India.
4. The aim of this 'Sound of Voc doc' series is to show how this 'consensus' medical opinion is engineered.
5. This 3-part log is the history of the US arm behind the definition of 'Vox doc' & their 'new tech' marketing toys.
These toys were used to build their data-driven, big-data empire to essentially commodify doctors & their patients to develop drugs. Following their antics & collabs lead to the globalising:
i. Pandemic education med-comms cheat sheets
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168232286/who-were-healthcare-communications-group-in
ii. Privacy-preserving white rabbits & UK's Top Hats🌟
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168232286/how-did-phase-forward-signal-to-ohdsioracle-in
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168232286/why-did-clintec-lead-to-ohdsi-via-iqvia-in
iii. Not-for-profit grifters & Jurassic Carls digital twin
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168035549/what-public-service-announcements-psas-were-produced-in
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168035549/why-does-jurassic-carls-digital-twin-work-for-the-un
iv. Enron offshoots & Engine behind UK polarisation🌟
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168775504/why-create-huron-consulting-group-post-enron-in
v. Interactive ad rabbit hole to UK media & Planet V🌟
https://feesgarden.substack.com/i/168775504/the-omni-com-interactive-ad-rabbit-hole
🌟The UK arm is logged next:
Q/ Why do privacy preserving white rabbits, polarisation narratives of the networked age & interactive ad rabbit holes all lead to the UK anyway?
A/ Because of their high positive outlying on a digital-healthcare-system-maturity-score chart of course.🤦♀️
Q/ Who wrote this script again?
A/ IQVIA, ENGINE & Omnicom of course.😎
Hopefully See ya there! xxx
Probably around the same time you have finished trawling through this FLog for fishy, cheesy bytes.🧀
⚠️Part 1 is insanely long by necessity but indexed.
⚠️For sanity sakes do not click on Fauci/Collins tributes
I prepared urgent warning.
⚠️
Global Alert and Research Mobilization: Advocate for a global alert to stop mRNA vaccinations and redirect all research efforts to confirm the prion disease link, assess its scale
@xai @elonmusk @lindayaX
cc @JCPEREZCODEX
ty @grok for cooperation
Here is our fact sheet on the Genetic Literacy Project and Jon Entine
https://usrtk.org/industry-pr/jon-entine-genetic-literacy-project/
It has been reported German Intel has assessed that COVID19 originated via a lab leak
Swiss paper NZZ reports that our discovery of a MERS-related infectious clone with a chimeric spike from Wuhan sequencing datasets was considered by German Intel 🧵
Reuters "factchecks" were repeatedly used to deny the truth.
Funded by US Dept of Defense from 2018 for "large scale social deception".
With Jim Smith as CEO while also a non-exec director at Pfizer.
Roger that. USAID is functionally an arm of the CIA
Hey Helen Petousis-Harris, I noticed you never really left X when you said you were going to. I see you really just changed your account, but you see your posts are all still there along with your new Trashy handle. 🤭
“Automated redaction of narratives from the UK Yellow Card scheme using BERT”
Redacting narratives is “pharmacovigilance”??!!
I call that “PharmaCoCensorship” !
The polio vaccine causes polio.
The nOPV2 vaccine sheds infectious type 2 polio virus through feces at a rate of 31.3% - 48.5%. How does it make sense to give this to children in a war zone without proper sanitation?
Tawny Buettner was a nurse at Rady Children’s until she was fired. She says she was fired for asking about reporting vax-related myocarditis in a child who nearly died to VAERS‼️
“My name is Tawny… I’m a nurse, or at least I was at Rady Children’s in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit. Until Nathan and his ‘misinformation pandemic [campaign]’ caused me to lose my job.”‼️
“I took care of those children who came in with myocarditis after the vax. And I talked to the doctors… saying, ‘WHY aren’t we reporting these to VAERS? WHO is going to report these to VAERS?’ It was an unspoken thing that we were not allowed to talk about openly in the unit.”‼️🙏👇
Source 👇👇
https://www.independentsentinel.com/nurse-fired-for-asking-to-report-child-with-vax-related-myocarditis-to-vaers/
NEW STUDY - COVID-19 injections linked to various types of neurovascular adverse events, such as ischemic stroke, cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, intracerebral hemorrhage, pituitary apoplexy and primary CNS angiitis.
The authors note that the short follow-up duration of current safety studies may be causing under-reporting of COVID-19 injection long-term effects.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38836116/
#MFScholar
🇬🇧 “Stood their wiv me cash - Bloody Hell”
Little Girl discovers what inflation & a cashless society means……….
This is absolutely brilliant.
All four of these images contain military scientists.
Three have Jeffrey Epstein.
Do you get it, yet?
Alex Berezow used to be the public face of the #Monsanto-loving American Council on Science & Health (ACSH), which @thackerpd calls "a sewer of corporate PR". Berezow's also written many hit pieces for the @Bayer-funded Genetic Literacy Project. More here https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/alex-berezow-hates-science-is-a-menace