SZwanglos – Following Feed

How many scientists are being blackmailed by Epstein & co. to lie to us?

This is correct. The scientoxic establishment was captured by the likes of Epstein & Gates a long time ago. That anyone believes anything coming out of that machine of lies is what is truly astonishing. Do your own scientific research. Do not trust the establishment scientists.

Why both Labour & the Conservatives lost the Gorton & Denton by-election: they are 2 sides of the same "Pedophile Defender UniParty".

Eric Clapton and Jack Bruce of Cream at the Winterland Ballroom in San Francisco, March 1968. Photo by Jim Marshall. These specific shows were legendary, with live recordings from this run eventually making it onto their masterpiece double album Wheels of Fire. What is your favorite track by Cream?

R to @robinmonotti: Global warming saves lives, we need more greenhouse gases not less. Life adapts quicker to heating than to cooling. We need a warmer planet.

FACT CHECK: TRUE ✅

R to @robinmonotti: The Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine, adopted on July 16, 1990, proclaimed Ukraine's intent to become a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs and does not accept or produce nuclear weapons. NATO is not a neutral bloc.

CO2 is GOOD for the environment we need MORE of it not less. This is basic photosynthesis. Oh and increasing CO2 is a result of Oceans warming, CO2 in water gets released as it warms up. Same as fizzy drinks. Basic science. Humans are NOT the cause.

Hold on, didn't they say that the "apolitical" Berlinale is independent of government interference? Turns out it's not! "Tricia Tuttle's position as head of the festival is being called into question by government ministers after an edition overshadowed by political backlash."

R to @robinmonotti: x.com/TheConWom/status/20261…

When the Establishment is not raping children, it is murdering them for profit under cover of "vaccination". The entire system is set up to abuse children. "Vaccination" is a key pillar of the profit extraction from the bodies of children who get loaded up with toxic pharmaceuticals.

R to @robinmonotti: "We agreed THERE IS NO INTENTION TO EXPAND THE NATO SECURITY ZONE FURTHER TO THE EAST. This applies in GENERAL and not only to the German Democratic Republic which we do NOT intend to incorporate [in NATO] " Washington, 1990. Press Conference after meeting of James Baker US Secretary of State & Hans-Dietrich Genscher, Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs and Vice Chancellor of Germany.

R to @robinmonotti: GERMAN UNIFICATION CONDITIONAL TO NO NATO EXPANSION EAST OF WEST GERMANY “We made it clear in the two-plus-four negotiations that we would not take NATO beyond the Elbe stretch [West German border]. We can therefore not offer Poland and the others NATO membership." Jürgen Chrobog represented West Germany at the 2+4 negotiations with East Germany and the four victorious powers of World War II (the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France) concerning the reunification of Germany and its future as a NATO member, and referred to those negotiations in a meeting of the directors of the US, UK, French, and German foreign ministries in Bonn. After the meeting of the political directors of the US, British, French and German foreign ministries in Bonn on 6 March 1991, Chrobog wrote:

“We made it clear in the two-plus-four negotiations that we would not take NATO beyond the Elbe stretch [West German border]. We can therefore not offer Poland and the others NATO membership." Jürgen Chrobog represented West Germany at the 2+4 negotiations with East Germany and the four victorious powers of World War II (the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France) concerning the reunification of Germany and its future as a NATO member, and referred to those negotiations in a meeting of the directors of the US, UK, French, and German foreign ministries in Bonn. After the meeting of the political directors of the US, British, French and German foreign ministries in Bonn on 6 March 1991, Chrobog wrote:

R to @robinmonotti: BAKER TO GORBACHEV: "Would you prefer a united Germany outside of NATO that is independent and has no US forces or would you prefer a united Germany with ties to NATO and assurances that there would be no extension of NATO’s current jurisdiction eastward?” GORBACHEV: "Such an expansion would be “unacceptable” https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

Nothing to see here, all is good. Just keep submitting all your ID documents online, and do NOT question the Digital ID. Be good electric sheeple.

.@EricClapton discussing the origins of 'Fresh Cream' during a 1993 interview.

"NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990. Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner "U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.  The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.” The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO. This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25). The former idea about “closer to the Soviet borders” is written down not in treaties but in multiple memoranda of conversation between the Soviets and the highest-level Western interlocutors (Genscher, Kohl, Baker, Gates, Bush, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Major, Woerner, and others) offering assurances throughout 1990 and into 1991 about protecting Soviet security interests and including the USSR in new European security structures. The two issues were related but not the same. Subsequent analysis sometimes conflated the two and argued that the discussion did not involve all of Europe. The documents published below show clearly that it did. The “Tutzing formula” immediately became the center of a flurry of important diplomatic discussions over the next 10 days in 1990, leading to the crucial February 10, 1990, meeting in Moscow between Kohl and Gorbachev when the West German leader achieved Soviet assent in principle to German unification in NATO, as long as NATO did not expand to the east. The Soviets would need much more time to work with their domestic opinion (and financial aid from the West Germans) before formally signing the deal in September 1990. As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.”

Time for BAFTA members to withhold subscriptions until the board resigns. BAFTA hired out the venue to Palantir & MoD to celebrate their £240M taxpayer-funded surveillance agreement. Palantir shares targeting info with IDF & ICE https://artistsforpalestine.org.uk/2025/09/08/olivia-colman-javier-bardem-mark-ruffalo-among-1300-refusing-collaboration-with-israeli-film-institutions-complicit-in-gaza-genocide/ via @Art4PalestineUK

Explains a lot doesn't it?

Declassified CIA files reveal chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines "A newly released CIA document reveals a chilling blueprint to manipulate minds through covert drugging experiments. The report, added to the CIA's reading room in 2025, details the government's once top-secret Project Artichoke that ran from 1951 to 1956, focusing on behavior control, interrogation techniques and psychological manipulation. The seven-page document, titled 'Special Research for Artichoke,' with an attachment labeled 'Suggested Fields for Special Research Relative Artichoke,' outlines proposals to develop chemicals capable of altering human behavior. It discusses drugs designed for both immediate effects, like truth serums and long-term influence, potentially administered through food, water, alcohol or cigarettes. Researchers also suggested that such substances could be disguised in medical treatments such as vaccinations or injections. Artichoke served as a precursor to the CIA's MKUltra program, which later broadened mind-altering experiments on a larger scale." Stacy Liberatore, Daily Mail

Keir Starmer let off 'paedos' with warning letters "An Express investigation has uncovered shocking revelations about the Prime Minister's past actions at the CPS. "Sir Keir Starmer’s position is “completely untenable” after revelations he oversaw the use of “paedophile Asbos” that allowed suspects to get off with a warning. An Express investigation found documents from his time as Britain’s top prosecutor describing how the Prime Minister was “drafting and agreeing” warning notices with police chiefs that whistleblowers say have been given to suspected child rapists. Maggie Oliver, who exposed the Rochdale grooming gangs scandal, told how had seen fellow officers use the letters to make investigations “go away” and described them as “an Asbo for paedophiles.”

Clearly written by Roger Waters: "Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air You better watch out There may be dogs about I've looked over Jordan, I have seen Things are not what they seem What do you get for pretending the danger's not real? Meek and obedient, you follow the leader Down well trodden corridors, into the valley of steel What a surprise! A look of terminal shock in your eyes Now things are really what they seem No, this is not a bad dream"

MANDELSON ARRESTED Did you know that in 2010 Hannah Rothschild directed a film about Peter Mandelson called "MANDELSON: THE REAL PM?" Yes. Really.

Exactly Robin.

John was "used". BAFTA used John DAvidson.

To recap: the BBC last night cut out an anti-genocide slogan, but then on the same night managed to fail to mute one or more racial slur (nigg**rs), it's almost as if they are deliberately stirring up racial division to distract from P@l€$tin€ themed speeches in the film industry!!! Evil Machiavellians

R to @robinmonotti: It's almost as if they are deliberately stirring up racial division to distract from P@l€$tin€ themed speeches in the culture industry...

Hold on, so they cut "Free P@l€$tin€" but could not mute "nigg**s"? What's going on here exactly?

R to @robinmonotti: x.com/robinmonotti/status/20…

I wonder why Paul Thomas Anderson's objectively cliché film won 6 BAFTAs...

This is the BBC censored speech from British filmmaker Akinola Davies Jr.

BAD WOKE FILM WINS BAFTAS! One Battle After Another is an almost 3 hour long cliché peppered by artificial stereotyped characters based on simplifying tropes from their ethnicities or cultural backgrounds. It is political, just very bad superficial "woke" politics.

"During the BBC‘s TV coverage of the 79th BAFTA Film Awards ceremony, Akinola Davies Jr’s remark of “Free Palestine” was cut from the broadcast of his speech. The My Father’s Shadow director, who won the ‘Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director or Producer’ alongside his brother Wale Davies, ended his emotive acceptance speech by shouting, “Free Palestine”. This was reported in the BBC‘s own online coverage of the event, but notably during the television broadcast of the annual ceremony – that runs roughly 30 minutes behind the actual event – the political remark was seamlessly cut." Far Out magazine

Glad I am not the only one who found One Battle After Another to be an almost 3 hour long cliché peppered by artificial stereotyped characters based on simplifying tropes from their ethnicities or cultural backgrounds. Not surprised BAFTA rewarded it for exactly the same reasons!

Thomas Atlas - “Shackles on Me” (Jimmie Vaughan Cover) - LIVE

BEST FILM OF 2025: BUGONIA BUGONIA takes your average normie viewer for a ride, ultimately asking them to accept that the most outlandish conspiracy theories may even be correct after all... A great tangential take on the actual current depopulation operation in which the oligarchy are not even human, it's funny to see how many don't get the message of the film and think it is just bonkers conspiracy theory instead of a slight alteration of current reality. And Albert Bourla is Emma Stone so a much better watch!