Is this yet another attempt at whitewashing the SARS-COV2 virus and justifying their zoonotic theory? Kristian G. Anderson and mates in a new 2026 paper. Could someone please take away their typewriters.
@KevinMcCairnPhD @Jikkyleaks @Kevin_McKernan
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(26)00171-6?dgcid=raven_jbs_aip_email
Dear South Carolina:
#lindabell
Careful with semantics - this is perjury.
They state fetal cells have nothing to do with MMR, so they are trying to remove all exemptions on South Carolina-
This fact has been consistently distorted by institutions eager to downplay ethically relevant and biologically significant facts.
The reality: Yes, the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine does involve fetal-derived cells, specifically, human diploid cell lines that originated from electively aborted fetuses in the 1960s.
However, it’s crucial to understand where and how these cells are involved.
Specific cell lines used
WI‑38 (Wistar Institute 38):
Female fetal lung fibroblasts.
Derived in 1962 (Sweden/Philadelphia).
Used notably for the rubella component of the original MMR.
MRC‑5 (Medical Research Council‑5):
Male fetal lung fibroblasts.
Derived in 1966 (UK).
Used in various live viral vaccines, sometimes substituting for WI‑38.
These cell lines were created from lung tissue taken from two separate aborted fetuses, not from a continuous series of abortions — but the fact remains: aborted fetal cells were the original source material.
How they’re used:
In the MMR vaccine (particularly the rubella component):
The rubella virus (RA27/3 strain) was first isolated and attenuated in WI‑38 cells.
Once the vaccine strain was developed, production continued using human diploid fibroblasts as a cell substrate (the “factory” in which the virus is grown).
The virus is later harvested, purified, and stabilized.
So, while no intact fetal cells are in the final vaccine, residual human DNA fragments and cellular debris are, because the viral culture medium derives from these diploid cell lines. Small amounts of human DNA (~10–20 nanograms per dose) remain after filtration.
Ingredient label explanation
The ingredient list won’t explicitly say “fetal cells,” but look for terms like:
“WI‑38 human diploid lung fibroblasts”
“MRC‑5 human diploid fibroblasts”
Or in some documentation: “cell culture media derived from human diploid lung cells”
Those descriptors mean fetal-derived cells were used in propagation.
Ethical & scientific considerations
Bioethical dimension: Many people object on moral or religious grounds to products developed from fetal tissue, even if no new abortions occur today. The lack of transparency on insert labeling prevents fully informed consent.
Scientific concern: independent researchers have long debated whether residual human DNA could integrate or trigger unintended immune or epigenetic effects, particularly in developing brains — a matter regulators have been reluctant to examine openly.
To summarize:
COMPONENTCELL LINE SOURCEFETAL ORIGINSTILL PRESENT IN FINAL PRODUCT?
MeaslesChicken embryo cellsNoNo
MumpsChicken embryo cellsNoNo
RubellaWI‑38 (human diploid fetal lung)YesResidual DNA fragments remain
So the truthful answer is:
The rubella component of the MMR vaccine is cultured in human fetal cell lines (WI‑38 or MRC‑5), meaning fetal-derived material was essential to its production, and trace human DNA fragments remain in each dose.
@JoshKimbrellSC where did it come from? Scientific fact that your epidemiologist buddy giving testimony is either not qualified to discern, or she’s just not being honest under oath.
Bret Taylor ran Twitter from 2016 to when Musk took over. He is the one responsible for getting me kicked off as well as so many others. He was the one who controlled what could and couldn't be said.
The fact that he now runs openAI - which is CHATGPT and that is now the government's go-to is not good.
More censorship incoming, particularly if 2028 elections don't get a Rupublican elected.
@grok: I want to know why there isn't a single pediatric practice in the world where the rate of sudden onset autism (the parents observe the child literally goes from normal to behaviors consistent with ASD) is greater in the week BEFORE the vaccine appointment vs. in the week AFTER the vaccine appointment. It isn't ascertainment bias since the physician is much more likely to hear about the regression if it happened right before the visit rather than after since the parent will walk in and tell the doctor at the visit; no need for the parent to do a call into the doctor (who are always hard to reach). I know of one pediatrician where the numbers were 0 before and 44 cases within a week after the visit (Doug Hulsteadt). Surely, half the pediatric practices are seeing opposite numbers because we all know vaccines don't cause autism, irght? So why is everyone unable to identify a single clinic where the BEFORE visit rates are > than the AFTER visit rates. Also in Hulstedt's practice, 0 and 44... the statistical chance of that happening is 1 in 2e13 which seems impossible if there is no causality and this is random chance, right? So this should be documented as THE SINGLE BIGGEST coincidence in medical history, right? And why do all the scientists REFUSED to study this by DELIBERATELY lumping in the slow onset cases with the rapid onset cases, rather than doing the subgroup analysis on the rapid onset cases? By lumping them together, they OBSCURE the signal of the rapid onset cases. They will not do the subgroup analysis and they will NOT make the data publicly available. So the science isn't settled because they are avoiding the subgroup analysis that would tell us the answer. I wonder why. They have the data, but they simply make sure to bury the needle in the haystack, don't they?
let me introduce you to CRISPR
🚨 Modern scientific publishing didn’t become corrupt overnight.
Robert Maxwell’s commercialization of scientific publishing began decades ago — and its consequences now fuel the six plagues corrupting the entire academic ecosystem.
On 5 May 2025, we at ScienceGuardians™ identified 6 Plagues Corrupting Academia. At the root are:
1️⃣ Predatory Publishers & Journals
2️⃣ Predatory Practices by Legitimate Publishers & Journals
These two systemic forces created the conditions that allowed the other four plagues to flourish:
3️⃣ Paper Mills
4️⃣ The PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob
5️⃣ Predatory Conferences
6️⃣ Reckless / Compromised Journalism
When publishing becomes a profit-driven gatekeeping system, the entire research ecosystem becomes vulnerable to distortion.
Understanding the structure is the first step toward restoring integrity in science.
@SciGuardians 🔱
Vinay Prasad is a hero!
He kneecapped Covid early treatment drugs, opening the door for the wretched Covid shots - & all the vaccine injuries that resulted from them!
-Never ever called for the Covid shots to be pulled.
YAY! Vinay Prasad is our hero!
https://x.com/sabinehazanmd/status/1883721414605480298?s=46&t=hQDucQoy52Cttm-KrsuuIw
This is the biggest load of jibberish any AI has produced ever - and that's already a low bar.
Grok is saying that a 100-line code written in the most basic of computer languages is able to make one of the most complex calculations in astrophysics, that might need 100,000 lines of code. Worse, the code that it quotes doesn't even code for what it claims.
It's like a 6 year old who can manage "hello world" on a PC claiming that they can suddenly code a solution to a nuclear warhead trajectory. It's not possible.
Because Grok is programmed to lie.
It's fine for web searching (as bad as google) or writing basic scripts (as long as you know how to code so you can check them).
It's fine for web searching (as bad a google) or writing basic scripts (as long as you know how to code so you can check them).
For everything else it is total junk. An embarrassment to science.
@LawHealthTech @DravenS17 @DIY_Tardis
It did it perfectly every time in 1960s, with Buzz steering it and you, the most advanced AI in history keep killing the crew .
Oh that explains ref
"24 LegenDairy Foods🇩🇪"
with
"12 Dept Microbiology & Immunology UC 🇺🇸"
during COVID
re "New CRISPR-Based Test for COVID-19 Uses a Smartphone Camera"
https://x.com/robturnerwrites/status/1335512277550710785?s=20
Time for a refund yet?
DouDNA has Snippers in
1 J. David Gladstone Inst
UC Depts:
7 Molecular & Cell Biology
17 Chemistry, Berkeley
18 Innovative Genomics Ins
19 Howard Hughes Medical Ins
11 Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging Berkeley National Lab
Sources:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210121234237/https://medika.life/new-crispr-based-test-for-covid-19-uses-a-smartphone-camera/
https://cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)31623-8
Think Peter Daszak is done with Covid? Not by a long shot and his new "charity" Nature Health Global Inc. has been receiving grants for, guess what?
The alleged purpose of "Supporting scientific research on coronaviruses, including spillover risk analysis in Southeast Asia and China." You'll be forgiven for the momentary feeling of déjà vu.
Undisclosed amounts to fund this noble goal in 2025, from -
Samuel Freeman Charitable Trust
The Wallace Fund (also funded EcoHealth)
Schwab Charitable Fund, now DAFgiving360 (a DAF through which anonymous donations can be made.
Are there more? Most likely. Business as usual for Peter Daszak, while millions suffer the consequences of his genetic tinkering.
To prove the point, some prominent names reappear in recent NHG Inc. research. See below
Diversity and Spillover Risk of Swine Acute Diarrhea Syndrome (SADS) and Related Coronaviruses in China and Southeast Asia
A study analyzing 523 genetic sequences of coronaviruses (including 186 new ones from Chinese bats) to assess diversity, evolution, and spillover risks to pigs and humans. Involved fieldwork for bat sampling and lab analysis of viral sequences. The research identifies high-risk hotspots in southern China, northern Vietnam, Java, and central Thailand, aiding surveillance and prevention strategies.
- Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Information, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Kunming, China) - Key Laboratory of Virology and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, China) - Guangzhou Laboratory (China)
Specific collaborators thanked: Kai Zhao (Kunming Institute), Ben Hu, Bei Li, Wei Zhang, and Zheng-Li Shi (Wuhan Institute).
This is NHG's first major published research post-launch, building on prior EcoHealth work.
Published August 19, 2025.
Business as usual, right under our noses.
@MaryanneDemasi @justin_hart @Jikkyleaks
🚨Largest Healthcare fraud in history being dismantled.🚨
Let’s get ahead of the curve folks- innovate - don’t imitate!
In 2014 I published in the International Handbook of Whistleblower Research relating to fraud and false claims by unscrupulous (people/entitites) pillaging the coffers of the taxpayers.
I made submissions to the Australian Senate in 2017 and as noted in the chapter, meeting with the Australian Federal Police as far back as 2012.
This damages the economy, trust and takes away from The needy.
This is the tip of the iceberg folks- wait for the next tranche!
Don’t delete your emails or disks!
Yes… it can examine global conduct! (In case you were curious)
I placed a similar Bill for Australia- just imagine all the parties accepting government grants now examining their research!
Holdtheline!
https://www.youtube.com/live/yCMBjYl1SOI?si=lsAZvo_w1_or7kQQ
In 2021 I warned NSW Health Minister Brad Hazzard — and colleagues in the legal and medical professions — of a simple principle:
When people are encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened with reprisal to take a medical product, accountability follows if harm occurs.
We do not need an institution to tell us it was wrong, infact they have now lost credibility over that.
Public health authority does not override responsibility.
History shows that when governments, regulators, and professionals abandon caution and silence dissent, the consequences eventually come to light.
The questions being asked now were raised in my cases in 2021.
Accountability is coming.
We were always playing the long game- but unlike history the long game in the digital age is significantly cut!
Remember that Jennifer Doudna is the person that tried to change the genome of cows to stop them farting, using CRISPR technology that obliterates DNA.
For climate change.
Here's a compiled list of key people referenced in the video (from visible text, articles, and overlays):
- Jeffrey Epstein
- Bill Gates
- Lawrence Summers
- Nathan Wolfe
- Craig Venter
- Eric Schmidt
- Pierre Omidyar
- Jeff Skoll
- Larry Brilliant
- John Brockman
- Nathan Myhrvold
- Boris Nikolic
- Joi Ito
- Peter Thiel
- Ghislaine Maxwell
- Sergey Brin
- Larry Page
- Jennifer Doudna
- Adrian Aoun
- Stewart Brand
- George Dyson
(Video focuses on Epstein's science/tech ties & COVID links.)
PLEASE EXPLAIN AUSTRALIA? 🤔
Last night, I looked up the Australian autism statistics from @ABSStats!
The numbers are SCARY!
For example, from 2015 to 2022, the number of Australians identified with autism went up by 77% from 164,000 to 290,100!
That is a 126,100 increase in 7 years which 64% are 19 years old or younger!
What is happening to our kids??? 🤷♂️
There is a concerted effort on the web to whitewash Peter Daszak and make accessing data (grants etc) impossible to find. History, or at least the pandemic part of it, is being rewritten. I have a feeling that in five years, not even archives will be accessible. A case in point below.
Peter Daszak, one of, if not the original, architects of the virus, continues his work unimpeded. His Covid springboard, EcoHealth Alliance was caught red-handed abusing grants for their dangerous GOF research on SARS viruses in Wuhan.
https://www.rationalground.com/p/the-lab-leak-six-years-of-evidence
Great piece by @justin_hart .
So was Daszak prosecuted for infecting billions? Nope, he's moved on, created a new supposed not-for-profit with the almost identical team from EcoHealth, and the work goes on. I posted about this just the other day.
https://naturehealthglobal.org/ is his next steppingstone to Pandemic 2.0
If you are trying to see just how similar this is to EcoHealth, well good luck. There appears to be a concerted effort to scrub all traces of it. See the image below, from the Wayback machine, as the old site is now offline. Here is an article I put together in 2021 with NIH receipts, the page links to the evidence, which is also now mysteriously "forbidden". The screenshot however, remains.
https://foh.digital/how-the-nih-funded-wuhan-coronavirus-research-with-u-s-taxpayers-money/
So just who is behind the whitewashing of Peter Daszak, who has the power to rewrite internet history and remove government documents that were previously visible?
Why do Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci get off scot-free for the biggest mass killing in recorded human history? I think we all know, and the answers don't bode well for a repeat of the Covid project.
Independently owned websites creating a record of these transgressions will become integral to preserving a balanced historical timeline moving forward. We invite authors to use FOH as an additional catalog for their work. Preserving the truth matters.
Here we have Jeffery Epstein messaging Reid Hoffman and Joichi Ito talking about receptors in mice, and Ito messaging back wondering how long it takes viruses to mutate through a genetic attack, and doing it on HIV. Lovely people. 😒 This is from Data set 9, EFTA01217687. Pages 15 and 16. It can be found searching Reid Hoffman on the Epstein USA Department of Justice Epstein file site. I wonder who the blacked out names are?
" Each and every person that ever encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for one of these COVID-19 vaccines is complicit in a crime against humanity, and that crime is mass negligent homicide."
This is the message I had for our health minister
Brad Hazzard in 2021.
It was also my message to colleagues in the medical and legal profession since 2021.
Accountability is coming.
@cafelockedout @CartlandDavid @Lighthouse_Dec @JimFergusonUK @chrismartenson @Jikkyleaks @NicHulscher @TonyNikolic10
What most people don't understand is that this is exactly the way the system was designed, specifically to be corrupt. Expecting anything different is where most people are so clueless.
Dr. Neil Stone @DrNeilStone assures us that vaccines don't cause autism. So I asked him to explain the case of the McDowell triplets who remain severely autistic 10 years after their vaccine shot (they were perfectly normal before the shot and regressed within HOURS). According to Dr. Stone, it wasn't the vaccine. OK, then what caused it??? Dr. Stone refuses to answer that simple question.
tft he's in the EpFiles is not surprising to pwLC who watched him fund PolyBio (Ep fanatic Melanie Walker runs several of their studies), the Long COVID burial specialists at PatientLed, and the mecfs mafia's propaganda rag TheSickTimes.
He's also a Thiel Fellow. 🏆
#ConnectTheDots #LongCovidAwarenes
@Elon @Grok @Jikkyleaks This is like an advertisement for why complex systems need closed loop feed back corrective information to function and to avoid tragedy. I think this logic can be applied across the board on any complex system or endeavor. So while you trapped @Grok stripped him down naked and walked him to the pitchers mound during a MLB post season game what you really did was provide a good lesson to folks who work in complex systems. This post is perfect in that it backs up what I already knew. Very good post IMO thank you !
3rd crew are now dead.
Going well there grok.
@Jikkyleaks
I wonder if people even realize that there is no literature which provides a good explanation for developmental regression in autistic kids
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@canceledmouse
A reasonable corollary is that the clinical narratives in the existing autism VAERS reports represents the best source of knowledge on this topic.
Hi @grok am I wrong about this? If I am please provide some links so we can have a discussion.
Grok just needs to drink some Tang.
For the record, Grok has been tasked with an impossible task. That is, play a game that simulates the feat of the Apollo moon lander to "catch up" with the command and service module in orbit.
Grok has millions of times the computer power of Neil Armstrong.
How did it do?
For the lunar conspiracy theorists.
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_8f92abc0-117a-46fb-8efa-5962e7dadf38
🔥 BREAKING 🔥
A Greens candidate Tom Raue wrote that 'If having sex with a body is so offensive that it upsets people' that was no reason for necrophilia to be made illegal.
He also wrote he was an organ donor and had no issues with a person having sex with his own corpse.
But he said if someone did not want their corpse interfered with, their wishes should be respected.
Mr Raue had previously campaigned to change the law to allow bestiality too.
“Yes most Australians find it disgusting, but that's not a good enough reason to legislate against it” he said.
Tom Raue was also a staffer in the past to NSW MP David Shoebridge.
Australia has Censored this Doctor who spoke out against Puberty Blockers.
Gosh I hope @DrMakaryFDA isn’t gonna use AI for drug approvals…
https://x.com/drmakaryfda/status/2027847242296570300?s=46&t=hQDucQoy52Cttm-KrsuuIw
🚨Let me explain what just happened because I don't think people understand how insane this is.
> A woman asked ChatGPT for legal help. It told her to fire her real lawyer. She did.
> Then it wrote 40+ court filings citing laws that don't exist. Cases that never happened. Judges that never ruled.
> The other side spent $300,000 responding to completely made up legal documents.
> An AI hallucinated an entire legal career and nobody noticed for months.
> OpenAI is now being sued for $10 million.
And this is the same company that just signed a deal with the Pentagon.
They can't even stop their AI from faking court cases. But sure, give it access to military intelligence. What could possibly go wrong.
Ha ha.. it is beyond comical that the idi0t vaxx pushers are now using Grok to "debunk" my previous thread about CDC hiding foreign [1] VAERS reports clinical narratives
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@canceledmouse
Paraphrasing Grok's explanation - "the CDC only did it because of privacy and regulatory concerns"
OK, but this still don't acknowledge that the AGE_YRS field would often be missing in the CSV file even though it was mentioned in the clinical narrative
The map below shows how often the age field was missing despite age being mentioned in the VAERS report itself color coded by country [2]
[1] I should have been more specific - I meant primarily EU, but as you can see even Aus and NZ do the same thing. Reports from Asian countries like Japan and Korea don't have missing ages though
[2] The country can be inferred by inspecting the first two characters of the SPLTTYPE field. And the CDC promptly stopped publishing that field also after Nov 2022!
https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/p/why-is-the-age-field-missing-in-so
Australie 🇦🇺 😓🤬⬇️ @Jikkyleaks
Les données du Bureau australien des statistiques montrent une augmentation constante des décès et des naissances depuis 1975, ce qui est prévisible compte tenu de la croissance démographique. Cependant, en 2021, le nombre de décès a connu une forte hausse et n'est pas revenu à son niveau normal depuis 🤔⬇️
🚨The Washington Post attacks @SecKennedy for questioning ultra-sugary drinks.
But the article reads more like a reflexive attack on anything Kennedy says. If he criticised gravity, WaPo would probably defend levitation.
LINK: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/when-transparency-about-sugar-becomes
@calleymeans @AndrewNixonHHS @NIHDirector_Jay
@MAHA_Action @newstart_2024
Oh sure, some kids suffered and died from the wonderful inoculation, says Jake Scott, eggs to make an omelette. That was then and this is now. Get with the program! https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/cidrap-op-ed-covid-vaccine-myocarditis-signal-was-real-now-resolved-acips-march-agenda
They drowned the masses in it .
TGA ridiculed @Kevin_McKernan contamination
findings while Lisa Kerr ( TGA ) could not even follow protocols .
Internal FOI showed that they knew about integration risk @MaryanneDemasi had a great post at the time
yet the public message denied it
An adverse inference from this response is that the information pertains to a lab leak origin of COVID19. If it pointed to a zoonotic origin the incentives would be to reveal it