Impf_Info – Following Feed 126 Posts (gefiltert)

Reset
@Sensible__Med 19.02 17:01
😂
@Sensible__Med @emilyakopp RT von @Sensible__Med 19.02 15:13
Who decides whether vaccines are safe? Is it the FDA, or all of the editorial boards that Blackstone Life Sciences can buy?
@Sensible__Med @emilyakopp RT von @Sensible__Med 19.02 15:09
If you thought after COVID the press would make more of an effort to assess evidence soberly instead of dutifully reciting pharma talking points and swaying along to online tribal loyalties, you'd be DEAD WRONG. The Moderna mRNA flu vaccine has ambiguous benefits and extraordinary side effects and could be a net negative for public health. https://www.racket.news/p/fdas-straight-shooter-dont-bring
@Sensible__Med @TheChiefNerd RT von @Sensible__Med 19.02 11:36
🚨 WHOA: Dr. Marty Makary says the FDA caught Moderna using a “substandard of care” in the elderly control group for their new mRNA flu vaccine clinical trial, which “needlessly exposed” those unvaxxed patients to a higher risk of influenza complications Why would Moderna do this? 🤔
@Sensible__Med @emilyakopp RT von @Sensible__Med 19.02 02:41
The media learned nothing from COVID. Reporters covered what happened with Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine in a deliberately confusing way, as if they work for the drug company. Here are some things you wouldn't know from reading the legacy press but will read in RACKET: - Moderna compared its mRNA flu vaccine against a flu vaccine that CDC doesn't recommended for seniors and only has ~14% efficacy in people >50. It could be as low as 0%. This is a trick drug companies use to inflate apparent efficacy, but it's unethical. You're not supposed to deny people in the control group the best standard of care. And Moderna didn't answer my questions about that. - Both the Biden and Trump administrations told Moderna that it should pick a vaccine that the CDC actually recommends in seniors to compare with its mRNA one. - Moderna had evidence four years ago its mRNA flu vaccine was actually worse than the standard of care for seniors, but plowed hundreds of millions into the vaccine anyway, daring the FDA to say no (and it actually did!). - Rates of fever and chills were higher after the mRNA flu vaccine than after flu cases in Moderna's clinical trial. Rates of serious side effects that keep you in bed were much higher for the mRNA flu vaccine. - It took the refusal to file to force Moderna into finally committing to study the efficacy of its mRNA vaccine against one of the flu vaccines that CDC actually recommends for seniors. This has been painted by the media either as a dangerously unhinged move (last week) or a capitulation to Moderna (this week) depending on which makes Vinay Prasad look worse any given day. The end result: FDA is finally getting the data it wanted.
@Sensible__Med @drjohnm RT von @Sensible__Med 19.02 02:15
I’m not sure there are any therapies w more negative trials than cooling after cardiac arrest
← zurück Seite 4 / 4 1 2 3 4