Impf_Info – Following Feed 20 Posts (gefiltert)

Reset
@ProfessorAkston 27.01 01:25
"Across all major cancer-tracking indices - diagnosis rates, treatment expenditures, public and institutional attention, and mortality - a clear and consistent signal is observable... In systems terms, this cancer signal is coherent and persistent..." Using completely different analytical methods with no PFE* we find: ~135K MCoD excess ~115K MCoD excess since wk 14 2021 ~107K UCoD excess No end in sight. *non-PFE estimates are low estimates.
@ProfessorAkston 15.12 05:50
“War is cruelty. There's no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.” ― William Tecumseh Sherman No one is coming to save you. Plan accordingly. @wayofftheres
@ProfessorAkston @jeffreytucker RT von @ProfessorAkston 15.10 17:16
I cannot shake this irony. Five years ago, government shut down society. Today the government itself is shut down, society is open, and the agencies that were most at fault for this outrage are themselves being gutted. Anyone else see the poetry in this?
@ProfessorAkston 13.10 17:54
A handful of us "random dudes on the Internet" identified each other early on in this Unholy Mess. We don't speak in 5th grade, as we recognize that's what got us unto this mess.
@ProfessorAkston @EthicalSkeptic RT von @ProfessorAkston 11.10 13:42
Soteriarchic Complex A Soteriarchic Complex is a coalition of the willful and the self-blind: those who act with deliberate malice, and those who unknowingly advance that same agenda under the banner of virtue. The first group—the consciously manipulative—often draws from occult or esoteric agency that redefine inversion as enlightenment. Destruction, deception, and domination are reframed as paths to illumination. Historically, such actors have learned to infiltrate bureaucratic and scientific institutions, concealing their ideology behind the language of reason, policy, and 'expertise.' They prosper in opaque systems where authority is rarely questioned. The second group—those unaware of the deeper agency—practice what can be called apophasis-hate: a morality based not on what fruit they produce, but on what they oppose. They believe suppression equals righteousness, and mistake the silencing of dissent for moral progress. In systems terms, this becomes a negative-value-chain of virtue signaling—a process that feeds on its own self-approval while eroding the integrity of information and trust. Together, these groups form a dual-phase corruption: Phase I – Ideological Conduction: a nucleus of power or occult intent sets the direction. Phase II – Administrative Resonance: well-meaning but epistemically captured individuals carry that intent forward through procedures and policies that appear virtuous. This structure endures precisely because the second group, believing themselves righteous, protects the first from exposure. The result is a self-sustaining moral inversion—an institution that proclaims to save, while quietly consuming the very good it claims to defend.
@ProfessorAkston @DowdEdward RT von @ProfessorAkston 01.10 17:46
After yesterday’s Trump-Bourla pharma love fest it’s time to recirculate this post from July last year. 👇
@ProfessorAkston @DowdEdward RT von @ProfessorAkston 01.10 03:25
Verbal fellatio.
@ProfessorAkston 14.08 03:02
R to @ProfessorAkston: Methods: the relative index chart shows the abrupt divergence in the relationship between UCoD and MCoD brought into stark relief over the 25 year monthly data corresponding to the moment of The Guidance issued to that effect from the CDC. We leverage this highly correlated (0.985) relationship to impute UCoD cancer deaths corrected for by a long-term model. No PFE paints a lower limit to these estimates.
@ProfessorAkston 14.08 02:58
Using long-standing, highly-correlated relationships between cancer UCoD (died of) and MCoD (died with) we estimate the extend of excess cancer mortality concealed under other ICD codes: MCoD Excess: 123K UCoD Excess: 100K methods and replication of relative index chart in reply
@ProfessorAkston 26.07 17:01
Hey @rustyrockets, 2020 called. Please catch up.
@ProfessorAkston RT von @ProfessorAkston 26.07 16:30
Arrgghhhh...still with the "origins" @WarClandestine, @DNIGabbard? People have been "dying of COVID" forever. That mortality was misattributed to other ILI, or other causes before there was a test. Here we see "unspecified coronavirus mortality" start exactly with GoF.
@ProfessorAkston 19.07 23:52
Hi @combatcarl8, as we look at our estimates of excess cancer mortality across the pooled age-groups (second chart), we are incorporating the negative excess cancer mortality of...say...the 85+ group (first chart) that died early of cancer and other causes, here 33K of negative excess in this 85+ group (first chart). So the excess of 100-120K in the pooled age-groups (second chart) is underestimated by "adding in" the negative excess of some age-groups like the 85+ (first chart) in the pooling process.
@ProfessorAkston 19.07 22:34
Working independently and using different methods, we have two estimates at 100K and 120K excess that bracket the 111K excess estimate from TES. The signal is clear and has been present for years from several analysts Hard to believe they haven't pulled the jabs off the market @SecKennedy...but no...worse...still recommending them: https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html @DowdEdward @MdBreathe
@ProfessorAkston 19.07 22:16
I still find estimating U55 excess cancer mortality to be tricky and model dependent, but there is no denying the signal over the 20 years of prior data. Using two different methods that track each other well, we find ~5.5K excess deaths in that age-group that shows no evidence of abating for several years now. @MdBreathe
@ProfessorAkston 01.07 20:11
If @elonmusk can't fix it that should tell us all something: "they" are going to do what they're going to do. All we can do is prepare.
@ProfessorAkston 27.06 17:07
Looks like someone is getting tired of dealing with her and she still won't STFU. Her picture should be in the @Wikipedia entry for Dunning-Kruger. 🤣 "JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of at- tack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever." "Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to pin down." "We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em- bracing an imperial Judiciary." "JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyz- ing the governing statute involves boring “legalese,”" "JUSTICE JACKSON would do well to heed her own admoni- tion: “[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by law.” Ibid. That goes for judges too." I can't wait for the memes. 🤣 "Number of words spoken by each Supreme Court Justice in the 2024 term, as of November 15." h/t @cremieuxrecueil
@ProfessorAkston @Kevin_McKernan RT von @ProfessorAkston 11.06 21:40
I confess to being concerned that they would rotate this panel with more @SenBillCassidy cronies but I know @RetsefL @MartinKulldorff @RWMaloneMD have all spoken up when data was uncomfortable. The last crew would rubber stamp cyanide if it was called an adjuvant. These may not be your personal favorite picks but you cannot deny it’s a step in the right direction. Call balls and strikes… One strike still on the board is mRNA vaccines being given to the unhealthy.
@ProfessorAkston RT von @ProfessorAkston 09.06 00:46
Non-PFE estimates at ~1.3M, conservative (50% of 52WMA non-PFE excess) baseline adjusted PFE estimate at 1.9M. EUROMOMO is paltered, and the 1.4M estimate is non-PFE and paints a lower bound as well.
@ProfessorAkston 04.06 15:30
No one needed to anything. Old account. Note the date:
@ProfessorAkston RT von @ProfessorAkston 01.06 17:37
The Z-scores are one measure of deviation from trend, giving a sense of "is this deviation within reasonably expected random variation, or is this maybe something else?" We see 10+ years of history from 2009 - 2020 with Z-scores largely centered around zero, but nudging 2 in 2017 - 2018* (a 1 in 20 or so event). And then the Unholy Mess we made with a Z-score peaking at ~10.5...importantly...sustained and elevated post jabs. *several lines of evidence point to "COVID-19" being "COVID-17" or even earlier.