Die günstigste Form der Energieerzeugung ist also nur finanzierbar, wenn der Rest der Gesellschaft den Hausbesitzern ihre PV-Anlage bezahlt. 🤣
The reason academics don’t like social media and are agitating to get it banned is because it’s where they publicly get pantsed for being midwits and their gay credentials don’t hold the power that they’re used to having. They can’t actually win logically.
Warum hat Island trotz 100% Erneuerbaren weiterhin eine Grundlast von ca. 1,8GW? Können das vielleicht @VQuaschning oder @solarpapst erklären?
Every AI coding tool on earth generates Python and JavaScript instead of binary. That fact alone tells you everything about where we actually are.
Generating working binary requires solving all of these problems simultaneously in a single forward pass: CPU architecture selection (x86, ARM, RISC-V all need different instruction sets), register allocation (deciding which of 16-32 physical registers holds which value at every cycle), memory layout (stack frames, heap allocation, pointer arithmetic, alignment), system call interfaces (every OS exposes different kernel APIs), linking (resolving symbols across shared libraries at specific memory addresses), and optimization passes that current compilers handle through 50+ sequential transformation stages.
GCC’s optimization pipeline alone runs over 200 distinct passes on your code before producing a binary. Each pass depends on the output of the previous one. An AI generating binary directly would need to internalize all 200 passes as a single learned function.
For context, look at the bottom of this tweet. Researchers just published a paper on a 491-parameter transformer they trained to do 10-digit addition. A survey of 180 public LLMs found only 7% can reliably add numbers. The task being described here is to addition what landing on Mars is to a paper airplane.
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and every tool that actually ships production software generates human-readable code. Python and JavaScript aren’t the bottleneck. They’re the interface that lets humans verify what the AI built, debug when it breaks, audit for security vulnerabilities, and iterate when requirements change.
The compile step takes milliseconds. The part that takes hours is figuring out what the software should actually do, handling edge cases, and making sure it doesn’t break in production. High-level languages compress that problem into something a human and an AI can reason about together.
Skipping the human-readable layer doesn’t remove complexity. It hides it. And hidden complexity in software is how you get systems that work in demos and explode in production.
Why Wokies Can't Write
Did you ever wonder why wokies can't write good fiction?
No, it's not just because they insist on making every story a soapbox to deliver a lecture from. They do that, but it's covering up a far deeper problem.
That's why they write stories that suck even when they are compelled to stop preaching for five minutes by the threat of immanent bankruptcy.
Even when they try to write a story that's just a story, they're no good at it, because they lack the one most critical skill that a fiction author must have.
Empathy.
Yeah, you read that correctly. Wokies lack empathy. Yes, they say they have loads of it, they berate the chuds for lacking it, they talk about it constantly.
But wokies are actually defined by their lack of empathy. Lacking empathy is the very thing that makes them wokies.
And they are blind to this fact because they don't know what empathy really is.
They think it means being nice to people or having sympathy for them or thinking well of them. But it means none of these things.
Empathy means the ability to understand someone else's point of view.
Doesn't mean you like him. Doesn't mean you trust him. Doesn't mean you want to invite him to your country or let him babysit your kids. Doesn't mean you want to excuse his crimes.
It just means you know what he's thinking, how he feels, and why he does what he does.
Wokies are wokies because they have little or no empathy. They don't understand other people. They only understand themselves.
When they try to understand other people, they do so by assuming that everyone is like them.
If they are nice, sweet, good-natured people, they will assume that George Floyd was just like them, and he only robbed people because he wasn't given enough money or hugs.
If they are sociopathic thugs like George Floyd, they will assume that middle class professional are just like them, and the only reason they don't rob banks is because they are too scared to take the risk.
But whoever they are, this is why they subscribe to blank-slatist theories of human nature. This is why they say dumb things like "there is only one race, the human race", when they would never say there are no dog breeds. This is why they want to invite Pushtun tribesmen to their nice middle class American neighborhoods and expect them to fit in. It's why they want to hug serial murderers and forgive them instead of hanging them from the nearest oak tree.
It's why they insist every show on television has to include a character who looks and talks exactly like them.
Because they can't identify with anyone who doesn't.
It's why when they adapt, for TV, the story of a fantasy-world hedge knight, written by someone who actually read some medieval history, it's full of irrelevant brown people, childhood backstory inserts, saxophone soundtrack music, and snarky millenial dialogue.
It's why when they have to write their own stories, they write snarky dialogue about minor Chinese-American intergenerational trauma that they have because their parents lacked empathy, too.
This shit is fascinating to them, and they can't even conceive of the very obvious fact that everyone else in the room is stifling a yawn.
And it's not just why they can't come up with interesting stories, it's also why they can't actually write.
Empathy is the primary skill of a fiction writer, because every moment that you are actually sitting at your desk, banging away on your keyboard, trying to write something compelling about a fictional guy in a fictional situation, what you have to do is empathize in two directions at once.
You must empathize with the character, who is a bit like you but not completely, to understand and convey what he's thinking, what it feels like for him to be where he is, and what he's likely to do.
And you must simultaneously empathize with the reader, who is a bit like you but not completely, and isn't there for you to observe, so you can present all of the above in a way that's interesting to him.
And wokies can't do either one, because they have no empathy, and can only understand themselves.
So they write stories about carbon copies of themselves, for carbon copies of themselves. And no one is interested except carbon copies of themselves.
Which is why even wokies don't consume wokie stories at anything like the rate that chuds read chud stories. Because wokies are not actually all the same except in their lack of empathy. They just think they are. So they get served stories that they ideologically approve of, and will write a social media post in support of, but they don't really follow those stories too much, because they're actually not that into it.
After all, even if you choose to write a self-insert character, you still need the empathy to make that character interesting to someone who isn't a self-insert reader.
Good authors can write stories about characters and situations that all compelling for people who like those characters and situations.
Great authors can write characters who are understandable and interesting to readers who are totally different from both author and character.
Wokies can only barely manage to entertain clones of themselves.
g ≈ π² is not a coincidence.
The original idea for the definition of “1 meter” was the length of a pendulum with a half-period of 1 second.
The formula for a pendulum’s period is:
T = 2π √(L / g)
If you plug in L = 1 m and T = 2 s, you get g = π² m/s².
The actual definition of “1 meter” was eventually chosen as 10⁻⁷ of a half-meridian passing through Paris, but this was inspired by the earlier pendulum-based definition. The two definitions agree to within 1%.
Siri, was ist Totalitarismus?
Linke Rabulistiker am Limit.
Mit 20GW Kernkraft hätte man 2 Millionen Wärmepumpen mit 10kW gleichzeitig betreiben können. Die Heizungswende ist mit dem Ende der Kernkraft auch gestorben. Genau wie die Mobilitätswende sterben wird.
Man kann einfach schlecht Bürger eines Landes dazu zwingen, Stromheizungen einzubauen, wenn das zeitliche Stromversorgungsprofil 2035 in etwa so aussehen wird. Da ist noch nicht mal die zusätzliche Last durch Millionen Stromheizungen und Elektroautos berücksichtigt.
Wenn das stimmt stehen alle doof da, die auf Quaschning gehört haben und ohne Not ihre günstige Heizung getauscht haben.
Anhänger des Klimawandels und der Erneuerbaren sind tatsächlich so dämlich, der Öl- und Gasindustrie unter die Arme zu greifen, indem sie überall Clownstromanlagen aufstellen, die fossile Backups benötigen.
Es ist bestimmt Zufall, dass all die Fans von 2G auch Fans von Social-Media-Beschränkungen sind. Das sind trotzdem die Guten, ganz sicher.
I’m convinced that people who believe most humans are kind and good have never spoken out about anything difficult.
Once you stick your neck out about a high-stakes topic — no matter how logical and defensible your position — the devils come out of the woodwork to punish you. It totally shatters the illusion that “people,” in a general sense, mean well.
Evil people HATE when you speak the truth with conviction. They HATE when you call out cruelty and manipulation and apathy and sadism and narcissism, even if it has absolutely nothing to do with them. They will attack you because that’s the side they work for. The bad side. It’s like a feeding frenzy.
Evil people count on a status quo of passive, cowardly diplomacy. When you speak up, you threaten their sickly homeostasis, and they come for you.
Ich spürte eine große Erschütterung der Macht, als ob Millionen von Stimmen plötzlich in Schrecken aufschrien und dann jäh verstummten.
Am vergangenen Mittwoch war ich Zuschauer im Arbeitsgericht Mainz. Verhandelt wurde die Klage des „frontal“-Journalisten Joe Sperling gegen seine fristlose Kündigung durch das #ZDF. Der Vorwurf des Senders: Sperling habe dem Ansehen des ZDF geschadet.
🧵1/6
Autoritäre Konservative und ein völlig enthemmter Staatsfunk erzählen den Menschen gerade wirklich, dass das größte Problem Deutschlands gerade ist, dass Friedrich Merz von SchalkeFan85 beleidigt werden könnte, und ihm das nicht passt. 🤣
Für geübte Verschwörungstheoretiker ist das ganze Thema "Social-Media-Verbote ab 16" , das inzwischen durch leichtes Nudging des Overton-Fensters natürlich sofort bei "Klarnamenpflicht im Internet" angekommen ist (das mit den Kindern ist wohl doch gar nicht der Grund gewesen, sowas...), weniger ein Grund zur Panik, sondern viel mehr ein Signal des inneren Zustands der Systeme:
Eine solche Pflicht würde vor allem Menschen treffen, die öffentlich "whistleblowen", also die Missstände der Institutionen offenlegen, in denen sie tätig sind. Und daher hat offensichtlich das politische System eine Scheißangst davor, dass die Zustände und Lügen öffentlich werden. Was ein Signal dafür ist, dass es rumort bei Polizei, Feuerwehr, Behörden. Der Versuch, durch solche offensichtlich plumpen Drohungen die eigenen Mitarbeiter einzuschüchtern, zeigt, dass sie inzwischen mehr und mehr die Kontrolle verlieren, und daher die Reihen schließen wollen.
Es ist für alle, die diesen Systemen misstrauen, also ein positives Zeichen. Es gibt offenbar im ÖD mehr und mehr Menschen, die die Zustände und Lügen nicht länger mittragen wollen.
Unheimliche Entwicklung:
Politiker werden in DE/EU immer stärker geschützt (188§, Meldestellen, DSA-Trusted Flagger, Staatsunterstützung für Medien)
Während Bürgern immer mehr Schutz weggenommen werden soll (DSA V2026, Social Verbot, Klarnamenpflicht, Chatkontrolle, VPN weg, Digital ID, Vorratsdatenspeicherung etc)
Es sind heute -9°C und Sonntag werden es voraussichtlich +8°C sein, Kiel erwärmt sich innerhalb von vier Tagen zehnmal schneller als der Rest der Welt. Niemand kann mehr den Klimawandel leugnen.
Es ist kein Wunder, dass Social-Media-Verbote für Kinder von den gleichen Tyoen ersonnen werden, die auch Messerverbotszonen erfunden haben. Ein Social-Media-Verbot wird Kinder vor Informationen schützen, weil Verbote Kinder immer schon abgehalten haben, etwas zu tun.
Ich sehe den nächsten Krieg der geistigen Tiefflieger gegen die Mathematik aufziehen.
"Aber die Didaktiker sagen, dass das richtig ist, und außerdem hat der Lehrer und damit die Exekutive immer Recht!"
Sich etwas aufzubrezeln um Staatsbetriebe zu trollen ist eigentlich auch ein cooles Hobby.
Progressiver Steuersatz einfach der populistische Himmel für Linke:
Steuererhöhungen belasten „die Reichen“ mehr.
Steuersenkungen kann man bekämpfen indem man auf die „viel höheren Entlastungen für <Reiche>“ hinweist.
Was nach dem ZDF-KI-Fake als nächstes passieren wird:
1. Dunja Hayali zieht sich wegen "Hass und Hetze" für ein paar Tage vom heute journal von Social Media zurück
2. SPD, Grüne und CDU fordern Ausweis- und Klarnamenpflicht im Internet
3. Demo gegen Rechts und Trump
Regular reminder that what libs describe as "empathy" is actually narcissistic projection, the objects of their sollicitude only exist in their minds as toys, not actual people with their own thoughts and feelings. They are quite literally incapable of empathy, properly defined (being able to put yourself in others' shoes.)
Das Verhalten der DLRG, Mitglieder aufgrund politischer Gesinnung auszuschließen, hat Parallelen in der deutschen Geschichte:
- NS-Zeit: Die DLRG selbst schloss 1933 Juden aus (Arierparagraph) und kooperierte mit NS-Organisationen (Quelle: Studien zur NS-Aufarbeitung der DLRG, 2025).
- DDR: Politisch Andersdenkende wurden oft aus Vereinen und Sportgruppen ausgeschlossen, um die SED-Linie durchzusetzen (z.B. Oppositionelle in Freizeitvereinen).
Weitere Beispiele existieren, aber diese sind prominent.
Der Sinn des heute Journals ist der gleiche wie der der "Zwei Minuten Hass" in 1984: Die aufgestaute Wut und Unzufriedenheit mit der eigenen Regierung, und die gefühlte Machtlosigkeit, soll umgeleitet werden auf jemand daran völlig Unschuldigen, Donald Trump.
Eine weitere Massenpsychose endet.
This is a key point: the idea that imprisoning criminals won’t reduce crime tacitly assumes that there’s some kind of crime quota, and other people will start assaulting strangers if we lock up the people currently doing it.