SZwanglos – Following Feed

222 Posts (gefiltert)
Reset
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 24.02 10:12
The PCR was THE tool to fake the 2020 "Pandemic". To make sure it never happens again we must demonstrate how and why it is the fraudulent test it is.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 24.02 10:06
PCR Bullshit. 2020 saw an entire NFL team of 77 players test positive for "Sars Cov 2". This seemed suspicious as not a single one was ill. when they retested they were all Negative. They say this is a "False Positive", I say it is because the PCR is fraudulent.
@JamieAA_Again 24.02 09:45
R to @JamieAA_Again: https://pubmedinfo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/propagation-in-tissue-cultures-of-cytopathogenic-agents-from-patients-with-measles.pdf In his following sentence he says that once he further treated them with chemicals they "Could be distinguished" which is irrelevant. Any observable effect (CPE) found in a NEGATIVE Control (I.e a control where the observable effect should NOT be seen) is classed as a failure and the method should be junked. Instead it was adopted by the establishment as the gold standard and the fraud has perpetuated ever since.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 24.02 09:45
1954 John Enders developed what would become the Gold Standard for "Virus Isolation". Problem was in his own paper he inadvertently conducted a control with an Uninfected culture which in his own words produced CPE that could not be distinguished from the infected culture.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 23.02 20:50
Do you say Please and Thank you to AI? Might it make a difference? I tend to er on the side of caution, just incase of a self sentient robot takeover.
@JamieAA_Again 23.02 12:55
Old boy has taken his Farm Whip shopping.
@JamieAA_Again 23.02 08:49
There was a turning point in 1954 where John Enders claimed to "Isolate a Virus". Problem was in his own study his uninfected, negative control failed as he noted CPE in the cell line. Instead of junking this fraudulent procedure the establishment adopted it as Gold Standard.
@JamieAA_Again 23.02 08:46
It may be slightly intimidating but we have proved that it is more than possible to conduct scientific experiments using accredited independent Laboratories.
@JamieAA_Again 23.02 08:42
You Neighbor can't kill you with their Cough. Dispel the myth of Germ Theory and dispel the fear and paranoia.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 22.02 10:54
Epidemiological Data assumes causality. Whilst you can gain some information and get a sense of political data fraud it does NOT show anything to do with the causality of the data in the first place, that is why I disregard it.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 22.02 10:49
PCR, Genetics and Immunological tests are all Inferences from Lab Values, they are NOT direct evidence. In the realms of Inferences they are assigning a story to a lab value, that story has no evidence to back it up.
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 22.02 10:45
Virologists know that Contagion of Biological Pathogens is a hoax. This paper released in 2026 of purified "Virus" directly up healthy people's noses resulted in No Disease, Negative PCR and Negative Serological infection. https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1013153#ppat.1013153.ref007
@JamieAA_Again 22.02 09:25
I gave Jens an entire day. He commented he only wanted to do a live event and gave no reasons. Seems he is incapable of debate where he is accountable to public criticism and had nefarious intentions for his live debate. Typical.
@JamieAA_Again 22.02 09:22
This is a good initiative. Publish or Perish is the reason why Academia is fettered with frauds who just desperately needed to put food on the table.
@JamieAA_Again 21.02 21:44
Yeah you might have your arm raised for some time.
@JamieAA_Again 21.02 14:03
Precisely.
@JamieAA_Again 21.02 13:37
They are never shaking the stereotype of being Basement Dwelling losers. https://youtu.be/8H3dFuccSXQ?si=xJpBcGLpUIdYAp-G
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 21.02 10:23
The Analogy for why I believe that the microscopy work proves that "Viruses do not exist".
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 21.02 09:39
A Thread 🧵 Blind testing of Paternity Testing reveals 95.8% failure rate. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073805003944?via%3Dihub
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 21.02 09:22
I will move this out of comments and put it more "public". However "civil" you believe you will be there are still nuances to live debate that are lost such as actually displaying images/data and referencing. So it is always more conducive in the written word. So fire away, why do you think proteins exist in the exact way they are claimed and what part of my article on this subject is wrong?
@JamieAA_Again RT von @JamieAA_Again 20.02 22:34
Lol... Yes it is just that rounding up is noted as a specific Cytopathic Effect when you think you have put "Sars Cov 2" in it. This is according to the CLSI M41 Manual for Viral Isolation ( Not ME btw 😇)
@JamieAA_Again @courtenaymanx RT von @JamieAA_Again 20.02 11:57
My intense dislike of dyed hair fuckers was cemented (up close and personal) by meeting 'Prof' Luc Montagnier: a toadying frog, knee deep in 'HIV' & 'AIDS' fraud. He got the Nobel Prize for bolloxology. It's likely Jamie Andrews will get a Blue Peter badge https://rumble.com/v75vfr8-the-virus-cams...-when-jamie-andrews-met-courtenay-on-16th-feb-2026.html