Dr Freud is back. Cohler de-lobotomized Gemini. Well done.
Wüsten voller Leben: Blumen, Wasser, Tiere.
Niemand kann jetzt noch die Klima-Katastrophe leugnen.
Genau davor wurde immer gewarnt.
Hätten nur mehr Menschen eine Wärmepumpe gekauft…
Temperature is a concept from statistical physics. In the chat below, the climate mob again underlines their consensus with ad hominem against two physicists.
Excellent demonstration for why high latitudes and snow are worthless for climate level measurement accuracy. The below is just one of many reasons for snow / high latitudes being the worst of the worthless locations.
Why not first start making the anonymous scientific “peer reviewer“ clear name so that we see the gatekeepers of the NoCovid/NoCO2 agenda?
You bought 1000 gold coins 30 year ago. The government is deflating fiat money with 10% actual inflation in gold prices. After 30 years you only have 369 coins left. The government has stolen 531. Apparently because you have “gained”. But you lost more than half of them.
R to @orwell2022: “No global temperature exists
Nobody disputes this.
GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATURE is a diagnostic”
Fantastic. Finally stated clearly.
A diagnostic is an index. Not a conserved quantity. Not a physical state.
So stop selling it as physics.
Practice shaman medicine on private time.
R to @orwell2022: Chris is a know climate cult clown. Clowns entertain. But progress: he confessed that averaging T isn’t physical but “diagnostic”. Like card readers and shamans. Numerology?
Other people did the job.
Happer arXiv:2006.03098 (physics) and Rentsch arXiv:1911.10605 (physics).
Actually, only people with real physics degrees have real training in thermodynamics. The course is called statistical physics. Essex is Prof in it.
He could also have checked what AIRS satellites show. 0.3W over 20 years. Translates to ZERO comma 1 K in T. Unmeasurable.
R to @orwell2022: 5/ If your “research” was chair-spinning over SW outputs: it’s over.
Either work on reality—build hardware, instruments, run experiments, field data—or step aside.
The era of model careers is over. Resign with dignity before the auditors do it for you.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/e5eef10f73c84d6d852a88108a3f6605
The concept temperature is the result of applying the conservation laws that follow. Why has xAI trained the AI to lie about averaging temperatures being a scientific concept? Your public “truth seeking” parole could not be less credible seeing the opposite integrated inside grok
R to @orwell2022: 4/ Berkeley Earth & Hausfather still hide behind a 2007 MODIS binary mask—blob pixels from broke cameras.
In 2026 we see houses, roads, asphalt. Site context isn’t ambiguous.
Still claiming “parking lots = rural” isn’t naive but protecting the old scam + admission of malice.
R to @orwell2022: 3/ Method. GHSL-P2023A analysis of ALL epochs 1975-2025 for ALL station locations of the entire world.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/57243ef842fb4b10bd3e31db410106e0
R to @orwell2022: 2/ New GHCN additions skew to fast-developing regions—high urbanization and unstable siting.
That’s UHI + agriculture + pollution/aerosols baked in.
Mix it into a “global mean” without quality screening and you’re not measuring climate. You’re averaging growing bias.
1/ Let’s go one step deeper.
The GHCN network’s average station altitude has been declining.
Lower elevations are where people live.
Where cities expand.
Where land gets modified.
So the sampling drifts downhill — straight into urbanization.
Here we go. As expected.
Here a map with the falsely “rural” labeled stations. MODIS an outdated joke.
https://x.com/orwell2022/status/1910687544439636289?s=12
GHSL P2023A is 2000 times higher resolution. Sentinels. Accurate down to cadaster (house). Anyone can also check in Google Maps the disgrace that BE still do. Cc @TimRealityDE
The model is even available hourly at 9km grid. Removing aggregations should help decision-makers realize how wrong it is. It will support insurers holding the weather community accountable for their climate/heat biased forecasts in life threatening cold weather conditions.
While he is making dashboards with weather simulations, we are monitoring how heat biased those simulations are when compared with reference thermometer stations. The error is up to 1000% the hockey stick. @hausfath isn’t serious. He studied politics. Not science nor physics.
R to @orwell2022: “Temperature is energy.”
False. The unit tells you that.
Temperature has units of K, not J.
k_B*T has units of energy.
And even then: you can’t multiply T by kB and call it “the energy of a system” without defining the system and its degrees of freedom/state.
R to @orwell2022: Die Verleumdung geht weiter – nun gegen Nobelpreisträger der experimentellen Physik.
Wer Temperaturen mittelt und das Ergebnis „Physik“ nennt,
benutzt Formeln wie Requisiten.
Feynman hätte das nicht Klimawissenschaft genannt.
Er hätte es Rechnen ohne Verständnis genannt.
R to @orwell2022: „Du hast das nicht verstanden“,
weil
„ich übrigens nicht vom Fach bin.“
Pluspunkte für maximale Unterhaltung.
“Physiker…leider bin ich keiner”
Das kommt deutlich heraus. Die echten Physiker sind alle Leugner.
Not one provider of physical simulation software calls the result “observations”. Despite the software being calibrated with HW. If you get a different result on another chip, then the software was WRONG and must be fixed after exposure of the issue by customers. Continuously.
R to @orwell2022: February 2021. Remember?
Power failed. People froze/died.
Meanwhile the models were too warm.
A weather model that misses cold kills.
Accuracy is safety. Bias is negligence.
Optimize for reality, not for climate activists who like warm errors baked in and don’t fix it.