R to @MaryanneDemasi: With vaccine injuries set to be raised at the March meeting, ACIP may be the only public body positioned to bring the question of PREP Act liability protection into open view.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/if-the-fda-wont-act-acip-may-have
Eric Rubin chief editor at @NEJM was one of many who contacted me post-injury. I engaged, hoping for a probe into AstraZeneca trial discrepancies.
Hope soon became disappointment: his outreach was to personally inform me NEJM would not investigate any reporting issues, and that “writing about a single patient… in a trial with tens of thousands of participants would not have any effect.”
The scale of attacks on ACIP should come as no surprise to those who would dare to question vaccine safely and efficacy.
A narrative once sold as ‘settled science’ is now being dragged - kicking and screaming - through scrutiny not owned or controlled by pharma.
Will the new look ACIP survive? For the sake of future generations, I hope so.
The stakes are high.
That is a true statement @MaryanneDemasi
R to @MaryanneDemasi: The scale of the attacks on ACIP goes to show how much is riding on the direction of this panel — and the decisions now before it.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/acip-set-to-return-in-march-after
FOIA data from the physician vaccine adverse event reporting system in Israel suggest cardiac injuries in rates as high as 1 in 940 vaccinees, among adolescents during the first 6 weeks of their vaccination campaign in June 2021!
@IsraelMOH has to provide an explanation!
Transparency is not only an ethical obligation but necessary to building & sustaining trust in vaccination programs!
@MaryanneDemasi reports on important work by @YaffaRaz, @YaakovOphir and @david_shuldman who obtained the data via Clalit, the largest health fund is Israel (51% percent of the population), and analyze it!
R to @MaryanneDemasi: Israel volunteered to be the world’s laboratory. But when a significant cardiovascular signal appeared in adolescents, it was neither publicly analysed nor disclosed.
STORY link: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hidden-heart-signal-in-israels
A plea to the @US_FDA :
https://charlottekupewasserphd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-in-vitro-transcription?r=1p4b1i
@VPrasadMDMPH @DrJBhattacharya @NIHDirector_Jay @jeffreytucker @Kevin_McKernan @RetsefL @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @MaryanneDemasi
I introduced the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.
Thank you @chelliepingree, @RepBoebert, @RepNancyMace, @RepRoKhanna for sponsoring.
If we’re Making America Healthy Again, government shouldn't be promoting glyphosate and providing liability immunity for corporations making it.
R to @MaryanneDemasi: The churn of @CDCgov leadership is also causing unrest. If uncertainty persists, the concern will only deepen about whether the public health system has a clear hand on the wheel.
FULL LINK: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/us-health-agencies-are-in-motion
@MaryBowdenMD @DrKatLindley
R to @MaryanneDemasi: Mixed signals:
The @WhiteHouse just signed an executive order facilitating glyphosate production — a move that sits uneasily alongside years of warnings from @SecKennedy, who has long argued that the chemical has poisoned the food supply.
R to @MaryanneDemasi: Over at @US_FDA:
Drama with @moderna_tx's seasonal mRNA flu vax.
The official line is that the change was procedural, but sources say internal disagreement at the highest levels led to a shift in course to “save face.”
Now, FDA's announcement of its "one trial" rule in @NEJM is being interpreted as a weakening of the evidentiary bar at the agency
R to @MaryanneDemasi: More ACIP issues: Recent votes on Hep B & Covid not yet updated in patient Vaccine Info Statements. Technical lag or decisions not fully implemented?
If instability continues—missed meetings, unclear authority—resignations could follow. 🚨
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/cdc-still-misleading-people-with
R to @MaryanneDemasi: ACIP's Feb 25 meeting was set to discuss Covid & mRNA vaccines—but Federal Register notices missed deadlines, now its up in the air.
ACIP's @RobertMaloneMD hinted at big mRNA discussions. Could that be the cause for the delay?
ACIP was already sidelined earlier this year when the childhood immunisation schedule was changed without its input.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/america-rewrites-the-childhood-vaccine?utm_source=publication-search
🧵 Who is steering US health policy?
@SecKennedy @HHSGov
Something unsettling is happening inside America’s health agencies. Policies shifting, meetings in limbo, decisions reversed, leadership rotating—yet it's unclear who's directing it all.
STORY LINK 👇👇
@newstart_2024 @DrEliDavid @uTobian @DowdEdward
Trump's latest affront to MAHA, and a sweetheart favor to the pesticide industry: invoking the Defense Production Act to support the manufacturing of glyphosate. "Ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is thus crucial to the national security and defense..."
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/02/promoting-the-national-defense-by-ensuring-an-adequate-supply-of-elemental-phosphorus-and-glyphosate-based-herbicides/
Yet another "real world data" anomaly.
The data in these studies is curated by vested interest groups, and no you can't see the original.
Just believe us that shingles vaccines prevent dementia. Even if they don't.
R to @MaryanneDemasi: Dementia drugs struggle for impact—could a shingles shot do better? I scrutinise the hype vs. evidence.
FULL STORY: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/can-the-shingles-vaccine-really-reduce
@MaryBowdenMD
💡Can the shingles vaccine really reduce dementia risk?
A growing number of studies suggest shingles vaccination may reduce your risk of dementia. The consistency is intriguing — but the strength, and the limits, of that evidence deserve closer scrutiny.
STORY LINK 👇👇
@newstart_2024 @Jikkyleaks @jeffreytucker
@SecKennedy @DrJBhattacharya @StabellBenn
The Australian professors warned that false confidence in the HPV vaccine may discourage young women from attending cervical screening — the only intervention proven to reduce cervical cancer deaths.
FULL STORY - please sign up 👇👇
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hpv-vaccine-has-been-hailed-a
@eileeniorio @NVICLoeDown @Fiddaman @regardthefrost @DrSuzanneH7
🚩Other red flags🚩Vaccinated women (blue line) were far more likely to attend cervical screening than unvaccinated women (red line). And because screening is well known to be very effective at detecting and removing early cell changes, women who get screened naturally end up with fewer abnormalities. But the Scottish study credited this advantage to the vaccine. In reality, the lower rate of early cervical abnormalities in the vaccinated group may largely reflect the benefits of screening — not the jab itself.
In January 2024, headlines erupted worldwide.
“No cervical cancer cases in HPV-vaccinated women,” declared @BBCNews, hailing a landmark breakthrough from Scotland.
A study in the @JNCI_Now claimed that girls who received the HPV vaccine at age 12 or 13 had not developed a single case of cervical cancer.
Two Australian researchers have reanalysed the raw data used in the Scottish study. Most women in the “zero cases” group were still under 25 when the study on HPV vaccine ended.
But cervical cancer is rarely seen in women under 25 (average age of diagnosis is ~50) - it takes decades to develop after infection. So of course there were no cancer cases in that cohort. These women were simply too young. Vaccine or no vaccine, the outcome was entirely predictable. @DrSuzanneH7
🚨The HPV vaccine
A Scottish study was billed as ‘proof’ the HPV vaccine can wipe out cervical cancer. But a new analysis of the raw data shows it was nothing more than a statistical illusion.
LINK 👇👇
@RetsefL
@MdBreathe
@Jikkyleaks
@newstart_2024