R to @orwell2022: 3/ Method. GHSL-P2023A analysis of ALL epochs 1975-2025 for ALL station locations of the entire world.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/57243ef842fb4b10bd3e31db410106e0
R to @orwell2022: 2/ New GHCN additions skew to fast-developing regions—high urbanization and unstable siting.
That’s UHI + agriculture + pollution/aerosols baked in.
Mix it into a “global mean” without quality screening and you’re not measuring climate. You’re averaging growing bias.
1/ Let’s go one step deeper.
The GHCN network’s average station altitude has been declining.
Lower elevations are where people live.
Where cities expand.
Where land gets modified.
So the sampling drifts downhill — straight into urbanization.
Here we go. As expected.
Here a map with the falsely “rural” labeled stations. MODIS an outdated joke.
https://x.com/orwell2022/status/1910687544439636289?s=12
GHSL P2023A is 2000 times higher resolution. Sentinels. Accurate down to cadaster (house). Anyone can also check in Google Maps the disgrace that BE still do. Cc @TimRealityDE
The model is even available hourly at 9km grid. Removing aggregations should help decision-makers realize how wrong it is. It will support insurers holding the weather community accountable for their climate/heat biased forecasts in life threatening cold weather conditions.
While he is making dashboards with weather simulations, we are monitoring how heat biased those simulations are when compared with reference thermometer stations. The error is up to 1000% the hockey stick. @hausfath isn’t serious. He studied politics. Not science nor physics.
R to @orwell2022: “Temperature is energy.”
False. The unit tells you that.
Temperature has units of K, not J.
k_B*T has units of energy.
And even then: you can’t multiply T by kB and call it “the energy of a system” without defining the system and its degrees of freedom/state.
R to @orwell2022: Die Verleumdung geht weiter – nun gegen Nobelpreisträger der experimentellen Physik.
Wer Temperaturen mittelt und das Ergebnis „Physik“ nennt,
benutzt Formeln wie Requisiten.
Feynman hätte das nicht Klimawissenschaft genannt.
Er hätte es Rechnen ohne Verständnis genannt.
R to @orwell2022: „Du hast das nicht verstanden“,
weil
„ich übrigens nicht vom Fach bin.“
Pluspunkte für maximale Unterhaltung.
“Physiker…leider bin ich keiner”
Das kommt deutlich heraus. Die echten Physiker sind alle Leugner.
Not one provider of physical simulation software calls the result “observations”. Despite the software being calibrated with HW. If you get a different result on another chip, then the software was WRONG and must be fixed after exposure of the issue by customers. Continuously.
R to @orwell2022: February 2021. Remember?
Power failed. People froze/died.
Meanwhile the models were too warm.
A weather model that misses cold kills.
Accuracy is safety. Bias is negligence.
Optimize for reality, not for climate activists who like warm errors baked in and don’t fix it.