Another exclusive from @MaryanneDemasi
This time the #plasmidgate cover up at ACIP that required the full force of pharma through its proxy the @AmerAcadPeds to stop this information being presented to public in an official forum.
Why are they so desperate to stop it?
R to @MaryanneDemasi: .@KUPERWASSERLAB lays out a series of unresolved questions — the kinds of questions ACIP meetings are meant to probe. Instead, the meeting was cancelled—and the scrutiny never happened.
LINK: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-presentation-acip-never-heard
@MaryBowdenMD @NVICLoeDown
🛑 The presentation ACIP never heard🛑
Here is an exclusive look at the briefing slides by @KUPERWASSERLAB that were never presented to ACIP—and have not been made public until now.
LINK below 👇👇
@jeffreytucker @RetsefL @KMilhoanMDPhD @React19org @BrianneDressen @shdegaray73
@NIHDirector_Jay @SecKennedy
It took the @CDCgov several months to update its vaccine information statements based on ACIP recommendations—and it still hasn’t—but managed to update its website within 5 minutes of this week’s ruling overturning those same recommendations.
CDC has taken down ACIP recommendations from the Sept 18-19, 2025 and Dec 4-5, 2025 meetings where COVID and Hep B shots in babies were moved from "recommended" to "shared clinical decision making."
Additionally, the recommendation that MMRV shots be separated to MMR + V in children under 4 is now gone.
This is a naked power play by Pharma via AAP and an activist judge to neutralize @SecKennedy and restore the full childhood vaccine schedule and the multi billions of dollars it generates. HHS must appeal and reverse this tyrannical decision, with strong presidential backing. Unelected judges cannot be allowed to control the executive branch, elected by the people. @POTUS
R to @MaryanneDemasi: “Unless officially announced by us, any assertions about what we are doing next is baseless speculation,” said HHS spokesperson @AndrewNixonHHS
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/acip-thrown-into-turmoil-as-questions
🚨ACIP thrown into turmoil as questions mount over what comes next
A claim that ACIP has been “disbanded” has sparked confusion — with officials dismissing speculation and offering no confirmed path forward.
LINK BELOW 👇👇
@AndrewNixonHHS @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay
Teachers are being coerced into denying biological sex which has a major influence on what they say and what they teach. How did we get here?
@aus4science
https://www.scienceandfreedom.org/articles/biological-truth-must-prevail-in-schools/
It's been a week of turmoil for ACIP with a story that has more twists than an Aussie garden hose. But when the dust settles the injured may FINALLY receive the validation that is so desperately needed.
@MaryanneDemasi @TonyNikolic10 @aus4science @CoVerseAU @drmelissamccann @AMPS_RedUnion
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-new-york-times-corrects-the-record
R to @MaryanneDemasi: The decision to cancel the ACIP meeting may have delayed discussion on vaccine injuries, but the report is now in the public domain.
And the conversation it was meant to inform is no longer confined to closed doors — it is finally being heard.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-new-york-times-corrects-the-record
Finally, one proposed code that will give us a medical footprint:
T50.B25x – Adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines
X= 3 designations: A initial encounter; D subsequent encounter; S sequela
“This judge is substituting his OWN judgment.”
@JonathanTurley criticizes a federal judge for trying to block changes to a vaccine advisory committee.
“He’s essentially saying, ‘I like the old experts better.’ But that’s not a judge’s decision — that’s a policy choice.”
What could possibly be so SCARY about allowing vaccine injured Americans to get help??
Want a strong vaccination program?
Take care of the injuries.
This is the most pro-vaccine thing any agency can do.
BREAKING: Court ruling forces cancellation of ACIP meeting, by @MaryanneDemasi https://open.substack.com/pub/maryannedemasi/p/breaking-court-ruling-forces-cancellation?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
Pharma, via their owned organization- American Academy of Pediatrics and their owned judiciary, are flexing their muscles.
Once again- power and politics trumps health.
If a government cannot even form a committee on vaccination because a judge dislikes who is on it, a country cannot really function. Certainly not as a democracy.
In this case, it appears that large multinational corporations are in charge instead.
So a judge has presumed to decide who is, or is not, qualified to sit on a politically appointed committee? Why bother voting? More lawfare in the US.
🚨BREAKING: Court ruling forces cancellation of ACIP meeting
A federal court has frozen the committee’s appointments and questioned whether its members have the required expertise.
LINK below 👇👇
R to @MaryanneDemasi: As the ruling bluntly observes, once those appointments are stayed, “ACIP as currently constituted cannot meet, for how can a committee meet without nearly the entirety of its membership?”
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-court-ruling-forces-cancellation
The Board of REACT19 regrets to inform our community of the sudden cancellation of this week’s meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at the CDC. The meeting was cancelled following a federal court ruling that blocked recent vaccine policy changes and invalidated the current ACIP advisory panel while legal challenges move forward.
For many in our community, this meeting represented a long-awaited opportunity. After more than five years of waiting, patients and families had prepared impact statements in hopes that the urgent need for clinical recognition, research, and care for those suffering from serious post-vaccination conditions would finally be discussed.
For those living with these conditions, this cancellation is deeply painful. It means more waiting, more uncertainty, and more time without the clinical guidance needed to help physicians recognize, diagnose, and treat patients who have been suffering for years. Our hearts are with every member of this community who had hoped their voice would finally be heard this week.
However, even in this difficult moment, important progress continues.
On March 18, REACT19 will still be part of a historic step forward at the CDC. A proposal for a new ICD-10 diagnostic code related to post-COVID-19 vaccination conditions will be presented, opening a public comment period and moving the medical system closer to formally recognizing these patients.
Diagnostic codes are more than administrative tools. They are a critical foundation for clinical recognition, medical education, research, insurance coverage, and ultimately the development of treatments. Establishing an ICD-10 code would represent an important step toward building the clinical infrastructure needed to care for patients who have too often been left without answers.
While the cancellation of the ACIP meeting is a heartbreaking setback for our community, the work to achieve medical recognition and appropriate care continues. If the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services prevails in its appeal, the ACIP process may resume.
In the meantime, REACT19 remains committed to ensuring that the voices of patients are heard and that progress toward recognition, research, and care does not stop.
To every patient and family who has shared their story and stood with us through years of uncertainty: we see you, we hear you, and we will continue advocating for the care and recognition you deserve.
—
Board of Directors
REACT19
💡When the @nytimes follows your scoop
….but forgets to credit the source.
I wrote to @apoorva_nyc asking if the article could be updated to include appropriate attribution to MD Reports. So far, I have not received a response.
LINK: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/when-the-new-york-times-follows-your
@Jikkyleaks @DrJulieSladden @TonyNikolic10 @JasonStrecker @jeffreytucker
#SupportIndependentJournalists
The injured must be acknowledged!
One of the huge shames of the vaccine high religion is for their proponents to gaslight the injured because it shatters their belief of safe and effective. Its widespead ask any injured person
This is an important read
This article both leaks and summarizes an explosive ACIP report on vaccine injury and what to do about it. https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-leaked-report-to-federal
R to @MaryanneDemasi: At its core, the report is both an admission and a blueprint: an acknowledgment that the safety systems failed to capture complex, persistent harm and a plan to correct it.
The question now is, will the system act — or retreat?
FULL ARTICLE: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-leaked-report-to-federal
@KMilhoanMDPhD @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB
@RWMaloneMD @JosephFraiman @StabellBenn
💥EXCLUSIVE: Internal report to federal vaccine advisers calls for urgent recognition of Covid vaccine injuries.
The document proposes reforms for diagnosing and treating vaccine-injured patients. It now goes before ACIP on March 18–19 — the first real test of whether the proposals move from paper to policy.
LINK 👇
@DschlopesIsBack @TheChiefNerd @newstart_2024 @elonmusk @jeffreytucker @React19org @MAHA_Action @SecKennedy @RobSchneider
@billmaher @rustyrockets
R to @MaryanneDemasi: 💡3 reforms proposed by the Covid-19 vaccine workgroup that advises ACIP.
Full document @ MD Reports:
The Covid debacle has left an enduring scar on the psyche of many countries. A recent US poll “suggests a clear shift in public expectations about transparency, responsibility and the limits of government authority in medical decisions,” writes Dr Maryanne Demasi.
R to @MaryanneDemasi: As evidence accumulates, the conversation is beginning to shift toward acknowledging that vaccine injuries are real and warrant serious scientific investigation.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/is-it-long-covid-or-vaccine-injury
💡Is it long Covid or vaccine injury?
A new study found overlapping symptoms but also key differences — findings that could help doctors better recognise and treat patients reporting Covid-19 vaccine injuries.
LINK below 👇👇
@KMilhoanMDPhD @RetsefL
@weldeiry @MAHA_Action @newstart_2024
Bodily autonomy should be paramount in any society. And must not be influenced by ideologically captured institutions.
The pandemic forced a reckoning over medical consent, by @MaryanneDemasi https://open.substack.com/pub/maryannedemasi/p/the-pandemic-forced-a-reckoning-over?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
R to @MaryanneDemasi: The new US polling data confirm what many citizens already feel: decisions about their bodies cannot be separated from informed consent.
Governments and institutions hoping to rebuild trust will need to recognise that reality.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-pandemic-forced-a-reckoning-over
💥The pandemic forced a reckoning over medical consent
People have not forgotten what happened, and it has changed how many now think about the limits of authority in medicine.
LINK below👇👇
@brownstoneinst @theHFDF
Parents informez-vous 🙏🏼⬇️
🚨 Une nouvelle étude sur le vaccin contre le HPV suscite l’enthousiasme mais les données révèlent des failles importantes
L’étude suédoise @bmj_latest fait état de réductions spectaculaires du cancer du col de l'utérus chez les femmes vaccinées contre le HpV, mais les données de l'étude elles-mêmes racontent une histoire beaucoup moins convaincante.
Il est difficile de comprendre pourquoi @bmj_latest a choisi de publier une étude présentant des limitations méthodologiques aussi évidentes. C’est pourquoi l’analyse suédoise doit être interprétée avec scepticisme.
🇫🇷 https://blog-maryannedemasi-com.translate.goog/p/new-hpv-vaccine-study-sparks-enthusiasm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=wapp&_x_tr_hist=true
R to @MaryanneDemasi: It is difficult to understand why @bmj_latest chose to publish a study with such clear methodological limitations. For that reason, the Swedish analysis should be interpreted with scepticism.
LINK: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/new-hpv-vaccine-study-sparks-enthusiasm
@MaryBowdenMD @DrKatLindley
🚨New HPV vaccine study sparks enthusiasm — but the data reveal major flaws
A new Swedish study in @bmj_latest reports dramatic reductions in cervical cancer among HPV vaccinated women, yet the study’s own data tell a far less convincing story.
STORY LINK below👇👇
@Jikkyleaks @newstart_2024
@liz_churchill10 @Kevin_McKernan @jeffreytucker
The public's loss of trust in physician groups like ACOG & AAP is understandable.
These groups support expanding vaccination while getting paid by the vaccine makers.
Much of the public sees these groups as basically working for Pharma.
@MaryanneDemasi covers it.