SZwanglos – Following Feed

RT by @hjbertschi: You operate with data from the turn of the millennium. The largest domestic market in the world is now by far the USA (GDP $30 trillion), followed by the EU (22) and China (19).

RT by @hjbertschi: Accepting the integration treaty would mean, as the treaty suggests, the integration of Switzerland into the EU system‼️ Under no circumstances should something like this happen, even if the fake federal councilors and the EU branch @EDA_DFAE are doing everything they can to integrate Switzerland. @ignaziocassis ‼️

RT by @hjbertschi: EU accession quietly? Not even experts can tell us with certainty what will happen to Switzerland with the new treaties with Brussels

RT by @hjbertschi: System change changes the role of parliament - that's why the majority of estates is needed According to Art. 148 BV, our Federal Assembly is the “supreme power”. She actively shapes laws. With Bilaterals III, not only the content changes - the role of Parliament itself changes. The subtle but crucial difference: Previously (classic state treaty): Parliament adopts rules and implements them independently. Deadlines could be set, exceptions could be defined and details could be adapted to Swiss needs (e.g. protection of hydropower in the electricity market). New (Bilateral III): Parliament remains formally a legislature, but materially loses its formative function. The scope for your own adjustments (“Swiss Finish”) is severely limited. In practice, it is increasingly about following external guidelines. The consequence: It is not the skills that change - but the way in which they are exercised. Conclusion: If the Federal Assembly no longer freely shapes central areas but rather reacts primarily, this will change our state decision-making structure. This is an integration step within the meaning of Art. 140 BV - and absolutely requires the majority of the estates.

RT by @hjbertschi: ✅Switzerland is a beacon of crisis today because the debt brake and balanced budgets keep national debt low, while others go into debt and struggle with interest burdens. At the same time, an independent SNB ensures one of the mildest combinations of inflation and interest rates in the world - supported by the trustworthy safe haven franc. This strength is no coincidence, but the result of bottom-up federalism in which citizens have a say in taxes, spending and even cash versus purely digital currencies. Anyone who now binds themselves more closely to the EU with the Framework Agreement/Referendum III is diluting precisely this successful model and importing high debts, weak growth and over-regulated markets from a Europe that has already largely squandered its own strategic future.

#Crises are the new normal: Tomorrow's winners are states that make themselves #crisis-proof today - #Europe is not one of them - NZZ EU: - one-sided dependencies - inhibits innovative market forces - high national debt Switzerland weakens with EU connection. https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/kritiken-sind-das-neue-normal-die-gewinner-von-morgen-sind-jene-laender-die-sich-heute-kritikenfest-machen-haben-europa-zaehlt-nicht-dazu-ld.1931993?gift=wI4JPfRt

RT by @hjbertschi: The naive Swiss will totally fall for it:

RT by @hjbertschi: Ha, ha. 👉The EU exports more to Switzerland than the other way around... 👉We have the better universities and let tens of thousands study here... 👉We give jobs and income to 2 million EU citizens... 👉Most north-south transit routes run through Switzerland... 👉85% of economic growth takes place outside the EU... 👉By 2050, the EU will still account for around 10% of the global economy... 👉… Quiet blood! You don't give up on direct democracy just because a few scaredy-cats are calling for its demise!

RT by @hjbertschi: 🇨🇭Nuclear energy, the most cost-effective technology, plus CO2-free. A self-sufficient solution for Switzerland 🇨🇭, without expensive battery storage.

RT by @hjbertschi: Of course we are giving up direct democracy in the sphere of influence of the 7 agreements! The rules are made by the EU! One can certainly have the discussion about military defense. But now to suddenly claim that the RA2.0 has anything to do with it is unfair! RA2.0 is about 7 agreements on the internal market and not even remotely on defense or security!

R to @hjbertschi: (2/2) While electricity costs of around 8.5 cents per KWh can be expected for nuclear power from a new nuclear power plant, the cost for solar power from roof systems is 21 cents/KWh. If you take into account the necessary expansion of the network, network stability and storage, these costs can double or more. Walter Rüegg, NZZ #Nuclear power #Nuclear power plants #NPP #Solar power #Electricity costs #Security of supply #Blackout initiative

RT by @hjbertschi: I would like to use the protocol on food safety (common food safety area) to show you once again how blatantly these contracts undermine our #sovereignty and #self-determination: Switzerland must accept a massive #sovereignty loss in so-called tertiary legal acts (implementing acts and delegated acts of the EU Commission). Switzerland is contractually obliged to apply such new EU law #temporarily in Switzerland from the day of its application in the EU, even before the Joint Committee has even taken the formal decision to adopt it. Switzerland therefore applies foreign law before its own domestic approval procedures have been completed. If Switzerland exceptionally fails to implement this immediate application, the EU may immediately take protective measures. The EU Commission is allowed to carry out audits in Switzerland to check whether the Swiss authorities are correctly implementing EU law and whether the national control systems are functioning. With the direct adoption of the EU Control Regulation (Regulation [EU] 2017/625), Switzerland loses the freedom to design its control and fee structures purely according to its own needs. E.g.: For the approval of plant protection products, Switzerland is forced to align its approval fees with the (higher) level of the EU countries in the "central zone". Whether you like the word or not doesn't matter: this is a #submission contract! @KompassVI @kompass_europa @NZZ @nebelspalter @nzz @FuW_News @Handelszeitung @autonomiesuisse

RT by @hjbertschi: Thank you very much Good luck, good luck Great 𝗗𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗺 𝗴𝗮𝗻𝘇𝗲𝗻 𝗖𝗛–𝗘𝗨-𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘁. The complete dossier is now online. I have the electricity agreement Great news - without PR, without political whitewashing. Other information: • What the agreement really regulates (market, networks, platforms) • Where Switzerland adopts EU law • Which statements in public discourse are not covered by the contract • Where opportunities lie – and where the risks for Switzerland begin The difference is particularly crucial when it comes to the electricity agreement: Integration sounds technical - but it has a direct impact on sovereignty, prices and control. Good luck, good luck 𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗸𝗼𝗺𝗹 𝘁𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗮̈𝗰𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗯𝗲𝗱𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘁, 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝘂 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗴 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗲𝗻 – 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗹𝗮𝗴𝘇𝗲𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗻. 👉 The complete dossier on the electricity agreement is now on my website. 👉 What is your assessment: necessary integration or too big a step? #PackageCHEU #Framework Agreement #Loss of Sovereignty #Electricity Market

RT by @hjbertschi: Have you noticed how the federal government and the EU turbos suddenly adjust their argument on RA2.0? Previously it was: access to the internal market, free movement of people and prosperity, but now security is suddenly the #1 issue! The propaganda video on the EDA website mentions “security” as the main argument for RA2.0. In yesterday's (manipulative) article in the Tagesschau, Bernd Lange, Chairman of the EU Parliament's Trade Committee, emphasized that RA2.0 helps in “uncertain times”. The EU turbos in parliament are now starting to incorporate “security” as an argument into their arguments. Represented by Marianne Binder. They want to take advantage of the current world situation and play on the keyboard of fear in order to convince the people. But of course that just shows how desperate the EU turbos are. Your original arguments do not stand up to scrutiny. 👉 Trading works without RA2.0. We don't have to risk our direct democracy to trade with the EU. 👉 PFZ: 1) The PFZ remains in place. 2) If it is terminated (unlikely), Switzerland can easily ensure that it continues to allow the required skilled workers into the country in a much more targeted manner. 3) Without UBRL, let's save ourselves massive additional immigration and high costs for social assistance. 👉 Prosperity: After an analysis by Swiss Economics of the study commissioned by the federal government from Ecoplan showed that it contains serious errors, the argument is also gone. “The influence of Bilateral I on the income of the Swiss resident population is practically negligible.” @kompass_europa @autonomiesuisse @nebelspalter @FuW_News @Handelszeitung @Weltwoche @nzz

RT by @hjbertschi: Does the BR and the EU turbos @SRF actually have to pay advertising fees for these #commercials for RA2.0 like just in the Tagesschau (@srfnews)?

RT von @hjbertschi: über @hjbertschi

RT by @hjbertschi: This constantly repetitive, preventive delivery to Brussels alone is the best evidence against the EU Treaty.

RT von @hjbertschi: Kongress Komassinitiative in Dübendorf, am 27.05.2026 https://eventfrog.ch/de/p/politik-gemeinde/politik/kompass-kongress-2026-7434171420077201064.html

RT von @hjbertschi: Kongress Kompassinitiative 27.05.2026 Link teilen + weiterleiten 😃 ❤️🇨🇭 https://eventfrog.ch/de/p/politik-gemeinde/politik/kompass-kongress-2026-7434171420077201064.html

RT by @hjbertschi: It's anticipatory obedience....

RT by @hjbertschi: 𝗡𝗥 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘇 𝗚𝗿ü𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗿𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗖 𝗴𝗲𝘇𝘄𝘂𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗻. The FDFA now confirms receipt of the submission. Because of the interpellation by NR Franz Grüter, the Federal Council is obliged to respond according to Art. 125 ParlG. This means that the actual question of power in the EU package is officially at the Federal Council level: Wow 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗵𝘁𝘇𝗲𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴 – 𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗻, 𝘄𝗲𝗻𝗻 𝗘𝗨-𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗵𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘄𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗹𝘂𝗻𝗴, 𝗩𝗼𝗹𝗹𝘇𝘂𝗴 Great value for money 𝘄𝗶𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗻? Because that's exactly where the neuralgic point lies: Direct democracy loses its substance if the people and classes are only allowed to intervene after the practical political and administrative effect has already occurred. 𝗝𝗲𝘁𝘇𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗕𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗿𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘇𝘂 Great. Anyone who wants to follow this debate closely will find an overview of the sensitive points of the EU package here. #PackageCHEU #Framework Agreement #Loss of Sovereignty @FGrueter @mcpolitik @hans_denkt @hjbertschi @BobgonzaleBob @VoGunte https://x.com/mcpolitik @zauberberg188

Why doesn't the @EDA_DFAE defend the rights of a Swiss citizen who is being sanctioned and deprived of all rights by the #EU Commission with questionable arguments? Does the EDA want to court Brussels? The same people will automatically wave through EU law in the future. No to harmful #EU treaty package!

RT von @hjbertschi: Das ist interessant. Polen, Ungarn und Tschechien gelten als sehr sicher, während für Frankreich, Schweden, Deutschland, Italien, Spanien, Belgien und das Vereinigte Königreich erhöhte Vorsicht geboten ist. Was meint ihr, Leute? Was ist dort anders als in Mitteleuropa?

RT by @hjbertschi: Suisse-UE – Peter Sloterdijk : « L'exception suisse doit être préservée » (c'est toujours mieux quand c'est un Allemand qui le dit) NZZ, March 29, 2026 - Entretien with the German philosopher, former rector of the University of Karlsruhe (extraits traduits). « La démocratie directe Suisse is a épine dans le pied des démocraties représentatives. A mon avis, elle doit le rester. (…) « Le fait que le bien commun et l'intérêt personnel tendent à coïncider est un principe fundamental de la Confédération Suisse, une clause inscrite dans sa constitution non écrite. « Lorsque les citoyens suisses sont appealés aux urnes, ils continuent de travailler à la construction de leur État, à un « chantier permanent ». « Beaucoup de choses sont permises, mais une chose ne l'est pas : interrompre ce processus d'édification et de développement de la société. (…) « Dans la plupart des other pays, la démocratie directe se limite généralement à des éléments municipaux. (…) « L'anomalie Suisse tient d'abord au fait que la démocratie directe se poursuit aux ebenex(…) cantonal et federal, de manière systématique. « Presque partout ailleurs, les politiciens craignent le people ; on comprend pourquoi. La Suisse, apparemment, is not an important product of the political class that belongs to the people… (…) « La Suisse est, en un sens, une révolution permanente qui se déroule au quotidien, et pacifiquement. (…) « Sans the exception of Switzerland, tout le champ de la théorie et de la pratique politiques en Europe serait considérablement appauvri. « L'UE s'enfoncerait encore davantage dans le cynisme quotidien de sa mascarade démocratique et pourrait réciter son mantra avec une justification encore plus convaincante : « Il n'y a pas d'alternative.» Mais il y en a une. The Swiss exception is now available. (…) « Les dirigeants européens les plus avisés le reconnaissant. Pourtant, pour la même raison, ils craignent la Confédération Suisse : elle démontre avec une clarté implacable que les choses peuvent être différentes. The Swiss exception is now available. « Vraisemblablement, l'UE et la Suisse ne s'entendront jamais sur la definition de la sovereignty. Et tant ce désaccord persistera, il serait fatal d'intégrer la Suisse à l'approche utopique de l'UE. The Swiss essence is served in the European bouillon. « Je ne parle pas en partisan d'un système en particulier, mais en analyste. Car voyez-vous: l'érosion intellectual engdrée par un climat de « démocratie de façade » constitutes a danger réel qui menace l'Europe de l'intérieur. (…) « L’addiction à la soumission ne figure pas parmi les pathologies Suisses. (…) « Les Suisses sont les souls Européens pour qui le concept de souveraineté populaire n'est pas resté a vaine formule. » (…) @autonomiesuisse @kompassVI https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/buecher/peter-sloterdijk-es-waere-fatal-die-schweiz-in-den-eu-suppentopf-zu-werfen-ld.1930303

RT by @hjbertschi: Hello @simonmichel, look what's happening with the @fdp_bern? They have the EU turbos to thank for that! We will see the same thing happen next year at the national level. @SVPch with +3%, @FDP_Liberalen with -1-2%, Dear party leadership (@bmuehlemann, @jonasprojer, #SVS), if you want to avert the disaster, the parliamentary group must unite in favor of twice the majority. #markmywords

RT by @hjbertschi: The vote on the integration treaty 🇨🇭 — 🇪🇺 is without a doubt the most important vote in Switzerland since 1874. Switzerland would be unhinged economically, politically, legally and socially. And in the opinion of the majority of the Federal Council and Parliament, this vote should take place without a majority of the states. Not because it is factually correct, but because it would be more of an assumption. This is a shameful attitude.

RT by @hjbertschi: The FDP Oberaargau won one seat in the Bern elections - it campaigned with @JavierMileiDE - and with the slogan "Bern chooses freedom". Must be a pointer for the @FDP_Liberals.

R to @hjbertschi: "The #EU would get even deeper into the everyday #cynicism of its #democracy-as-if games, and with even better reasons it could recite its mantra: There is no alternative. But it exists. You have to preserve the #Swiss #exception." Peter Sloterdijk, philosopher 👉We are not allowed to introduce #democracy_as_if_games in Switzerland like in #Brussels - that's why we say no to the #EU_treaty package with dynamic EU law adoption and ECJ monopoly on interpretation. @autonomiesuisse https://lnkd.in/ecxeKWHs A very worth reading NZZ interview by René Scheu, March 28, 2026, p. 44/45

Peter Sloterdijk: “It would be fatal to throw Switzerland into the EU soup pot” “Without the #Swiss exception, the entire area of political theory and practice in #Europe would be very impoverished.” Peter Sloterdijk, German philosopher Must-read, release link👇👇 https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/buecher/peter-sloterdijk-es-waere-fatal-die-schweiz-in-den-eu-suppentopf-zu-werfen-ld.1930303?gift=S9Wb3t0u

RT by @hjbertschi: Absolutely right! Switzerland's true prosperity is based on our institutional flexibility. Anyone who sacrifices direct democracy for short-term market interests and imports Brussels' inertia endangers our long-term model of success. 🛑🇨🇭

RT by @hjbertschi: Yes, of course, the Swabian comes to Switzerland and wants to explain #directdemocracy to us 🤪 It has become fashionable to mix all functioning countries into the broken EU uniformity. So loser states like Germany no longer stand out as much 🤡 Switzerland remains neutral, sovereign and innovative in the middle of Europe - that's modern!!

RT by @hjbertschi: Switzerland: EU laws? No, we make our own! Listen to the lecture! On YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcast. So that what cannot be left unsaid is said. #Switzerland #EU #Sovereignty #Laws #Politics #Subordination Treaty

RT by @hjbertschi: 🇨🇭 The cantons would be directly affected and restricted by the dynamic adoption of EU law ⚖️ This is precisely why the majority of votes in the vote on the EU framework agreements is absolutely justified 🏛️🗳️

RT by @hjbertschi: It took constitutional lawyer Stefan Schmid for political Bern to realize that the agreement with the EU violated the mass immigration article of the Federal Constitution. Therefore the constitution must be changed. @pmbregy

RT by @hjbertschi: If you don't understand Switzerland, you shouldn't bring this fact to market.

RT by @hjbertschi: 𝗪𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗮̈𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗵𝗿 【 𝗘𝗨-𝗩𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗿𝗮̈𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹, Great value for money Great value 𝗙𝗼̈𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺𝘂𝘀. You have to state things clearly: the majority of estates is not a disruptive factor, but rather a fundamental safeguard for Switzerland. It gives the cantons weight, especially when it comes to fundamental decisions. And that's exactly why the debate is so explosive. When it comes to EU issues, the popular majority is often different from the class majority. So if you want to take the extra booths out of the equation, you don't just lower a hurdle. It changes the political architecture of the decision. The expert hearing in the Council of States showed that even lawyers come to very different conclusions. This means: There is no clean, alternative solution here. In the end, Parliament makes a fundamental political decision. 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀𝘁: The hearing in the Council of States actually ended with a preponderance in favor of the majority. At the same time, the selection of experts shows how political this question has long become. This decision has weight far beyond this dossier. Because if you relativize the federal protection instrument in EU treaties, you create a precedent. 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝘂, 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 Great value How good is it? #PackageCHEU #Framework Agreement #Loss of Sovereignty https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/erste-anhoerung-zum-staendemehr-bei-den-eu-vertraegen-endet-mit-ein-sieg-auf-ansage-ld.1931210

RT by @hjbertschi: The majority of experts are of the opinion that legally there is a need for more estates. & if EU turbos around @simonmichel consider an increase in the number of states to be “unfair”, I expect the #FDP A) no longer appoints members of the Council of States & B) launched a popular initiative to abolish the #estate surplus.

RT by @hjbertschi: The goal is getting closer. Stay tuned.

RT by @hjbertschi: If the Federal Council REFUSES the sovereign to have more states!, then the people have to step outside the door. And…. That's what we do🇨🇭

RT by @hjbertschi: Thank you very much Hans-Jörg, and…. We would still have to pay billions for expanded access to our electricity supply and our resources. 🇨🇭's expression of will would be deleted. D/EU blew up their secure, affordable electricity supply themselves!