Global warming “crisis” is everywhere?
So why does it disappear the moment you leave town?
Too warm? Turn off the heating. Walk outside. Leave town.
Go to a national park.
Strange. The warming “disaster” doesn’t seem to like nature? It only impacts growing human settlements?
R to @orwell2022: 5/ The US is the only place with stations / sites compatible with climate accuracy — stable environment, free from urban impact, commitment to excellence.
That level of quality mindset is unique.
Elsewhere, almost nonexistent. Sole exception: Valentia IR @MetEireann
R to @orwell2022: 4/ Yes, you’ll find hockey sticks.
Look where they sit: urbanized locations.
That’s not a climate signal.
Now try this: find 5-10 truly rural stations (minimum/no urban built around at visual inspection) showing the warming shape?
Tell us the names if you find them. Good luck.
R to @orwell2022: 3/ Method:
Stations: ≥100 yrs, ≥9 months/yr
Built-up: GHSL, 5×5 km
Data:
GHCNv4M raw (QCU) http://doi.org/10.7289/V5XW4GTH
GHSL Built-S http://doi.org/10.2905/9F06F36F-4B11-47EC-ABB0-4F8B7B1D72EA
Tool built: Codex 5.4 (~25 min)
R to @orwell2022: 3/ Low built-up ≠ high-quality station. It’s a mandatory condition, not a guarantee.
Switch to sat view and inspect the site closely— the problems often shows up immediately. Like here.
Coastal locations
commonly have this issue. Water makes them appear rural. They aren’t.
Pinned: 2/ This map shows all stations with 100 years of data and at least 9 valid months per year.
That leaves about 500
🌎 https://orwell2024.github.io/builtmap/ 🌎
Stations are colored by the level of built-up area around the site. Click any station to view its details and temperature curve.
1/ Can you actually find a hockey stick in truly rural stations?
Not in a stitched statistical construct — in a real, coherent station record.
Here’s a tool to test it yourself.
Link below.
Real weather apps now (15:00 forecast): Take a jacket to stay warm.
R to @orwell2022: 4/ More. Asked to validate BU calculations on some examples. It did.
R to @orwell2022: 2/ Don’t believe it? Main time spent was layout.
Pinned: 1/ Impressed by Codex 5.4. Replicated the work from below thread in 15 min. From high level instructions only. That’s another 100x speed up compared to 2024 baby AI times.
R to @orwell2022: Time to remember another great American mind: Thomas Jefferson. He observed. Measured.
He possessed the scientific gene.
Climate “scientists” have PhDs, without having any recognizable scientific skills.
R to @orwell2022: Nice find. A great writer.
Physicist William Happer: NAS member; APS Broida & Davisson–Germer Prizes; Sloan Fellow; Humboldt Award. Former DOE Director of Energy Research and White House NSC Senior Director. Inventor of the sodium laser guide star (modern astronomy pioneer).
There we go. As expected.
“They were training socialist and not scientists”. Yes, we figured out empirically. Good for her that she did as well.
Of course they knew what they highlighted here while intentionally using age confounding during the pandemic.
Good catch by @KoudijsHenk.
Yes, this is a nice one. German Green Party excel agenda plugin can do it.
Codex: 94% weekly usage remaining. Please make it stop. Give us some rest and not just resets. We need to rest. The timeout…the human auto-compress break.
A good demo of what the age verification is about: surveillance of what you are reading. Oh so you want to read a critical scientific paper which exposes the climate agenda? You can do so after taking a picture of yourself and sending it to us.
R to @orwell2022: 'Healthy Life Years' are dropping while Life Expectancy breaks records exposes the flawed HLY. You don’t achieve rising LE by being unhealthy. This contradiction proves how useless and flawed SUBJECTIVE, self-reported health SURVEYS are."
👉Retire this set as it’s wrong.
Please note: the graph on the left is misleading. It is not an OBJECTIVE measurement like LE, but a SUBJECTIVE self-reported label from surveys. Sociology. Life expectancy is an objective outcome. Calculated from actual mortality data, not from self assigned survey responses.
Man beachte die Zeitskala. Im deutschen Staatsfunk („State Media“) bekommt man beim Wetter das Klima für 2100. Ohne Zwang würde niemand diesen Kanal freiwillig konsumieren. Mein Beileid für alle, die das bezahlen müssen.
Still like this work.
Though today it would probably take 10× less time with tools like Codex or Claude Code.
So—who wants to take a shot at replicating / extending it?
The tools exist now.
You have zero excuses.
Codex 5.4 xhigh should manage. It’s better than Opus 4.6 now.
R to @orwell2022: For those who missed the context. We tried to find stations that show that curve. But no one is existing. At least not if using NOAA climate measurement quality criteria.
-Stable environment.
-Fully free from urban activity.
-High-quality data / equipment. -Competent staff.
The measurements are NOT from different sources. They are the SAME. Collection of 99.9% urban garbage.
Ask him: show us 10 weather stations IDs based on ACCURACY QUALITY criteria (stable - urban free - 100 years) that show this curve.
He will _NOT_ be able to provide even one
R to @orwell2022: Amazing.
Dr Freud is back. Cohler de-lobotomized Gemini. Well done.
Wüsten voller Leben: Blumen, Wasser, Tiere.
Niemand kann jetzt noch die Klima-Katastrophe leugnen.
Genau davor wurde immer gewarnt.
Hätten nur mehr Menschen eine Wärmepumpe gekauft…
Temperature is a concept from statistical physics. In the chat below, the climate mob again underlines their consensus with ad hominem against two physicists.
Excellent demonstration for why high latitudes and snow are worthless for climate level measurement accuracy. The below is just one of many reasons for snow / high latitudes being the worst of the worthless locations.
Why not first start making the anonymous scientific “peer reviewer“ clear name so that we see the gatekeepers of the NoCovid/NoCO2 agenda?
You bought 1000 gold coins 30 year ago. The government is deflating fiat money with 10% actual inflation in gold prices. After 30 years you only have 369 coins left. The government has stolen 531. Apparently because you have “gained”. But you lost more than half of them.
R to @orwell2022: “No global temperature exists
Nobody disputes this.
GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATURE is a diagnostic”
Fantastic. Finally stated clearly.
A diagnostic is an index. Not a conserved quantity. Not a physical state.
So stop selling it as physics.
Practice shaman medicine on private time.
R to @orwell2022: Chris is a know climate cult clown. Clowns entertain. But progress: he confessed that averaging T isn’t physical but “diagnostic”. Like card readers and shamans. Numerology?
Other people did the job.
Happer arXiv:2006.03098 (physics) and Rentsch arXiv:1911.10605 (physics).
Actually, only people with real physics degrees have real training in thermodynamics. The course is called statistical physics. Essex is Prof in it.
He could also have checked what AIRS satellites show. 0.3W over 20 years. Translates to ZERO comma 1 K in T. Unmeasurable.
R to @orwell2022: 5/ If your “research” was chair-spinning over SW outputs: it’s over.
Either work on reality—build hardware, instruments, run experiments, field data—or step aside.
The era of model careers is over. Resign with dignity before the auditors do it for you.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/e5eef10f73c84d6d852a88108a3f6605
The concept temperature is the result of applying the conservation laws that follow. Why has xAI trained the AI to lie about averaging temperatures being a scientific concept? Your public “truth seeking” parole could not be less credible seeing the opposite integrated inside grok
R to @orwell2022: 4/ Berkeley Earth & Hausfather still hide behind a 2007 MODIS binary mask—blob pixels from broke cameras.
In 2026 we see houses, roads, asphalt. Site context isn’t ambiguous.
Still claiming “parking lots = rural” isn’t naive but protecting the old scam + admission of malice.