This is getting pathetic. Now that it’s been pointed out that he himself agitated for Covid authoritarianism, Ivor Cummins—who insists the entire debacle was purely top-down—claims that, ackshyually, he wasn’t really supporting lockdowns or masks… he was just playing 4D chess.
The American people should have immediate free access to the science that we so generously fund through the @NIH. Starting today, we do.
If @elonmusk can't fix it that should tell us all something: "they" are going to do what they're going to do.
All we can do is prepare.
Today, FDA provided important updates on the risk of myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, noting the risk is higher in young men.
Dass ich mal Herrn Homburg retweete…
Aber das Video, das er hier postet, ist tatsächlich gut und sehr erhellend! Er erklärt ganz offen, was ihn wirklich so unglaublich antreibt: einfach geilster Fame 🔥
Demnächst zieht er vermutlich nach Dubai und influenzt von dort weiter…
Mercury in vaccines creates distrust in vaccines, but the American Academy of Pediatrics is attacking CDC's ACIP after we no longer recommend mercury containing vaccines. Astonishing that pro-mercury in kids is their battle cry!! @AmerAcadPeds
Stephen Ireland, who targeted me with endless abuse on here because I oppose the chemical castration of children and the removal of protected spaces for women and girls, has just been sentenced to 30 years in jail for child rape.
Looks like someone is getting tired of dealing with her and she still won't STFU. Her picture should be in the @Wikipedia entry for Dunning-Kruger. 🤣
"JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of at- tack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever."
"Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to pin down."
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em- bracing an imperial Judiciary."
"JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyz- ing the governing statute involves boring “legalese,”"
"JUSTICE JACKSON would do well to heed her own admoni- tion: “[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by law.” Ibid. That goes for judges too."
I can't wait for the memes. 🤣
"Number of words spoken by each Supreme Court Justice in the 2024 term, as of November 15."
h/t @cremieuxrecueil
CRUELTY IS CHEAPER
>@Waitrose
Less regulation, skirting regulations .
Killing to sell to non believers by Halal is breaking the existing law.
Code is 6057
Zu meiner Arbeitsweise und Position im Kriegsfall am Beispiel des neuen Konfliktes im Nahen Osten:
Im Krieg wird m. E. noch mehr gelogen als während der Jagd oder bei der Liebe. Deswegen gibt es von mir keine vorschnellen Urteile wie „erfolgreicher und notwendiger Schlag gegen das Atomprogramm des Mullah-Regimes“.
Niemand weiß das bisher wirklich. Kein Trump, kein Mossad und sehr wahrscheinlich noch nicht einmal die Iraner selbst kennen wenige Tage später das ganze Ausmaß der Schäden.
Ich bin als Journalist natürlich skeptisch, wenn der Befehlsgeber wenige Minuten danach von „Erfolg“ spricht. Nicht überrascht, skeptisch. Ich kann mir keinen Journalismus ohne Skepsis ausdenken.
Und wenn „Erfolg“ dann als Tatsache in Text oder Überschrift verkauft wird, auch ohne abzuwarten welche geopolitischen Verwerfungen daraus evtl. entstehen und wenn diese Gefahr nicht einmal erwähnt wird, dann hat das mit Journalismus nichts mehr zu tun.
Nicht falsch verstehen: ich darf auch als Journalist durchaus der Meinung sein, dass das alles gerechtfertigt ist und nötig. Ich darf aber nicht den Teil der Geschichte weglassen, der meinen Jubel darüber etwas eintrüben könnte. Denn so führe ich meine Leser in die Irre.
It's hard to focus on Israel's airstrikes in Lebanon due to Israel's invasion of Syria, which is hard to focus on due to Israel's atrocities in the West Bank, which are hard to focus on due to Israel's genocide in Gaza, which is hard to focus on due to Israel's war on Iran.
Four senior executives at Palantir, Meta, and OpenAI have been formally appointed lieutenant colonels in the US Army. By @wyattreed13 for @TheGrayzoneNews
🚨BREAKING: A spike in foetal loss after Covid-19 vaccination in early pregnancy
Women who received an mRNA vaccine between 8 and 13 weeks gestation experienced a significantly higher rate of foetal loss—around 13 losses per 100 pregnancies—compared to an expected rate of just 9.
@MdBreathe @Jikkyleaks @newstart_2024
11/
Here is a link to the pre-print:
https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2025.06.18.25329352v1
This was of course a team effort with my amazing co-authors: @RetsefL, @TalPatalon, Sivan Gazit, @TracyBethHoeg, @JosephFraiman and Yaakov Segal.
Our new pre-print on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy is out!
Women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) had a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses:
Dose 1 = 3.9 more per 100 women
Dose 3 = 1.9 more per 100 women
Based on data on >200K pregnancies in Israel
🧵
BREAKING:
Analysis of over 220K pregnancies in Israel during 2016- 2022 found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13 was associated with a higher-than-expected number of eventual fetal losses (miscarriages, abortions & stillbirths)!
Pregnant women vaccinated with dose 1 during weeks 8-13 had nearly 3.9 (95% CI: [2.55-5.14]) additional fetal losses above expected per 100 pregnancies. Most of the excess fetal losses occurred after gestational week 20 and nearly half occurred after gestational week 25.
In contrast, pregnant women vaccinated for influenza during weeks 8-27 exhibited a consistently lower-than-expected observed number of fetal losses, likely the result of healthy vaccinee bias. Women vaccinated for COVID-19 or influenza prior to pregnancy exhibited according-to-expected or lower-than-expected numbers of fetal losses.
The study used innovative observed-to-expected methodology, where data from prior years were leveraged to determine the expected number of fetal losses based on the individual characteristics of the pregnant women who vaccinated and their week of vaccination.
Israel spends 19 months deliberately targeting and destroying every hospital in Gaza with precision weapons, justifying it by claiming Hamas guys were nearby.
Now, Iran lobs missiles at an IDF base deliberately built near a hospital, and Israel demands unique victim status:👇
Vom Standpunkt eines herrschaftsfreien Diskurses wäre verpflichtende Anonymität besser als eine Klarnamenpflicht.
Die Nutzer würden einfach an der Qualität ihrer Beiträge gemessen und negative Folgen wie Polarisierung fielen weg. Und getrollt und gelogen wird auch mit Klarnamen.
Absolutely this is the most important role for the pubic in science. Prevent the emergence of @NIH funded “Science Monopolies” comprising central control by a field of science by its leadership.
Watch this brief @consiliumsci video which explains the history of science monopoly in critical care.
https://youtu.be/BTgEU07FI9o
Hier sehen Sie eine Liste der internationalen Planspiele, mit denen Pharmaindustrie und Militärs die „Pandemie” über einen Zeitraum von 20 Jahren einstudierten. Ihre „Schweinegrippe” floppte, aber Corona wurde zum weltweiten Schlager, dem sich nur wenige Länder wie Schweden entzogen.
Es war keine Verschwörung, sondern ist alles im Netz zu finden. Man setzt schlicht darauf, dass die Leitmedien nicht darüber berichten. Mit Erfolg! 2/2
Netanyahu Calls Iran Strikes Necessary To Prevent War He Just Started
Habe mit Herrn Prof. Krüger ein Kapitel für dieses Buch geschrieben: "Das Virus, die Seuchenbekämpfung und die Angst".
Heute waren u.a. Herr @ArminLaschet, Frau @schroeder_k, Herr Voshaar und Krüger bei der Vorstellung des Buches in Berlin heute mit dabei.
Wie immer bei Corona; auf den Punkt gebracht.
I confess to being concerned that they would rotate this panel with more @SenBillCassidy cronies but I know @RetsefL @MartinKulldorff @RWMaloneMD have all spoken up when data was uncomfortable.
The last crew would rubber stamp cyanide if it was called an adjuvant.
These may not be your personal favorite picks but you cannot deny it’s a step in the right direction.
Call balls and strikes…
One strike still on the board is mRNA vaccines being given to the unhealthy.
1) After @SecKennedy removes physicians for financial conflicts of interest from CDC vaccine panel, NY Times Apoorva Mandavilli quotes American Academy of Paediatrics (APA) critic.
Irony moment! 🤡
Guess who funds APA: Moderna, Merck, GSK, Sanofi, Genentech.... (see next post)
Non-PFE estimates at ~1.3M, conservative (50% of 52WMA non-PFE excess) baseline adjusted PFE estimate at 1.9M.
EUROMOMO is paltered, and the 1.4M estimate is non-PFE and paints a lower bound as well.
Nuclear warheads are actually the only reason the American president and administration are still taken serious...
"If the vaccines were effective, the data failed a basic test of credibility, and we can’t learn about their effectiveness from this data. If they weren’t effective, then data showing effectiveness is false."
https://shahar-26393.medium.com/the-australian-government-analyzed-covid-vaccines-discard-the-results-4d7f7e61cd40
Jeder, der sich im deutschen Medienbetrieb tummelt, kennt die unausgesprochenen Regeln, die man befolgen sollte, um mitspielen zu dürfen:
Es gibt Medien wie die Süddeutsche, FAZ, Spiegel, Die ZEIT, ARD und ZDF, mit denen kannst du ohne Bedenken reden, die sind unverfänglich.
Dann gibt es Redaktionen, bei denen es gerade noch so okay ist, wenn du dort einen Gastbeitrag publizierst oder ein Interview gibst: DIE WELT, der CICERO, oder – schon deutlich heikler: die BILD-Zeitung.
Und dann gibt es Medien, die als so gefährlich gelten, dass dich ein Kontakt mit ihnen in ernsthafte Schwierigkeiten bringen kann: NIUS, Tichys Einblick, Junge Freiheit.
Wer dort etwas publiziert, ist aus Sicht vieler Journalisten „falsch abgebogen“ und wird als abtrünnig angesehen, nicht selten sanktioniert.
Ich halte diese Entwicklung für bedenklich. Viele Medienvertreter beklagen eine zunehmende Spaltung der Gesellschaft. Doch was sagt es über sie selbst aus, wenn Sie ihre eigene Branche pauschal in „gut“ und „böse“, in „ethisch“ und „unethisch“ aufteilen?
Und was sagt es über uns alle aus, wenn wir jemanden als "Persona non grata" abstempeln, nur, weil er in einer Zeitung, die uns nicht gefällt, publiziert? Egal wie differenziert und sachlich sein Beitrag ist? Was bitte ist das für ein Verständnis von Toleranz, von Offenheit, von Rede- und Meinungsfreiheit?
The physician patient relationship is sacred and when the government tries to become your doctor, we don’t have a great track record. Our job at the FDA is to review data and decide whether products are safe and effective. The FDA is not your doctor.
Congratulations to all the winners.
No one needed to anything.
Old account.
Note the date:
Die Lehrerin Elisabeth liebte die Arbeit mit Kindern, doch sie verzweifelte an den Intrigen ihrer Kollegen. Schon mit 63 ging sie in Rente und hat heute 4.000 Euro netto. https://trib.al/n2gKCbs
In a recent interview with @NPRinskeep at @NPR's @MorningEdition, Harvard University president Alan Garber urges Americans to learn more about @Harvard. Here is a good place to start.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/harvard-tramples-the-truth
The Z-scores are one measure of deviation from trend, giving a sense of "is this deviation within reasonably expected random variation, or is this maybe something else?"
We see 10+ years of history from 2009 - 2020 with Z-scores largely centered around zero, but nudging 2 in 2017 - 2018* (a 1 in 20 or so event).
And then the Unholy Mess we made with a Z-score peaking at ~10.5...importantly...sustained and elevated post jabs.
*several lines of evidence point to "COVID-19" being "COVID-17" or even earlier.
Principles of Public Health #6
Das Problem mit #LLM (ich bin an und für sich großer Fan)- sie sind halt im Prinzip der Durchschnitt der Menschen und wenn die Menschen im Schnitt falsch liegen, wird das eben reproduziert. Entgegen der Möglichkeit es besser wissen zu können!
Wisdom of the crowd, my ass…
Oggi #31maggio a Torino si presenta “Critica della ragione pandemica”, cui ho avuto l’onore di contribuire.
La fotografia di una gestione che ha abolito raziocinio e giustizia, snaturato la scienza, segnato i rapporti umani e introdotto un metodo di controllo delle popolazioni.
It should be plainly clear - special interests have ZERO substantive arguments against the historic MAHA report - which explicitly calls out corporate capture of government. They are only quibbling with footnotes which is the least surprising move imaginable.
These special interests are betraying the Trump admin’s efforts to reverse childhood disease.
Last week, President Trump sat with his cabinet and said that a generational achievement of this administration will be to reverse the childhood chronic disease crisis.
The event emphasized turning over every stone - ultra-processed food, screen time, vaccine injury, sedentary behavior, environmental toxins. President Trump also said the admin needs to be bold and “do what they need to do” to solve the chronic disease crisis.
The MAHA Report is a roadmap of potential chronic disease factors the government will address. As has been said repeatedly, there is a genuine desire from everyone in the admin to engage on pro-growth, pro-innovation solutions with stakeholder. The populist frustration voters feel towards the trends of sick kids is out of the bottle and not going back. This government has the fearlessness to knowledge the problem and wants to engage on solutions.
Although many of these groups started impugning the report before reading it, the clear message from the document is that the American farmer - and whole American food - should be the centerpiece of our health. It also laid a stake in the ground that America will lead on fearless gold star science - particularly on taboo subjects.
Instead of shadowy lobbying activities that are being laughed at, I genuinely invite all stakeholders to engage on solutions to what we all agree is a problem.
And to the media - instead of stenographing opposition research sent to you by lobbyists, maybe investigate what these lobbyists are trying to discredit or hide.