We’ve challenged lockdowns, questioned Covid vaccines, called out MSM narratives, and platformed voices others ignored. For that, we’ve been demonetised and sidelined.
Now TCW (@TheConWom) may not survive past May without your support.
If you value independent journalism, please support us now more than ever.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/my-tcw-week-in-review-treated-as-pariahs/
Freedom can also be lost little by little, by what the Fabians call the doctrine of gradualness. A little more taxation here, a little more government expenditure there, year after year until the people are no longer the masters of the state but its servants.
There are always, it seems, good reasons advanced for the state to have more power. But rarely for the state to divest itself of power.
Each new problem becomes an excuse for more government intervention and less individual responsibility.
Can someone tell me who benefits if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked?
And, should it continue, why the UK would be any way less dependent on US energy imports than it already is?
And who benefits from a higher global oil price, priced in dollars?
Norman Fenton's X account @ProfNFenton has been hacked and X have told him that he is "no longer the owner of the account" and they cannot help further.
Sir;
Your conversation herein is vital.
I've made it MB accessible for -25MB Email exchange, and for -2:20 timeframe sharing on X.
Both of which restrictions stop many sharing truth.
Forgive me, I will share and post,
🙏🏻
The "vote for me" scam remains a major ongoing phishing issue on X as of March 16, 2026. It continues to spread through hacked accounts, leading to widespread takeovers where hackers quickly change the email, phone number, and sometimes the handle. This makes standard recovery very difficult or impossible for many users, as X's process relies heavily on those altered details.
How the "Vote for Me" Scam Operates
Scammers compromise an account (often through earlier phishing, reused passwords from breaches, or credential stuffing). They then use it to send direct messages (DMs) to followers or mutuals. Typical messages include:
- "Hey, quick favor! I’m in the running to co-host a major podcast event with Spotify & Google. It’d mean a lot if you could drop a vote for me!"
- Or similar urgent pleas like "Vote for me in this podcast/influencer contest before it ends today" with a link.
The link (often shortened with X's t[.]co or suspicious domains like .fwh.is, .gt.tc, bestvotees[.]fwh[.]is, or fake voting sites) leads to a phishing page mimicking an X login or voting form. Entering credentials (or sometimes just loading the page) hands over access via stolen passwords, session tokens, or cookies.
Once in control:
- Hackers change the email and phone to ones they own.
- They may add or take over 2FA.
- The account starts auto-sending the same DMs to the new victim's network, turning it into a viral chain (like malware propagation).
- Some pivot to posting crypto promotions, spam, or other scams.
Reports show this has hit everyday users, verified accounts, journalists, coaches, athletes, celebrities, and more throughout early 2026. Victims often wake up to friends warning them or see their own account spamming others. If you get an unauthorized email change notification from verify@x.com early enough, you can sometimes revert it via a provided link, but speed is critical.
Key Hacking and Recovery Challenges on X
- **Fast alterations** — Hackers prioritize changing email/phone/handle to lock out the owner immediately.
- **Recovery barriers** — X's hacked account forms require original contact info for verification. Once changed, appeals often fail or drag on with little response. Many users report repeated submissions with no fix, leading to permanent loss of accounts, content, connections, and features like monetization.
- **No strong fallbacks** — There's limited use of immutable identifiers for proof of ownership, so proving "this was my original account" is tough without access to the updated details.
- **Spread and scale** — The DM-based trust exploitation (from "friends") makes it highly effective and hard to contain. Even cautious users fall for it occasionally due to the social proof.
Plea to Elon Musk and the X Team
@elonmusk and @X: This persistent "vote for me" phishing wave and resulting account takeovers are damaging user trust and causing real harm, people are losing years of history, communities, and income with little recourse. The ease of changing core details (email, phone, handle) lets hackers lock owners out permanently, while recovery remains slow and ineffective via email.
Please implement stronger safeguards urgently:
- Lock the original handle and email used at creation (or allow easy reversion with robust proof).
- Add a permanent, unchangeable account ID number visible to the owner for appeals and public, reference, and recovery verification — something hackers can't touch.
- Improve hacked account reporting with faster manual reviews, better tools for cases where contact info was altered, and proactive detection of mass DM spam patterns.
- Enhance link scanning in DMs to flag/warn about known phishing tactics and domains.
- Provide clearer, quicker paths to reverse unauthorized changes.
These changes would drastically reduce chain-reaction hacks and help restore confidence.
@elonmusk @nikitabier @Safety
Happy with Digital ID? Read this and consider why.
The history of vaccines, and their catastrophic (and intentional) impact on the world cannot be overstated.
It is difficult for the mind to comprehend.
From chronic disease to altered behavior. From creating drug addicts and criminals to destroying human interaction and relationships.
The extent to which immune system and neurological damage touches our lives is nearly beyond comprehension, and is occurring at scale.
And once you see it all... you won't be able to look away.
And the likely outcome of this information is being converted to Christianity.
Because once you know the devil exists...
I just sent a warning to my email newsletter list, most of which joined me because I told the truth about Covid, who may not expect me to oppose the U.S. war machine, too:
"This week I had a handful of people write to tell me they were shocked by my noninterventionist take on the situation in Iran. They say they liked what I had to say on Covid, but they're confused about this.
"I don't know how it could have shocked them; I've done nothing but condemn the permanent regime in Washington, the one that doesn't go away no matter who gets elected, and I've made clear that I don't believe a word it says. I cannot imagine still, at this late stage, being in thrall to it, no matter how scary one thinks the Iranian regime is.
"I don't just buy what the so-called public health establishment tells me about anything, no matter how scary that thing may seem to me. They have not earned that trust. (That's the understatement of the century right there.)
"If we can see through the Covid nonsense, we should certainly be able to see through this fiasco, and not be distracted by the loathsome Mark Levin and Sean Hannity trying to tell you that "Iran has been at war with us for 47 years," a whopper even for those two geniuses.
"There are awful regimes around the world, no doubt, but my primary concern has to be the one that rules over me, and the fact is, the American foreign-policy apparatus cannot tell the truth to save its life.
"After 25 years of what we call the 'War on Terror,' it really should have become obvious that these adventures are worse than useless -- much, much worse than useless. Read Scott Horton's book Enough Already: Time to End the War on Terrorism. Tall tales about liberating oppressed peoples are for naive fools, and people on the right are supposed to be anything but that.
"This is not a 'liberal' point of view, I shouldn't have to point out. It is in fact the most based, right-wing view there is.
"I promise you're not being a 'liberal' to oppose this very worst of government programs. As I show in my book 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask, it is an absurd myth that American liberals have opposed war. They have been perfectly happy with virtually all American wars since 1898. They soured on Vietnam after they contributed so much to it, but that's about it.
"Back in 2011, I was about to speak to a group in Los Angeles some unknown fraction of which consisted of big boosters of American military adventures. I could have gotten away with giving a predictable anti-Obama speech and left it at that. I knew I would have been cheered.
"But I wanted to tell them that if they're really going to be opponents of the regime, they have to understand that the foreign-policy side of it is bad, too. It isn't that Obamacare and milk subsidies are wrong, but the Pentagon is awesome. The entire regime is deeply, deeply sick, and it exploits people's patriotic instincts to get them to go along with things they'd never approve otherwise.
"For a moment I considered not bringing it up. I could just give that rah-rah speech that I knew they'd love.
"Then I thought: what kind of person would that make me? I won't tell the truth as I see it because I'm afraid a crowd won't like me?
"I decided I couldn't be like that in my public speaking (and I won't be like that in this newsletter, either, of course).
"So I told them: I used to have the same opinions you do. And then I couldn't take it anymore. It was Pat Buchanan who objected most loudly on humanitarian grounds to -- for example -- the inhuman sanctions on Iraq, among other things. You're going to tell me Pat Buchanan is a 'liberal'? Come on.
"I told them: if it were the Soviet Union doing things like that, and making the same excuses that the execrable U.S. foreign-policy establishment is making, we would laugh. We would also be horrified.
"I said: are you guys the same people who would lecture me about "moral relativism," and yet let moral enormities pass because they're committed by your government? Why are you so eager to make excuses for your government, anyway? If you don't pay your taxes, or you don't follow some dumb regulation, I promise they won't show you the same courtesy.
"I promise I'm not attacking you personally when I accuse our government of doing terrible things. Didn't we all agree Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney were terrible people, after all? Why are we getting squeamish about calling them evil?
"I told them: you are better than this. You are letting the awful regime that rules us turn you into something you should not want to be.
"This is not left-wing or right-wing; it is a simple matter of basic humanity.
"Well, that wasn't what they expected to hear.
"But guess what: I got a thunderous standing ovation. (It's still up on YouTube.)
"They knew I hadn't just told them what they wanted to hear. I had told them what they needed to hear. Instead of just throwing out red meat and playing to the crowd, I spoke to them heart to heart and told them serious things they'd never heard before.
"The ovation said it all.
"Covid reminded us that at heart we are ruled by sociopaths who care more about power than they do about our well-being.
"I am telling you, the same kind of people make the foreign policy. They do not magically transform into saints. I know we want to make an exception in that area, because our uncle is in the military or we like to wave the flag, but we need to face the truth like adults.
"So yes, you are going to hear me say things that will shock you if you came to your philosophy through Sean Hannity or Mark Levin or Ben Shapiro. So prepare yourself accordingly, or if you must, click the unsubscribe button at the bottom.
"But with the densely populated city of Tehran, with nearly 10 million inhabitants, now under a bombing attack, if what you're looking for is rah-rah pro-government propaganda, you will be disappointed, just as you would have been disappointed if you expected me to defend Anthony Fauci.
"The two phenomena are cut from the same cloth."
R to @MartinNeil9: Article here -
https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/volcanoes-black-death
What they aren't telling you about the Black Death:
https://youtu.be/8q4my9Zi5d8?si=4xvIKfP1b1zmOzPe
Volcanic eruption causes failed harvests and collapse of trade.
Were deaths misattributed to disease as sole cause rather than global malnutrition and starvation?
What may well be a very unpopular opinion...
Putting it mildly; compliance with masks, mandates, and the jab often reveals a tendency toward obedience over courage - qualities that make it difficult for such individuals to lead humanity where it needs to go.
Think about it. Compliance wasn’t just acquiescence - it was eagerness. Most of those who followed orders also joined in the ostracism of those who didn’t. Mocking, shaming, wishing harm, denying medical care… all under the banner of "I didn’t know better."
Well, people 'didn’t know.' Fine. But if you didn’t know, the only ethical response was silence. Not ridicule. Not hate. Not complicity in fear.
It says everything about a person who 1) Complied and 2) Shamed and hated others for not complying and 3) Want to bury the truth, the past and their behaviour.
And now, years later, they defend others who 'didn’t know.' They defend their complicity and that of others now in the running for positions of power.
But the truth is, the ones who did know are no longer in doubt. Still, no reckoning. The record remains unbalanced...
Though history remembers, even if people wish to erase it.
But no, these people will not lead us out of crises, a broken system, or the encroaching nightmare of a digital gulag and neo-feudalism. They cannot. Their default is obedience, not courage. Their instinct is conformity, not vision.
The ones who refused, the ones who questioned, the ones who resisted - that is where true leadership lies. But they tend not to step forward for 'elections.' Why? Because they actually care about humanity and understand the system is broken. They’re not here for power. They’re here for truth.
And that terrifies the compliant.
I am all for unity. I have spent six years dedicated to it. I believe in standing together. But what I cannot stand is that the majority of those who once complied seem desperate erase the past, deny the truth, and rewrite history.
If there is to be real unity, it has to be built on honesty. On truth. Not excuses. Not denial.
Yes, what happened was the most costly propaganda campaign in human history... worldwide. But stop pretending that everyone was fooled. We weren’t. At a minimum; 20% of the global population saw through it - who resisted, remained unjabbed or questioned the messaging in some form...
The desperation to bury the truth, to act as if it’s irrelevant, is more than a mistake. It’s dangerous. Because this history - this blueprint - is exactly what shapes our future.
To know where we are going, we must first be honest about where we have been. Anything less is just pretending.
So yes... I’m done with pandering. The world does not need those - whose instinct is to blindly follow and cheerlead tyranny - in positions of power. It needs those who will stand, even when the cost is everything.
Hopeless? Maybe. But ignoring this truth only guarantees more of the same.
Just my opinion, anyway.
Two London Protests in May 2021 - during lockdown measures, covid jab rollout and mandates - prior to being 'granted freedom' in July 2021, both attended by hundreds of thousands of people.
I need to say this again; unapologetically, and without dilution. A slightly emotional moment here, anyone who lived it will understand... others just want to forget.
To the people who stood up in 2020 and kept standing when it would have been safer, easier and more convenient to acquiesce - you matter more than history will ever properly record. This one's for you, the un-'vaccinated,' the early freedom fighters.
Anyone who 'woke up' and spoke up in 2022 or later will never understand what it was like. They cannot. There has been nothing - not before, not since - that compares to the psychological warfare, the social exile, the professional destruction, the coordinated humiliation of those years. It was singular. It was relentless. It was designed to break people.
And still, you stood.
You were mocked as irrational. Painted as dangerous. Deplatformed. Censored. 'Fact-checked.' Threatened. Arrested. Some of you were physically assaulted. Some lost careers, friends, reputations, family. The hostility didn’t just come from institutions, it came from neighbours, colleagues, strangers in the street. From the self-proclaimed 'compassionate.' From the enforcers of 'safety.' From police who forgot restraint. From citizens who forgot humanity.
I know. Because I was there. I was arrested - sometimes violently - beaten, charged and convicted. Multiple times. Arrested as a terrorist and placed on a watch-list as a 'prolific anti-vaxxer.'
They tried to outlaw your speech - literally. They tried to erase your questions. They wanted silence... total, obedient silence.
And you refused.
History has a pattern: the people who are first to speak are always punished hardest. It is only later - when the dust settles and the narrative softens - that others cautiously admit what those early dissenters endured.
But those of us who were there know.
We know the cost.
We know the fear.
We know how alone it felt.
And we also know this: without those stubborn, 'crazy,' humanitarian, brave souls who refused to comply, who tried to inform others - the damage would have been worse. The injuries. The deaths.
You were not reckless. You were resolute. You were not selfish. You were principled.
You were not insane. You were early.
And whether the world acknowledges it or not; lives were saved because you would not be intimidated or coerced into silence.
That kind of courage doesn’t disappear just because the headlines move on.
It remains.
And it matters.
Still.
If you survived that.
If you did not acquiesce.
If you kept fighting...
I know I’ll see you soon.
Because that time was not just a test of compliance for the masses, it was a test of endurance.
And you passed.
Now, get ready... once again. We warned about what's looming, too. And we cannot afford to be 'vindicated' in the same way again. We must stop it in its tracks.
But this time, the army is larger.
The truth has spread farther.
The awareness is greater.
And our strength - tested, forged, unyielding - stands truly fucking steadfast.
Thanks to @OracleFilmsUK for making sure history - and the truth - was captured and preserved.
Indeed, @mtaibbi. The @thetimes operated a smear campaign against academics & independent journalists researching the Syria chemical weapons issue. @Tracking_Power @Tim_Hayward_ @VanessaBeeley @2ndNewMoon
Tegnell is the "dissident" annointed to keep the sceptical happy; his belief in human immunity evaporated with the vaccines.
Sweden was essentially "on message", offering no challenge to the core narrative; the need for “pandemic preparedness” lives on.
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/what-exactly-was-sweden-so-right
https://youtu.be/MiTJDoFKf1I 'There was no pandemic' - @MartinNeil9 @CraigHouston_
A timeless classic. Because it's true.
Well meaning statement. But unfortunately it repeats same catastrophic flaw of the Great Barrington Declaration. That’s why I’m proud I never signed it. Elderly & disabled were least deserving of having their civil liberties removed.
I was wrong about Epstein. I thought he was merely working with intelligence agencies in a honeypot blackmail operation while coordinating a global human trafficking and pedophilia ring that penetrated deep into elite circles. What I didn’t realize was that he was a lynchpin figure in the global shadow government, a key power-broker. We must make sure this scandal is not contained.
“Ted, would you like to pretend to be in a shadow cabinet with me?”
For Restore Britain or Advance UK to succeed they need to defeat the financial industrial complex, which is the absolute root cause of the slow decay of the UK and who are planning our collapse.
Stop the parasites based abroad running the UK as a colony.
https://x.com/i/status/2013698932644196401
In light of the Epstein revelations, which the indefatigable @_whitneywebb has reported on for years, it should come as no surprise that powerful elites are capable of crimes like 9/11 and COVID-19. https://ic911.org/journal/articles/a-plausibility-probe-of-9-11-and-covid-19-as-structural-deep-events/
This is intentional and designed to force millionaires to leave the country. Here's why it's happening:
When the enemy knows they're losing control of the host country and expulsion is on the table, they begin to liquidate the host nation. This is happening in the UK and the NL.
Our enemy's single biggest priority becomes forcing capital out of the host country so it can be scattered and absorbed into countries where they themselves may flee too.
The scattered millionaires of the UK and NL will be able to do business in Dubai, the USA, etc.
But if they get kicked out and the local millionaire aristocracy stays...they lose access to all that money.
Additional bonus: this tears apart the upper class and hamstrings their ability to rule, causing chaos. The enemy can claim victimhood and flee, blaming the nationalists for the collapse and decapitalization.
Here’s what I’ve learned over the years about sequencing and genomes:
1. No viral genome has ever been sequenced directly from a purified sample containing only the target virus. Patient samples always contain a mix of human, bacterial, and other genetic material, and total RNA is extracted from all of it together.
2. No viral genome has ever been read in one continuous physical read from start to end - not even with long-read sequencing, although technical feasible, and not even with Sanger sequencing (considered the gold standard). Every published genome is stitched together from overlapping fragments.
3. Published viral genomes are computational assemblies, not direct readouts. Software algorithms take millions of short fragments (~150 bases) of mixed origin and attempt to stitch them into a candidate sequence. The output is a statistical best guess - the algorithms cannot guarantee it corresponds to any single real biological entity.
4. The first published version of the SARS-CoV-2 genome actually contained confirmed human DNA (matching the "human genome" model) at the start and end - confirmed by Edward Holmes, a co-author - in writing. It was quietly removed in later versions.
5. There is no independent verification loop. Every subsequent study that "confirms" a viral genome uses primers and alignment references derived from the original computationally assembled sequence. If the original is wrong, every downstream confirmation inherits that error.
6. Both the US CDC and Germany's RKI have formally confirmed that they do not isolate viral genetic material from other genetic material before sequencing, and neither possesses a dataset where the complete genome was independently reconstructed from scratch.
7. The bottom line: what they call a "viral genome" is a computer model built from fragments of unknown origin, not a molecule that was physically observed or read end-to-end.
Here is the speech I gave at the @_AdvanceUK conference
The @Telegraph is plagiarising my journalism without accreditation. @j_a_warrington and @matthfield should know better than to steal a man's work.
The German countess who advised the NHS and called Epstein ‘Mr Wonderful’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/02/08/german-countess-built-a-20-year-friendship-epstein/
It is crucial to state clearly that David Cartland has not committed a crime, nor has he been convicted of one.
When I was a school headmaster, I regularly reviewed DBS certificates for staff. Some individuals had historic criminal convictions, including custodial sentences, for past mistakes entirely unrelated to children. Even then, this did not automatically prevent them from working with children.
What we are witnessing in the case of Cartland is something far more disturbing. An inversion of values by the state. A man who sought to safeguard children from harm, acting in what he believed to be his legal and moral duty as a doctor, has been punished and labelled a safeguarding risk.
Meanwhile, those who inflict harm, particularly within the so called higher echelons of power, are routinely shielded from scrutiny, accountability, and consequence.
This is laughable. Apparently our governments spend billions trying, and failing, to engineer viruses but a Chinese guy can do it in his house (with lodgers present).
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15524491/chinese-biolab-Las-Vegas-california.html
PCR tests not used because the stickers on the vials are 100% confirmatory.
We’re expected to believe Epstein single-handedly managed a decades-long "Satanic agenda" across the West while essentially treating the Caribbean like his personal backyard.
The "solitary man" narrative isn't just a stretch; it's a structural failure of common sense.
My Farewell to Medical Ethics.
We are going down a dangerous path and need to acknowledge that and return.
@ClareCraigPath
By @lizhodgkinson today 👇
Dear Rod Liddle, I have news for you.
We ‘anti-vaxxers’ did not theorise that the vaccines were a commie plot. Nor did we theorise at all. By contrast, everything we said and wrote was based on close research from doctors and others who were monitoring these new, experimental substances and their often adverse effects on the human body.
We listened to such experts as Professor Angus Dalgleish and Peter McCullough.
We read the works of Dr Suzanne Humphries and Aaron Siri, who had researched the history of vaccines from their earliest days to the present. We noted the statistics pointing out that many once-feared infectious diseases were coming down fast long before any vaccines were developed. I wonder whether Rod Liddle has informed himself of any of this or read any of the books?
On present showing, it seems unlikely.
We heard the story of David Cartland, a GP who initially promoted the vaccines and later came to take the view that pharmaceutical companies were promoting experimental substances that were unsafe. He advised his patients not to take them and as a result was struck off the medical register, no longer allowed to practise. We listened to Dr Aseem Malhotra, who condemned the covid vaccines as poison shots and was castigated for disseminating ‘misinformation’.
These commentators who spoke out against the vaccines had nothing to gain. By contrast, they had everything to lose. Yet those manufacturing, promoting or administering the jabs had everything to gain. In 2024, Dr Albert Bourla, head of Pfizer, received a total salary package of $24.6million. I doubt that any of those speaking out bravely against the vaccines received even a thousandth of that kind of reward.
Rather, many were left without any income at all.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-ignorance-behind-rod-liddles-sneer-at-anti-vaxxers/
NEW @GBNEWS: “I am your karma” - Rotherham survivor powerfully confronts her abusers in courtroom statement ahead of sentencing
https://www.gbnews.com/news/rotherham-survivor-powerfully-confronts-abusers-court
New Zealand is about to have a month long lockdown despite the fact it has zero deaths.
Proactivity is the only way to get ahead of this virus.
I’m sure their figures will reflect this positive action. Well done!