Selling a few items on Facebook Marketplace.
I can’t get over the number of people who express interest and agree to collect who then don’t confirm, turn up or respond to follow up messages.
When did decency go out of the window?
I would add:
Many problems are caused by a failure to understand that far-reaching interference with complex systems (economic, biological, geophysical) always leads to unintended and unpredictable adverse effects which are worse than the problems they are trying to solve.
One of the world's greatest useful idiots, Jonathan Freedland, is suddenly shocked to discover that all the anti-Bibi and anti-Israeli policy in Gaza protesters that he has so vociferously cheered on have in reality been nothing but your garden variety Jew haters all along. SMH
An interesting fact about the Graham Linehan @Glinner appeal is that the right Mr Linehan exercised - an automatic right to appeal a summary conviction via a full rehearing in the Crown Court - would no longer exist under David Lammy’s proposed reforms.
“If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.”
— @JMilei
Who’d have thought it. Another pathway targeted by Big Pharma, exciting “game-changing” trials…then a damp squib in the field.
Alzheimer’s ‘wonder drugs’ do not work https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/be962f0c141be07e
The Module 4 report is published at noon today. Today we read it. Tomorrow we will start to comment.
In the meantime, remember that @PVI_2024 is just one of many. There are thousands of healthcare professionals and academics in the UK — and many tens of thousands worldwide — who challenged the prevailing narrative by speaking out against the COVID vaccines, raising concerns about safety data, regulatory failures, the ethics of mandates, short- & long-term harms, and excess deaths.
Many of these doctors, scientists, and academics did so at great personal cost, sacrificing promising careers, professional reputations, and financial stability simply to fulfil what they saw as their ethical duty: voicing well-evidenced concerns.
True progress in medicine has always required the courage to question consensus, the humility to listen to dissenting voices, and the integrity to weigh all evidence.
If, as we suspect, the Module 4 report simply perpetuates the narrative and ignores contrary evidence, then today is a dark day for public confidence in healthcare in the UK.
PVI_2024 Witness Statements to the Inquiry : https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/statements/
Video clips covering that evidence here : https://www.youtube.com/@pvi_2024
@covidinquiryuk @mhragovuk @DHSCgovuk @PSCommissioner
@_aussie17 @1MikeFairclough @A1an_M @AaronKheriatyMD @Abridgen @ake2306 @alanvibe @ashTFE @bell00david @beverleyturner @carlheneghan @CarolinePover @CartlandDavid @ChildrensHD @ClareCraigPath @danastingregory @danny__kruger @danwootton @DebiEvansMatron @DocAhmadMalik @JuliaHB1 @Docs4PatientsUK @DrAseemMalhotra @DrBuckland @DrJBhattacharya @DrJohnB2 @Drs4CovidEthics @DrTeckKhong @EpochTimes @EstherMcVey1 @FreeWCH @GarySidley @GBNews @hicksyalex @Honest_Midwife @ianmcdermottLSO @JabinjuriesGL @JAHockett76
Dear Woke Right Groypers,
You learned what it’s like to be scapegoated during Covid. You were treated as “dirty Jews,” responsible for all the astronomically absurd claims of harm during the “pandemic.” But you were not in fact culpable! And, moreover, those claims of harm were fiction!
Yet, you learned nothing from the experience. Now you hoist piles of charges against Jews, each more ridiculous than the last, and many outright fictions (“gEnOciDe!”). Israelis fight shoulder to shoulder with the U.S., helping us secure our interests, and you loudly side with the Islamic Republic, our joint enemy.
You have become exactly what you claimed to hate during Covid. You are driven by one principle: rather than minimize the spread, it’s maximize the harm to Israel or the Jews (and, yes, it’s actually the Jews).
The British government has wasted more money on failed projects than some countries spend building their entire infrastructure.
After hearing about the cancellation of the Stonehenge Tunnel project, yet it still racking up £179 million in cost, I wanted to look at other projects and costs to see what the picture looks like this century.
Every number here comes from official reports, the National Audit Office, parliamentary committees, and ministers' own admissions.
Let me show you where your money has gone.
HS2 was sold to the country as a £37.5 billion high speed rail network connecting London, Birmingham, Manchester, and Leeds. The first phase was supposed to open this year. In 2026.
Here's where it actually is.
After six years of construction and £46 billion spent, tunnels have been bored, earth has been moved, viaducts have been built. But there is no railway. Not a single metre of track. The legs to Manchester and Leeds have been cancelled entirely. What's left is a line from London to Birmingham with no confirmed opening date, no confirmed final cost, and estimates so unstable that Parliament's own Public Accounts Committee has warned the cash cost of Phase 1 alone could reach £80 billion. Some industry forecasts put it above £100 billion.
The Transport Secretary stood in Parliament last year and called it "an appalling mess." She said billions had been wasted on scope changes, ineffective contracts, and bad management. Fraud allegations have since emerged in the supply chain.
Three times the original price. A fraction of what was promised. And still years from completion.
But HS2 is just one example.
The NHS National Programme for IT was supposed to create a unified electronic health record for every patient in England. Launched in 2002 with a budget of £6 billion. Abandoned in 2011 with the Public Accounts Committee putting the expected cost at £12.4 billion. It delivered a fraction of its promised benefits. Only 13 out of 169 hospital trusts received the systems they were meant to get. Then one of the contractors sued the government and won a settlement of nearly half a billion pounds. On top.
During Covid, the government threw billions out the door with almost no checks. The Covid Counter Fraud Commissioner's final report, published December 2025, found that fraud and error across pandemic support schemes cost taxpayers £10.9 billion. How much has been recovered? £1.8 billion. The Commissioner's words, not mine. The previous government "left the front door open to fraud." Bounce Back Loans were rolled out in under two weeks with no independent verification. PPE contracts were handed to companies with no track record. Defective gowns, masks, and visors weren't inspected for two years. By the time anyone checked, the money was gone.
Universal Credit was supposed to simplify the benefits system. The original programme was budgeted at around £2 billion. The National Audit Office has flagged massive overruns repeatedly as the project ballooned in scope and complexity. Total costs have run many times higher than planned. Nobody was fired.
The smart meter rollout was supposed to be finished by 2020. It wasn't. Costs have hit £13.5 billion. The programme has been dogged by meters losing functionality, missed deadlines, and a failure to deliver the energy savings that justified the whole thing in the first place.
One many of you will be familiar with. The Post Office spent £600 million on a computer system called Horizon. It was fundamentally flawed. Its defects led to more than 900 wrongful convictions. Sub-postmasters lost their homes. Their businesses. Their families. At least 13 people took their own lives. Compensation has now reached £1.4 billion and is expected to hit £2 billion. Fujitsu, the company that built the system, has not paid a single penny toward that bill. It is still collecting government contracts.
The Fire Control project. £469 million. Seven years. An attempt to modernise fire service control rooms. Scrapped. Nothing delivered. What a waste.
The electronic tagging programme. Five years late. Tens of millions spent. Abandoned. They ended up buying off the shelf tags that could have been bought for a fraction of the price years earlier.
The Garden Bridge. £53 million of public money. Not a single piece was built. You might ask what £53 million was spent on exactly.
The Rwanda deportation scheme. £715 million. Four people went voluntarily. Not a single forced deportation was carried out. Then the whole thing was scrapped.
Now here's the part that ties it all together.
In 2019, the Prime Minister's own Implementation Unit looked at the government's £432 billion portfolio of major projects. Only 8% had proper plans to evaluate whether they were working. 64% of that spending, £276 billion, had no evaluation at all. None. The government was spending hundreds of billions of your money with no way of knowing if any of it was delivering.
The National Audit Office has said there has been a "consistent pattern of underperformance" spanning 25 years. Twenty five years of reports saying the same thing. And nothing changes.
Add it up. HS2 overruns. NHS IT written off. £10.9 billion in Covid fraud. Universal Credit ballooning. Smart meters over budget. Post Office compensation approaching £2 billion. Fire Control. Rwanda. Garden Bridge. Tagging. And those are just the ones that made the news. The total runs into the tens of billions. More than the entire annual education budget. Approaching what the government now spends on debt interest in a single year.
And here's the scary part. This is only what we know about. The NAO has been clear the real picture is worse because most projects aren't properly evaluated in the first place. These are the failures too big to hide. Imagine the ones that aren't.
This is the same government that says there's no money for public services. That raises your taxes every year and delivers less every year. That can't build a railway. Can't roll out a computer system. Can't buy protective equipment without losing billions to fraud.
And every time it happens, the pattern is the same. The project fails. The minister moves on. The civil servant gets a knighthood. The contractor gets the next contract. And you pick up the bill.
The UK doesn't have a funding problem. It has a competence problem. And until that changes, no amount of tax rises, borrowing, or spending reviews will make the slightest difference.
Any dose of toxic industrial fatty gunk injected into your body is too high.
I “chatted” to Gemini about the Masters…
Here’s it is making basic arithmetic mistakes and then making up history - all with total conviction.
It’s frightening to think how many people rely on tools like this for basic research.
https://g.co/gemini/share/ea395fcf4b5e
The Covid Inquiry Vaccines report will be published on Thursday.
If the Public Hearings last year were anything to go by, the report will say that serious side effects from the Covid vaccines were very rare.
Our Witness Statements to the Inquiry – which they ignored in the Public Hearings – contradicted that. The evidence is that it’s more like 1 in 800 which is far from rare.
Watch these two clips about the ‘Myth of Rare’
https://youtu.be/dCBIJ9fgwPg
https://youtu.be/a0DzUbPsm20
There’s more ! After the Public Hearings, MHRA reported on its ‘Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor’ programme (which actively monitored 36,000 people): 13.7% of those vaccinated reported “medically serious” adverse events (defined by MedDRA as death, life-threatening, requiring hospitalisation, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect). About 1 in 7 !
Just a note of caution - active surveillance like YCVM captures more events than passive systems (like Yellow Card), and YCVM reports would also need to be assessed for causation. So maybe not as horrendous as 1 in 7 but Holy Moly: it’s a long way from 1 in 7 to Hugo Keith KC’s “rare, very rare, extremely rare, so rare.”
Finally, all the above are just the short-term reported harms. There’s also the inevitable likelihood of longer term damage due to the latency of the documented cardiac harms and immune compromise. The damage might not manifest seriously until months or years after vaccination at which point doctors would be unlikely to make the link to the Covid vaccines. But it can be seen in population-level data. Even Pfizer found it : https://x.com/PVI_2024/status/2041760621360795981
Full evidence here : https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/statements/
Video clips covering our evidence are here : https://www.youtube.com/@PVI_2024
@covidinquiryuk @mhragovuk @DHSCgovuk @PSCommissioner
@_aussie17 @1MikeFairclough @A1an_M @AaronKheriatyMD @Abridgen @ake2306 @alanvibe @ashTFE @bell00david @beverleyturner @carlheneghan @CarolinePover @CartlandDavid @ChildrensHD @ClareCraigPath @danastingregory @danny__kruger @danwootton @DebiEvansMatron @DocAhmadMalik @JuliaHB1 @Docs4PatientsUK @DrAseemMalhotra @DrBuckland @DrJBhattacharya @DrJohnB2 @Drs4CovidEthics @DrTeckKhong @EpochTimes @EstherMcVey1 @FreeWCH @GarySidley @GBNews @hicksyalex @Honest_Midwife @ianmcdermottLSO @JabinjuriesGL @JAHockett76
@james_freeman__ @jengleruk @JMCDelingpole @JohnBoweActor @Johnincarlisle @lakaruppropet1 @lawrie_dr @LD_Sceptics
Yesterday I posted about growing up in Lebanon with Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion on the shelves of Arabic book fairs; books I held before I ever held a Quran. That post went viral. And the most common response I am receiving is this:
"So it's okay to kill people based on the books they read?"
Let me be direct: no one said that. And you know no one said that.
I am one of the children I described. I was handed that literature before I was old enough to choose for myself, and no one in my community thought that was strange. So I am not talking about punishing anyone. I am talking about what we were given; and what it did to us.
We do not hesitate to analyze how Nazi propaganda shaped an entire generation of Germans. We do not flinch when scholars examine how Soviet literature produced authoritarian thinking across the Eastern Bloc. But the moment someone points to the same dynamic inside Arab and Islamic culture, the conversation immediately collapses into: "are you calling for violence?"
That is not a response. That is a way of avoiding one.
Ideas have consequences. Culture has consequences. What children are handed shapes what they become; that is not a controversial claim, it is the most basic principle of education. The question worth sitting with is not whether I am justifying harm. The question is why you are so determined to change the subject.
You cannot protect the next generation of Arab and Muslim children from ideological poison if every attempt to name that poison is treated as an act of aggression. The most honest thing I can do for my own people is tell the truth about what we were given to read; and refuse to pretend it did not matter.
“Emergency doc” Christian thinks being a chiropractor disqualifies someone from demanding that people ask crucial and relevant questions about published research.
And people wonder why doctors are increasingly regarded as arrogant and high-handed.
Don’t be like Christian.
Stories encouraged by the big AI players designed to have everyone clamoring for “tighter regulation” which - surprisingly - they’ll have a major hand in (“only they understand the dangers”).
Also surprisingly, smaller players will thereby get locked out.
Meet Zoe Katze, PhD., http://C.Ht, DAPA.
https://newsfeed.time.com/2011/02/01/believe-it-zoe-the-cat-phd/
http://www.dreichel.com/articles/dr_zoe.htm
The irony is that the genesis of many “real” diseases and disorders is, in fact, based on fraudulent science which then gets propagated throughout the literature and accepted as fact.
When is all of that going to be called out as well?
(Rhetorical question - never!)
What exactly "communism" was envisaged to be and whether the USSR actually had it might be debatable.
But we don't have democracy, liberal or otherwise.
Yeah, but did he mention that the testing was meaningless, the sequence a computer construct, and a lot of elderly/ frail people with “positive tests” were killed (via deadly institutional protocols), which was then blamed on a virus?
That’s highly amusing.
However, as worrying as this is, I actually find the fact that so many people are so surprised by it more frightening.
It demonstrates a fundamental (and dangerous) misunderstanding regarding how LLMs work and their capabilities.
Unfair to homeopathy which (if no biochemical / pharmacological action) takes advantage of the power of the mind to help the person heal themself.
“Gender affirming care”, as well as the egregious physical harms, weaponizes a person’s psychology against themselves.
None of this is remotely surprising. The sex change experiments conducted by Dr John Money decades ago resulted in his subjects committing suicide. It was entirely forseeable that vivisecting people's genitalia in order to turn them into hideous, sterile parodies of the opposite sex would destroy their minds and souls. Hacking off a boy's dick and feeding him estrogen does not turn him into a pretty girl; hacking off a girl's tits and feeding her testosterone does not turn her into a handsome boy; in both cases they wake up one day to realize that they have irreversibly become abominations, and worse, that they were partners in their own destruction, that they asked to be destroyed.
That's a hard thing to live with, and so, many decide not to.
All of this was easily predictable, and indeed was predicted. From the very beginning.
And yet an entire generation of white kids was subjected to this butchery for a decade. Celebration of this butchery of white youth was made mandatory. It was subsidized by the state. It was taught in the schools. The entire system was turned into a factory for mutilating white kids.
There's no going back for those kids.
There shouldn't be any going back for the people who enabled and encouraged it, either.
What I’ve not seen commented upon (yet) is that the GD data aside, it’s quite extraordinary that we have a medical-industrial complex applying a formal psychiatric diagnostic label to nearly 1 in 10 adolescents (control data) and apparently that’s not an issue?
The Finnish study is orders of magnitude more complete and rigorous than the entire literature cited in justification on behalf of the false claim that pediatric gender medicine is evidence based combined.
All the criticism of an enormous study tracking every single person receiving gender medicalization in a country, in some cases for decades, by people willing to cite a collection of the shoddiest pseudo-studies ever assembled on any subject, is tragifarcical cope by people whose bad faith has long ago been established beyond question.
Do try to learn something about research.
Plenty of studies have 2:1 group ratios one way or another meaning 1/3 had (or didn’t) have “the treatment”.
Power is a function of the group sizes and the effect size the trial is attempting to detect.
These were both large groups.
This kind of stupid is pretty difficult to cure.
Do you think it’s defensible that censorship extended to the official Inquiry?
@lensiseethrough @MaidmentRos @MakisMD @MartinKulldorff @MartinNeil9 @mattletiss7 @MidwesternDoc @Mmontclairre @MontgomeryToms @mottomeneki @NickHudsonCT @NickHunt5 @OffGuardian0 @OTURISK @P_McCulloughMD @Pandata19 @profnfenton @React19org @robinmonotti @scottish_vig @sonia_elijah @Telegraph @thecoastguy @TheConWom @TheFreds @TheRustler83 @ThinkingSlow1 @TJamesRoyle1 @Togetherdec @TonyHinton2016 @ukcolumn @ukcvfamily @ukmfa1 @UsforThemUK @VIBUK_Official @GeoFio8 @Beck_Sall @AllisonPearson @GBNEWS @LizfinchEvans @TalkTV @NG_Northgroup @jengleruk @Docs4PatientsUK @PerseusGroup
The Covid Inquiry Vaccines report is due 16 April.
Tomorrow we’ll start a series of posts exposing our evidence to the Inquiry which they ignored and buried because it was full of inconvenient facts.
But first, here’s what one of the Vaccine-Injured groups had to say about CENSORSHIP at the Inquiry’s Public Hearings into the Covid vaccines:
- when giving evidence, they were shut down if they started to mention inconvenient facts
- they were only allowed to cross-examine Witnesses if the Inquiry pre-approved their questions; many were disallowed. They were not allowed to cross-examine the AstraZeneca witness at all
- so-called expert witnesses were allowed to get away with misleading, questionable or downright false claims.
- contrary evidence was ignored
WATCH https://vimeo.com/1054744885?fl=pl&fe=cm&f…
Other short videos here : https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/press-conference/
and here https://www.youtube.com/@pvi_2024
The collective conclusion is that the Module 4 Public Hearings were framed to perpetuate the myth that the Covid vaccines were a resounding success.
Here are our full Witness Statements to the Inquiry which it ignored and buried : https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/statements/
@covidinquiryuk @mhragovuk @DHSCgovuk
@_aussie17 @1MikeFairclough @A1an_M @AaronKheriatyMD @Abridgen @ake2306 @alanvibe @ashTFE @bell00david @beverleyturner @carlheneghan @CarolinePover @CartlandDavid @ChildrensHD @ClareCraigPath @danastingregory @danny__kruger @danwootton @DebiEvansMatron @DocAhmadMalik @JuliaHB1 @Docs4PatientsUK @DrAseemMalhotra @DrBuckland @DrJBhattacharya @DrJohnB2 @Drs4CovidEthics @DrTeckKhong @EpochTimes @EstherMcVey1 @FreeWCH @GarySidley @GBNews @hicksyalex @Honest_Midwife @ianmcdermottLSO @JabinjuriesGL @JAHockett76 @james_freeman__ @jengleruk @JMCDelingpole @JohnBoweActor @Johnincarlisle @lakaruppropet1 @lawrie_dr @LD_Sceptics
"The PA Is Moderate" - A Claim That Doesn't Survive Contact With Their Own Content
Every Friday - "Juma Mubaraka" (Blessed Friday) - Palestinian Authority official media, mosques, and social channels flood with a consistent message: Jaffa is ours. Haifa is ours. Beer Sheva is ours. We will return.
This isn't Hamas. This is the PA. The entity the international community keeps calling "moderate" and wants to run a future Palestinian state.
Here's what people who make that claim need to reckon with:
1. Official PA television repeatedly broadcasts songs declaring "Jaffa, Acre, Haifa and Nazareth are ours" - naming cities deep inside sovereign Israel, not in the West Bank.
2. Senior Fatah officials say it plainly. Fatah Central Committee member Tawfiq Tirawi stated on Lebanese TV: "Don't you dare think there is even a single Palestinian who would agree that Haifa, Jaffa and Acre are not Palestinian. No. Haifa, Jaffa, Acre and Nazareth are Palestinian, despite the Americans and the Israelis."
3. PA children's programming tells kids that all of Israel is "the '48 lands" and that "all of this land belongs to us... and will return to us." This isn't fringe content. This is the official PA children's show.
4. PA textbooks (2025-2026) still show maps where Israel simply does not exist. The entire area from the river to the sea is labeled "Palestine." Tel Aviv doesn't appear. Israel is referred to as "the Zionist entity." A 10th-grade Islamic education textbook asks students: "Under what circumstances is jihad to liberate Palestine considered a personal duty for every Muslim?"
5. Even crossword puzzles in PA newspapers list Tel Aviv, Jaffa, Tiberias, and Haifa as "Palestinian cities."
6. PA sports coaches tell young athletes that "today we are Jerusalem, Haifa, Jaffa and Acre... today we are the Palestinian entirety."
This is not about the West Bank. This is not about settlements. This is about Tel Aviv, Haifa, Beer Sheva - cities within Israel's pre-1967 borders.
The PA signed a letter of intent with the EU in 2024 promising curriculum reform. The EU sent over 400 million euros based on that promise. An independent review found that as of late 2025, zero reforms had been implemented.
So the next time someone tells you the PA is a moderate peace partner that just wants a state alongside Israel - ask them a simple question: If that's true, why does every piece of their own media, education, and political messaging tell their people they're coming back to Jaffa?
The difference between Hamas and the PA isn't the goal. It's the timetable.
“How different it looks under a microscope”
😂😂😂
Of COURSE it’s ok. @TheGreenParty is racist. Its only possible complaint is that its candidate says out loud the bit that should be kept quiet for now.
There’s no way @ZackPolanski could stop the man standing – even assuming he wanted to. Zack is a LINO - there to be walked on.
I’ve just learned that @leicspolice have investigated @ABridgen for sharing the Amelia video below. I’d like to inform the Leicestershire constabulary that I made the video, the @ukhomeoffice created the character, and that they’re great bloody Orwellian wankers who can sod right off.
cc @makeukgood @AmeliaOnSolana @AmeliajakSolana @BasilTheGreat @benonwine @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain_ @elonmusk @godblesstoto @SmashJT @RoyalFamily
Enough with the PR stunts, @MSF. Your "blockade" claims are a deliberate deception. Numerous approved medical organizations have successfully delivered massive amounts of aid this year, but you have flatly refused to meet the mandatory registration requirements, protocols designed to block terrorist infiltration.
If humanitarian aid were actually your priority, you would have made the effort to register like everyone else. You have no one to blame but yourselves. We aren’t surprised. MSF continues to prove it is a political organization, not a humanitarian one. Stop the politics and stick to the facts
Neither of these men had any reason to believe Jews in North London had been involved in a nefarious conspiracy to set fire to their own ambulances yet they were perfectly happy to share that belief publicly without shame, even imagining themselves victims rather than persecutors
Yep. It’s all fraudulent.
There are dozens of papers purporting to show how harmful “the covid virus” is which don’t even report the vaccine status.
The enabler of this thinking is the “spike protein” nonsense which acts to falsely join two narratives.
To me the paradox of modern medicine lies in that the individual body knows more than any system. The normalisation of urban sedentary hyper-consumption life is not actually normal. Our bodies know about sleep, hydration/nutrition and activity but we pretend new normal is good-
On this story...see my article here:
https://tinyurl.com/3mv8pwh4
Since writing, I have been looking into the "back-to-sleep" narrative.
I have found that the reduction in SIDS is nearly all due to reclassification to unknown or other causes such as "asphyxia".
More to follow...
Noelia's story left me reeling in horror this week.
And that was before I found out that the person with clinical oversight of her actual euthanasia wears several hats, one of which is that she also works as a transplant coordinator.